Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Historical Roots of Strategic Agility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Agility in Dynamic Business Environments

Part of the book series: International Series in Advanced Management Studies ((ISAMS))

  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter takes a historical perspective on the theoretical underpinnings of strategic agility. It provides an overview of seminal contributions by influential scholars who helped pave the way for the strategic agility paradigm. The analysis delineates key preconditions, enablers, and enhancing factors related to agility. It also highlights the integral relationship between agility and uncertainty that recurs across seminal works. The discourse begins by tracing early warnings against rigid planning mentalities and the gradual shift from forecasting to flexibility and scenario thinking. It then explores the transition from closed to open innovation models as environmental velocity accelerated. The review also reveals an evolution from resource exploitation to dynamic capability building as sources of competitive advantage became less durable. Additionally, it elucidates the progression from avoidance of uncertainty to management approaches such as options thinking. The analysis examines the theoretical underpinnings of core strategic agility attributes, including organizational ambidexterity, entrepreneurial orientation, rapid decision-making, and absorptive capacity. It also reveals both alignment and tensions between these concepts and traditional strategic management theories. Finally, the chapter underscores how the imperative for strategic agility, as emphasized by contemporary discourse, was foreshadowed by insights from early scholarship. The enduring quest for strategic agility in navigating external ambiguities and adapting internal activities remains critical in determining competitive positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I., Declerck, R. P., & Hayes, R. L. (1976). From strategic planning to strategic management. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American industrial enterprise. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1998). Waking up to the new era of hypercompetition. Washington Quarterly, 21(1), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Diego, E., & Almodóvar, P. (2022). Mapping research trends on strategic agility over the past 25 years: Insights from a bibliometric approach. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 31(2), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Sarasathy, S., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Affordable loss: Behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2007). The new deal at the top. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1964). Managing for results. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973). Organization design. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. The Business History Review, 76(1), 37–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G. (2019). In the ecosystem economy, what’s your strategy? Harvard Business Review, 97(5), 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Yip, G. S., & Hensmans, M. (2012). Achieving successful strategic transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiah, G., & Gossain, S. (1998). Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem. Strategy & Leadership, 26(5), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., & Farmer, D. (2017). Strategic agility—Integrating business intelligence with strategy. In Real-time strategy and business intelligence (pp. 11–36). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjödin, D., & Heikkilä, V. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 118, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment. Managing differentiation and integration. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 4(4), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M., Bragg, W., & Hegarty, E. (1996). Collaborating across lines of business for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, T. A. (1998). Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Business Review, 76, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C., & Freek, V. (2023). Have companies become too specialized? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2023/02/have-companies-become-too-specialized. Accessed 24 Jan 2024

  • McGrath, R. G. (1997). A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 974–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidun, U., Reeves, M., & Schüssler, M. (2019). Do you need a business ecosystem? Available at https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/do-you-need-business-ecosystem. Accessed 13 Sept 2022.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prange, C., & Hennig, A. (2019). From strategic planning to strategic agility patterns. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1977). Strategic goals: Process and Politics. Sloan Management Review, 19(1), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1978). Strategic change: "logical incrementalism". Sloan Management Review, 20(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1979). Technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategy. Sloan Management Review, 20(3), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. S., & Weinhold, W. A. (1979). Diversification through acquisition: Strategies for creating economic value. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shams, R., Vrontis, D., Belyaeva, Z., Ferraris, A., & Czinkota, M. R. (2021). Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1969). The science of the artificial. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, G., Jr., & Hout, T. M. (1990). Competing against time. Research-Technology Management, 33(2), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organisational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E., & von Krogh, G. (2005). Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: Sense-testing business models. European Management Journal, 23(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1987). Substitutes for strategy. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 211–233). Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy

    Marco Balzano

  2. University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

    Guido Bortoluzzi

Authors
  1. Marco Balzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guido Bortoluzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balzano, M., Bortoluzzi, G. (2024). The Historical Roots of Strategic Agility. In: Strategic Agility in Dynamic Business Environments. International Series in Advanced Management Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58657-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation