Abstract
Tailor welded blank (TWB) has been developed in the automotive industry to improve structural safety and material efficiency. Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel is the main material for laser tailor welding due to its resistance to oxidation and decarburization during hot stamping, which can otherwise deteriorate the performance of welded joints. This study investigates the use of partial ablation welding (PAW) and filler wire welding (FWW) as compared to traditional self-fusion welded (SFW) to enhance the mechanical performances of Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel welded joints. The effects of welding processes on the microstructure of welded joints as well as the mechanism of performance enhancement were investigated. Tensile testing results showed that PAW and FWW joints consistently fractured at the base material, whereas the SFW joints fractured at the weld seam. The maximum tensile loads of PAW and FWW joints were, respectively, 12.75 and 12.93% higher than that of SFW joints. Additionally, the microhardness distribution of PAW and FWW joints is uniform with no softening zone. Finally, the study discusses the improved mechanical properties of PAW and FWW joints in terms of microstructural evolution and diffusion of Al elements.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
Ultra-high strength steel (UHSS) is increasingly used in automotive manufacturing for reducing vehicle weight and improving safety and crashworthiness [1,2,3]. Press hardened steel (PHS), as a type of UHSS, is typically used for automotive crash-resistant structural parts such as A-pillars, B-pillars, and roof rails [4, 5]. The most widely used steel grade in PHS is 22MnB5, which has a martensitic microstructure after hot stamping and a tensile strength of approximately 1500 MPa [1]. Tailor welded blanks (TWBs) are used to produce parts with the required geometry, shape, and mechanical properties while reducing weight and improving crash behavior due to the absence of reinforcing blanks and fewer joining elements necessary [6, 7]. For the TWBs of PHSs, the most common method of joining sheets with varying thicknesses or different materials is laser welding to create a laser welded blank (LWB), which is then subjected to hot stamping [8].
To avoid surface oxidation as well as decarburization of sheet metal during hot stamping, the surface is typically pre-coated with an additional protective layer [1, 9]. Windmann et al. [10] discovered that the Al-Si layer has high-temperature oxidation resistance and excellent corrosion resistance. At present, Al-Si coating is commonly used as a protective coating for PHSs. However, many study results showed that the Al-Si layer deteriorates the final mechanical performances of the joints. Sun et al. [11] revealed that Al-10 wt.% Si coating led to approximately 15% ferrite and 85% martensite generated in the weld seam of the coated joints, whereas martensite is predominantly formed in the weld seam of the uncoated joints. Saha et al. [12] examined the microstructures of FZ at different conditions of pre- and post-press hardening. Results showed that the pre-press-hardened FZ microstructures mainly consisted of δ-ferrite, martensite, and a minimal quantity of lower bainite. On the other hand, the post-press-hardened FZ microstructures were primarily composed of martensite and α-ferrite. Chen et al. [13] investigated the microstructure characteristic of laser-welded Al-Si-coated boron steel joints. They discovered that the Al-Si coating fused during the welding process, forming a Fe-Al phase, which was determined to be a solid solution of α-Fe and Al. This study discovered that the Al-Si layer had a substantial effect on the microstructures and mechanical performances of the welded joints. Vierstraete et al. [14] indicated that laser ablation before welding is a useful approach for forming Al-Si-coated tailor-welded blanks. The approach has been patented by ArcelorMittal. Lin et al. [8] found that the use of filled wire during the welding process can dilute the content of aluminum in the weld, thereby reducing the amount of δ-ferrite phase.
Therefore, partial ablation welding (PAW) and filler wire welding (FWW), in comparison with the traditional self-fusion welded (SFW), were used to enhance the mechanical performances of Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel welded joints in this work. The mechanical properties of the PAW, FWW, and SFW joints were compared. Meanwhile, the Al content of the various phases formed in the weld was investigated. Based on these analyses, the influences of welding processes on the microstructure evolution of welded joints as well as the mechanism of performance enhancement were investigated.
2 Experimental Procedure
2.1 Materials
Laser-welded Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel sheets with a full martensite microstructure were used in this work. The chemical composition (wt.%) of the base material (BM) is shown in Table 1. The ultimate tensile strength of BM was 1446 MPa, and the elongation was about 6.7%. Figure 1 shows the microstructure and the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) line scanning result across the Al-Si layer. The overall thickness of the Al-Si layer was approximately 45 µm and consisted of FeAl, Fe2Al5, and α-Fe layers. As shown in Fig. 1b, two platforms were distinguished by the element variation and were determined as FeAl and Fe2Al5 phases. The crossing position represented the elemental change between α-Fe and BM.
2.2 Laser Welding Processes
Compared with traditional self-fusion welding (SFW), partial ablation welding (PAW) and filler wire welding (FWW) were used to enhance the mechanical performances of welded joints of Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel. The process parameters of the three laser welding processes are listed in Table 2. The laser power and welding speed applied in the PAW process were 3 kW and 6.5 m/min, respectively. 20 µm of Al-Si layer on one side was removed by laser ablation before laser welding. The experimental laser power and welding speed for the FWW and SFW processes were 4 kW and 2.8 m/min, respectively, and the defocus distance was 3 mm above the upper surface of the specimen.
2.3 Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization
Uniaxial tensile tests were conducted at a tensile speed of 3 mm/min using a universal testing machine (MTS E45.105-ATBC). The full-field strain distribution on the specimen's surface was recorded using digital image correlation (DIC) technology. Three specimens were tested for each laser welding process to ensure the repeatability of the experiment. Figure 2 depicts the geometry of a tensile test sample in accordance with the ASTM: E8/E8M standard. Vickers microhardness was determined using a force of 200 g and a dwell duration of 10 s.
Metallography specimens were cut by wire cutting in the direction perpendicular to the weld. The microstructure of the welded joint was observed by optical microscope (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the specimens were inlaid, ground, polished, and etched. The content of aluminum was determined by EDS.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Tensile Properties
Figure 3 presents the engineering stress–strain curves of the BM and PAW, FWW, and SFW joints. The corresponding mechanical properties are shown in Table 3. The PAW and FWW joints fractured at the base metal, while the SFW joints fractured at the fusion zone. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the PAW and FWW joints was 1427 MPa and 1431 MPa respectively, slightly lower than the BM (1442 MPa). The total elongation of the PAW and FWW joints was also slightly lower than that of the BM. However, the UTS and elongation of SFW joints reduced to 1276 MPa and 1.4%. The UTS of PAW and FWW joints was 12.75% and 12.93% higher than that of SFW joints, respectively, and the elongation was 77.8% and 76.7% higher. Therefore, compared with the SFW process, PAW and FWW processes can significantly increase the tensile strength and elongation of welded joints.
The local ductility of a material is determined by its resistance to crack initiation and propagation, which is responsible for bending, stretch flanging, and crash resistance. In order to determine local ductility, fracture surfaces need to be evaluated [15, 16]. Figure 4 shows the fracture locations and fracture macro-morphology of PAW, FWW, and SFW joints. The three welded joints did not show any significant necking near their failure locations. As shown in Fig. 5, the width and thickness of the fracture surface were obtained by an optical microscope equipped with a digital microscope system, and the fracture surface was perpendicular to the microscope's observation direction. ASTM E8 was used to measure the fracture surfaces’ width and thickness. According to the corresponding equations, the reduction of area at fracture and local fracture strain of PAW, FWW, and SFW joints was about 0.50%, 0.61%, and 0.08%, respectively. SFW joints fractured at the FZ, and the reduction of area at fracture was significantly lower than that of PAW and FWW joints. All three joints showed less than 5% reduction in area at fracture, indicating brittle fractures.
3.2 Microhardness
The microhardness test indentation points were spaced at 0.2 mm, and 10 points were tested on the left and right sides of the weld seam. Figure 6 presents the microhardness profile of PAW, FWW, and SFW joints. The microhardness distribution of PAW and FWW joints was uniform without a softening zone, and the average microhardness values were 491 and 503 HV, respectively. However, in the FZ of the SFW joint, the microhardness declined significantly due to the presence of ferrite structures. The average microhardness of the FZ of the SFW joint decreased to 308 HV, which was about 68% of the BM, corresponding to the phenomenon of the joint fracturing at the fusion zone.
