Skip to main content

Home, Trust, and the Right to the City: Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The US Housing Crisis

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

The final chapter weaves together the various threads that pervade this book: trust, home, housing insecurity, and activism. Home as a space of trust does not lose its significance in the face of the housing crisis; rather, its potential and significance are underlined. The analysis reveals not only the pitfalls of the current housing system and the hardships of people on the ground, but also the strong sense of belonging people continue to feel and home’s potential for current activism around the housing question. This chapter thus aims to strike a hopeful chord, showing that while the home has become unsettled, it remains a central building block of urban society. Things are thus more complicated than to simply attest a loss of home and trust in times of the US housing crisis. Rather, the final chapter highlights the ambivalence of home and trust. When analyzing people’s housing biographies, home is simultaneously about trust and distrust, about belonging and displacement, about rootedness and venturing into the future. Having extrapolated the significance of home, this chapter then concludes in a call for a universal right to housing as part and parcel of the right to the city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I will use the term right to housing in this context; however, similar political demands can also be found under slightly different headings such as “the right to stay put” (Newman and Wyly 2006), “the right to community” (Hubbard and Lees 2018), and “the right not to be displaced” (Morel et al. 2012; Stavropoulou and Lee 1996).

References

  • Blunt A, Sheringham O (2018) Home-city geographies: Urban dwelling and mobility. Prog Hum Geogr 43(5):815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunt A et al (2021) The living of time: Entangled temporalities of home and the city. Trans Inst Br Geogr 46:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N et al (ed) (2012) Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond M (2016) Evicted. Poverty and profit in the American City. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman (2021) Edelman Trust Barometer 2021. https://www.edelman.de/research/edelman-trust-barometer-2021. Accessed 22 Mar 2021

  • Gago V (2017) Neoliberalism from below: Popular pragmatics and baroque economies. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons A (2017) A place to call home. In: Verso Editors (ed) The right to the city: a Verso report. Verso, London, pp 42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2003) The right to the city. Int J Urban Reg Res 27:939–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2012) Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm A (2014) Das Recht auf Stadt in umkämpften Räumen. Zur gesellschaftlichen Reichweite lokaler Proteste. In: Gestring N et al (eds) Stadt und soziale Bewegungen. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 43–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard P, Lees L (2018) The right to community? City 22(1):8–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (2014) Die Revolution der Städte. CEP Verlagsanstalt, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (2016 [1968]) Das Recht auf Stadt. Edition Nautilius, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden D, Marcuse P (2016) In defense of housing. Verso, London and New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse P (2012) Whose right(s) to what city? In: Benner N et al (ed) Cities for people, not for profit. Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge, London, pp 24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe BJ (2016) No place like home: Wealth, community, and the politics of homeownership. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield A (2014) The new urban question. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield A (2017) Fifty years on: The right to the city. In: Verso Editors (ed) The right to the city: a Verso report. Verso, London, pp 15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D (2003) The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel M et al (2012) The history and status of the right not to be displaced. Forced Migr Rev 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz S (2018) Urban precarity and home: There is no right to the city. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 108(2):370–379

    Google Scholar 

  • National Opinion Research Center (NORC) (2021) General Social Survey (GSS). https://gss.norc.org/. Accessed 22 Mar 2021

  • Newman K, Wyly EK (2006) The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Stud 43:23–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell M (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolnik R (2014) Place, inhabitance and citizenship: The right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. Int J Hous Policy 14(3):293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolnik R (2019) Urban warfare: Housing under the empire of finance. Verso, London and New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen E (2020) The voucher promise. “Section 8” and the fate of an American neighborhood. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross LM, Squires GD (2011) The personal costs of subprime lending and the foreclosure crisis: A matter of trust, insecurity, and institutional deception. Soc Sci Q 92(1):140–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid C (2012) Henri Lefebvre, the right to the city, and the new metropolitan mainstream. In: Benner N et al (ed) Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge, London, pp 42–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulou M, Lee LT (1996) The question of a right not to be displaced. Proc Ann Meet (Am Soc Int Law) 90:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein S (2019) Capital city: Gentrification and the real estate state. Verso, London and New York City

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Keller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keller, J. (2024). Home, Trust, and the Right to the City: Concluding Remarks. In: The US Housing Crisis. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57758-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics