Abstract
Critiquing the underlying ideologies embedded within artefacts often presents a formidable challenge, especially when those ideologies appear to be aligned with positive and progressive values. In this chapter, our primary objective is to conduct a comprehensive critique of Udacity by applying a theoretical framework (Gramscian common sense), a methodological approach (ideological criticism), and specific analytical tools (<ideographs>). This critical alignment sheds light on the ideologies underpinning Udacity and serves as a valuable template for students seeking to evaluate similar subjects within their own contexts. This examination unfolds in two distinct parts, with the first part focusing on Udacity’s homepage and the second part delving into the ‘About Us’ page on their website. By scrutinising the content and visual elements presented to visitors, it aims to uncover the implicit messages about education and society that Udacity conveys. By meticulously dissecting each word and phrase on Udacity’s homepage, several highlighted key elements were analysed for further interrogation. The findings reveal a narrative that suggests Udacity is promoting a self-responsible, self-interested, and self-directed model of learning, where the ultimate goal of education appears to be employability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G. (2014). MOOCs as neocolonialism: Who controls knowledge? International Higher Education, 75, 5–7.
Ayers, D. F. (2005). Neoliberal ideology in community college mission statements: A critical discourse analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0033
Beckton, J. (2012). Public technology: Challenging the commodification of knowledge. In M. Neary, L. Bell, & H Stevenson (Eds.), Towards teaching in public: Reshaping the modern university (pp. 118–132). A&C Black.
Boden, R., & Nedeva, M. (2010). Employing discourse: Universities and graduate ‘employability.’ Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903349489
Bottici, C. (2010). Imagining human rights: Utopia or ideology? Law and Critique, 21(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-010-9068-8
Canaan, J. E., & Shumar, W. (2008). Structure and agency in the neoliberal university. Routledge.
Chafkin, M. (2013). Udacity’s Sebastian Thrun, godfather of free online education, changes course. Fast Company, p. 14.
Chau, P. (2010). Online higher education commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y
Chroucher, C. (2023). Three decades of change in Australia’s university workforce. Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education. http://go.cdu.edu.au/fgva
Crow, G. B., & Muthuswamy, B. (2014). International outsourcing in the information technology industry: Trends and implications. Communications of the IIMA, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6687.1002
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685130
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, A., & Friesen, N. (2012). (Re) inventing the Internet: Critical Case Studies. Springer Science & Business Media.
Forbes. (2022, May 22). The state of tech staffing: Success tomorrow relies on smart outsourcing today (Web blog post). https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2022/05/06/the-state-of-tech-staffing-success-tomorrow-relies-on-smart-outsourcing-today/?sh=4ad1a0ae3fd5
Foss, S. K. (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press.
Friesen, N. (2008, June). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of e-learning. Ubiquity, 2008, 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1386858.1386860
Gaebel, M. (2013). MOOCs—Massive Open Online Courses. EUA Occasional Papers.
Garnham, N. (2000). ‘Information society’ as theory or ideology: A critical perspective in technology, education, and employment in the information age. Information, Communication & Society, 3(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180050123677
Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–464. http://her.hepg.org/content/0515nr62324n71p1/
Giroux, H. A. (2003). Spectacles of race and pedagogies of denial: Anti-black racist pedagogy under the reign of neoliberalism. Communication Education, 52(3–4), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452032000156190
Giroux, H. A. (2010). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. The Educational Forum, 74(3), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2010.483897
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Ed. & Trans.). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hall, R. (2013). Academic activism in the face of enclosure in the digital university. Power and Education, 5(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2013.5.2.186
Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2023). The affective life of neoliberal employability discourse. In P. Siivonen, U. Isopahkala-Bouret, M. Tomlinson, M. Korhonen, & N. Haltia (Eds.), Rethinking graduate employability in context: Discourse, policy, and practice (pp. 95–112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20653-5_5
Hill, D. (2008). Contesting neoliberal education: Public resistance and collective advance. Routledge.
Hill, D. (2010). Class, capital and education in this neoliberal and neoconservative period. In S. Macrine, P. McLaren, & D. Hill (Eds.), Revolutionising pedagogy: Education for social justice within and beyond global neo-liberalism (pp. 119–144). Palgrave Macmillan.
Heron, T. (2008). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the exercise of human agency. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 20(1–4), 85–101.
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Welsh, B. H. (2003). Career education and labour market conditions: The skills gap myth. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 5–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23767172
Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the Open Educational Resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
Lacković, N. (2020). Neoliberal higher education: Digital, innovative, relational, pictorial? In Inquiry graphics in higher education: New approaches to knowledge, learning and methods with images (pp. 25–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39387-8_2
Lane, J., & Kinser, K. (2012). MOOCs and the McDonaldization of global higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 1.
Lenette, C., Baker, S., Hirsch, A., & McBrien, J. L. (2019). Educational policies and practices of English-speaking refugee resettlement countries. In Systemic policy barriers to meaningful participation of students from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds in Australian higher education: Neoliberal settlement and language policies and (deliberate?) challenges for meaningful participation (Chapter 4, pp. 88–109). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401891_004
Levidow, L. (2002). Marketising higher education: Neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies. In K. Robins & F. Webster (Eds.), The virtual university? Knowledge, markets and management (pp. 227–248). Oxford University Press. http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199245574
Mirrlees, T., & Alvi, S. (2014). Taylorizing academia, deskilling professors and automating higher education: The recent role of MOOCs. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 12(2), 45–73.
Mishra, D. (2023, June 30). Exclusive: Upgrad in talks to buy majority stake in US edtech firm Udacity. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/startups/upgrad-in-talks-to-buy-majority-stake-in-us-edtech-firm-udacity/articleshow/101374007.cms
Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0025
Newfield, C. (2023). Aftermath of the MOOC wars: Can commercial vendors support creative higher education? International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 9(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/44645783
Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Science and Culture, 7(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439809526510
Noble, D. F. (2004). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Aakar Books.
Pandodaily. (2014, May 12). Sebastian Thrun: Udacity is “Not a MOOC”. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2014-05-12-sebastian-thrun-udacity-is-not-a-mooc
Selwyn, N. (2015). Minding our language: Why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learning, Media, and Technology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.101252
Udacity. (2014). Udacity homepage. https://www.udacity.com/
Udacity. (2015). Udacity Homepage. Retrieved from https://www.udacity.com/
Udacity. (2023). Udacity homepage. https://www.udacity.com/
US Labor Statistics. (2023). Employment in STEM occupations, 2022 and projected 2032. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm
Waters, J. (2013, November 12). What will happen to MOOCs now that Udacity is leaving higher ed? Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/12/11/what-will-happen-to-moocs-now-that-udacity-is-leaving-higher-ed.aspx
Williams, K. (2014). Content analysis of Coursera, edX, and Udacity course platforms. University of Prince Edward Island.
Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: Mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.607516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dianati, S. (2024). Behind the Screens: Unpacking the Ideologies of Udacity Through Ideographs and Criticism. In: The Commercialisation of Massive Open Online Courses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-58183-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-58184-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)