Abstract
The transformative trajectory of edX, from its inception to the current day, has been marked by evolving narratives that mirror wider socio-technological paradigms. This chapter delves into the intricate interplay of branding, linguistic inclusivity, and the technological determinism that underpins edX and how it succumbed to the forces of neoliberalism, turning the leading not-for-profit provider into a commercial entity. Through an analysis of its changing web presence, course offerings, and demographics, the chapter elucidates how the rhetoric of empowerment might inadvertently perpetuate certain neoliberal ideologies. Drawing on scholars such as Knox, Berlin, and others, the chapter critically examines the nuances of ‘openness’ and ‘freedom’ that are inherent in edX’s value proposition. It emphasises the gap between the promise of unrestricted access and the reality of systemic barriers, underscoring the importance of critically evaluating the potential and limitations of online educational platforms. More importantly, the chapter assists researchers in uncovering ideologies that seem progressive on their surface but have deep invested interests in capital accumulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G. (2014). MOOCs as neocolonialism: Who controls knowledge?. International Higher Education, (75), 5–7.
Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Creative Common.
Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Clarendon Press. http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~mjacovid/Two%20Concepts.pdf
Bexley, E., Marginson, S., & Wheelahan, L. (2007). Social capital in theory and practice: The contribution of Victorian tertiary education in the new economy’ disciplines of business studies and IT. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Bimber, B. (1990). Karl Marx and the three faces of technological determinism. Social Studies of Science, 20(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631290020002006
Browne, L., & Rayner, S. (2013). Managing leadership in university reform data-led decision-making, the cost of learning and déjà vu? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494890
Campus Technology. (2019, June 13). EdX launching 9 new master’s degree programs. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2019/06/13/edx-launching-9-new-masters-degree-programs.aspx
Chau, P. (2010). Online higher education commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y
Class Central. (2023, May 2). Udemy settles Class Action. Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/udemy-settles-class-action/
EdSurge. (2020, January 8). With ‘MicroBachelors’ program, EdX tries again to sell MOOCs for undergraduate credit. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-01-08-with-microbachelors-program-edx-tries-again-to-sell-moocs-for-undergraduate-credit
edX. (2014). Homepage. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.edX.org
edX. (2015). Homepage. http://www.edX.org
edX. (2022). edX impact report. Retrieved July 4, 2023, from https://impact.edx.org/2022
edX. (2023). Homepage. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from http://www.edX.org
edX Press. (2021, June 29). 2U, Inc. and edX to join together in industry-redefining combination. https://press.edx.org/2u-inc.-and-edx-to-join-together-in-industry-redefining-combination
Enlyft. (2023, August 23). Products edX, companies using edX. https://enlyft.com/tech/products/edx
Feenberg, A., & Friesen, N. (2012). (Re)Inventing the internet: Critical case studies. Springer Science & Business Media.
Foss, S. K. (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press.
Friesen, N. (2008, June). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of e-learning. Ubiquity, 2008, 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1386858.1386860
Gidley, J. M., Hampson, G. P., Wheeler, L., & Bereded-Samuel, E. (2010). From access to success: An integrated approach to quality higher education informed by social inclusion theory and practice. Higher Education Policy, 23(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.24
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hashmi, A. H., & Shih, C. W. (2013, May 30). The edX student. The Harvard Crimson. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/5/30/the-edX-student-international/
Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism, human capital, and the skills agenda in higher education—The Irish case. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10(1), 93–111. http://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/PDFs/10-1-07.pdf
Inside Higher Ed. (2021, August 25). Online learning giants 2U and edX will merge. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/08/25/online-learning-giants-2u-and-edx-will-merge
Kendzior, S. (2012, August 20). The closing of American academia. Aljazeera Opinion, p. 11. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2012/8/20/the-closing-of-american-academia
Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the Open Educational Resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
Lapowsky, I. (2013). MOOCs try to break the language barrier. Inc. http://www.inc.com/issie-lapowsky/
Lewin, T. (2013, May 2). Professors at San Jose state criticize online courses. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/education/san-jose-state-philosophy-dept-criticizes-online-courses.html?_r=1
Mirrlees, T., & Alvi, S. (2014). Taylorizing academia, deskilling professors and automating higher education: The recent role of MOOCs. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 12(2), 45–73.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
Saltman, K. (2009). The rise of venture philanthropy and the ongoing neoliberal assault on public education: The Eli and Edythe broad foundation. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor (16). https://doi.org/10.14288/workplace.v0i16.182244
Selwyn, N. (2014). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media, and Technology, 40(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press.
Rey Agudo, R. (2019, January 8). The language of MOOCs. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/views/2019/01/09/moocs-overwhelming-dependence-english-limits-their-impact-opinion
Rosen, R. J. (2012). The single biggest change in education since the printing press. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/05/the-single-biggest-change-in-education-since-the-printing-press/256655/
Shah, D. (2023, May 4). Exploring edX’s “final” tax returns: Revenue surges, losses mount, and contributions decline. Class Central Report. https://www.classcentral.com/report/edx-final-tax-returns/
Stacey, P. (2014). Pedagogy of MOOCs. INNOQUAL—International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3). http://www.papers.efquel.org/index.php/innoqual/article/view/161
The Chronicle. (2013). An Open Letter to Professor Michael Sandel From the Philosophy Department at San Jose State U. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Document-an-Open-Letter/138937/
The Economist. (2014, June 28). The digital degree. The Economist. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21605899-staid-higher-education-business-about-experience-welcome-earthquake-digital
Williams, K. (2014). Content analysis of Coursera, edX, and Udacity course platforms. University of Prince Edward Island.
Winn, J. (2012). Open education: From the freedom of things to the freedom of people. http://joss.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dianati, S. (2024). The Paradox of Progress: Dissecting the Neoliberal Ideologies in edX’s Transformation. In: The Commercialisation of Massive Open Online Courses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-58183-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-58184-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)