3.3 Microstructure
Figure 7 presents the morphology of PAW, FWW, and SFW joint cross-sections, respectively. The welds were all hourglass-shaped without obvious defects, such as cracks and porosity. The FZ of PAW and FWW joints was uniform and had a less white phase. In contrast, a light-colored phase was produced in the SFW joint because the entire Al-Si layer was incorporated into the FZ from both sides of the weld. Figure 8 shows the microstructures of the upper and lower regions of the PAW, FWW, and SFW joints. As shown in Fig. 8a–d, the lath martensite microstructures were clearly demonstrated in the FZ of the PAW and FWW joints. In contrast, α-ferrite was generated in the upper and lower areas of the SFW joint, while martensite and a substantial amount of α-ferrite phase existed in the FZ, as shown in Fig. 8e, f. EDS spot scanning was conducted on five spots in each phase to determine the cause of α-ferrite formation and to calculate the average. As presented in Table 4, the content of Al element in α-ferrite (1.73–1.82 wt.%) was considerably higher compared to that in martensite (0.42–0.54 wt.%).
Saha et al. [17] revealed that ferrite was responsible for the decrease in tensile properties in welded joints. Al contents above 1.2 wt.% have been reported to prevent the transformation of ferrite to austenite, resulting in the stabilization and maintenance of the ferrite phase throughout the welding process [17, 18]. Dippenaar et al. [19] discovered that the presence of Al components reduces free energy change, accelerates ferrite phase transition kinetics, and suppresses austenite phase transition kinetics. The high Al element content is the primary reason for δ-ferrite formation, which recrystallizes to form α-ferrite after the hot stamping process [20]. Wang et al. [21] identified that the existence of δ-ferrite reduces the initial energy and propagation energy of cracks, which leads to easy ductile cracking in δ-ferrite and initiates brittle cracking in the tempered martensitic matrix.
For the SFW joints, the Al-Si layer melts and spreads into the weld seam during the laser welding process, causing the Al content in the weld to increase. The strong stabilizing effect of Al elements on ferrite prevents the transformation of the primary δ-ferrite phase [11, 22], thus producing α-ferrite phases in the SFW joints after hot stamping. The presence of α-ferrite is where failure cracks can easily propagate, reducing the strength and hardness of the SFW joints.
For the PAW joints, the martensite has a low Al content of less than 0.20 wt.%, as shown in Table 4. The PAW process removed the 20 µm Al-Si layer on one side by laser ablation, and the remaining α-Fe (Al, Si) layer was melted into the PAW joints throughout the welding process. However, no ferrite was found in the PAW joints due to the whole martensite structure, which explains the high strength and hardness of the weld, as observed in the mechanical properties.
Furthermore, the Al content in the FWW joints was approximately 0.50 wt.%, as shown in Table 4. Lin et al. [8] revealed that the use of carbon steel filler wire during laser welding can reduce the probability of δ-ferrite generation. As a result, the initial cracks were difficult to interconnect to form long cracks. Thus, the addition of carbon steel filler wire improved the strength and elongation of the FWW joints.
4 Conclusions
In this study, the effect of different welding processes on the mechanical properties, microstructural evolution, and Al content of laser-welded Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel was studied. The welded joints were produced using three different welding processes, namely, PAW, FWW, and SFW, and their mechanical properties were evaluated. The main conclusions of this study were summarized as follows:
-
1.
The results presented that the SFW joint had significantly lower strength and elongation compared to the PAW and FWW joints. Moreover, a brittle fracture occurred at the weld seam of the SFW joint. The ultimate tensile strength of the SFW joint decreased from 1442 to 1245 MPa, and the elongation decreased from 6.7 to 1.4%. In contrast, the ultimate tensile strength of PAW and FWW joints showed an improvement of approximately 12%. The fracture locations of the PAW and FWW joints were consistently at the BM.
-
2.
The formation of α-ferrite in the weld caused softening of the SFW joints. The average microhardness of the SFW joints decreased to 308 HV, which was about 68% of the BM. No softening occurred in the FZ of the PAW and FWW joints, and the microhardness distribution was uniform. The average microhardness of PAW and FWW joints was 491 and 503 HV, respectively.
-
3.
The PAW process removes one side of the Al-Si layer by laser ablation, which can effectively control the content of the Al element. The FWW process dilutes the Al content and inhibits the formation of α-ferrite in the weld seam through the use of carbon-steel filler wire. Al-Si coating provided the Al element during the SFW process, leading to a large amount of α-ferrite produced in the weld. In comparison, the predominant martensite was formed in the PAW and FWW joints.
References
Karbasian H, Tekkaya AE (2010) A review on hot stamping. J Mater Process Technol 210(15):2103–2118
Kim HY, Park JK, Lee M-G (2013) Phase transformation-based finite element modeling to predict strength and deformation of press-hardened tubular automotive part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):1787–1801
Golem L, Cho L, Speer JG et al (2019) Influence of austenitizing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si coated press hardened steel. Mater Des 172
Wang J, Enloe C, Singh J et al (2016) Effect of prior austenite grain size on impact toughness of press hardened steel. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 9(2):488–493
Merklein M, Wieland M, Lechner M et al (2016) Hot stamping of boron steel sheets with tailored properties: a review. J Mater Process Technol 228:11–24
Khan MS, Razmpoosh MH, Biro E et al (2020) A review on the laser welding of coated 22MnB5 press-hardened steel and its impact on the production of tailor-welded blanks. Sci Technol Weld Join 25(6):447–467
Merklein M, Johannes M, Lechner M et al (2014) A review on tailored blanks—production, applications and evaluation. J Mater Process Technol 214(2):151–164
Lin W, Li F, Hua X et al (2018) Effect of filler wire on laser welded blanks of Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steel. J Mater Process Technol 259:195–205
Chen R, Zhang C, Lou M et al (2020) Effect of Al-Si coating on weldability of press-hardened steels. J Mater Eng Perform 29(1):626–636
Windmann M, Röttger A, Theisen W (2013) Phase formation at the interface between a boron alloyed steel substrate and an Al-rich coating. Surf Coat Technol 226:130–139
Sun Y, Wu L, Tan C et al (2019) Influence of Al-Si coating on microstructure and mechanical properties of fiber laser welded 22MnB5 steel. Opt Laser Technol 116:117–127
Saha DC, Biro E, Gerlich AP et al (2016) Fusion zone microstructure evolution of fiber laser welded press-hardened steels. Scripta Mater 121:18–22
Chen X, Lei Z, Chen Y et al (2019) Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welded Al-Si coated hot-press-forming steel joints. Materials (Basel) 12(20)
Taylor T, Clough A (2018) Critical review of automotive hot-stamped sheet steel from an industrial perspective. Mater Sci Technol 34(7):809–861
Larour P, Freudenthaler J, Weissböck T (2017) Reduction of cross section area at fracture in tensile test: measurement and applications for flat sheet steels. J Phys 896(1):012073
Wagner L, Larour P (2018) Influence of specimen geometry on measures of local fracture strain obtained from uniaxial tensile tests of AHSS sheets. Mater Sci Eng 418(1):012074
Saha D, Biro E, Gerlich A et al (2016) Fiber laser welding of Al-Si coated press hardened steel. Weld J 95(95):147–156
Di HS, Sun Q, Nie XK et al (2017) Mirostructure and properties of laser welded joints of dual phase and press-hardened steels. Procedia Eng 207:1665–1670
Dippenaar RJ, Phelan DJ (2003) Delta-ferrite recovery structures in low-carbon steels. Metall and Mater Trans B 34:495–501
Xu W, Yang S, Tao W et al (2022) Effect of Al-Si coating removal state on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welded 22MnB5 steel. J Mater Eng Perform
Wang P, Lu S, Xiao N et al (2010) Effect of delta ferrite on impact properties of low carbon 13Cr–4Ni martensitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527(13–14):3210–3216
Wang X, Zhang Z, Hu Z et al (2020) Effect of Ni foil thickness on the microstructure of fusion zone during PHS laser welding. Opt Laser Technol 125:106014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Rightsholder, under exclusive licence to [Springer Nature Switzerland AG], part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
He, Q., Hou, Z., Kong, J., Deng, L., Ma, X., Min, J. (2024). Effect of Welding Processes on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Laser-Welded Al-Si-Coated 22MnB5 Steel. In: Kusiak, J., Rauch, Ł., Regulski, K. (eds) Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes. NUMIFORM 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58006-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58006-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-58005-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-58006-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)