Skip to main content

An Archaeology of Perception in the Metaverse: Seeing a World Within a World Through the Artist’s Eye

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Augmented and Virtual Reality in the Metaverse

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Cultural Computing ((SSCC))

  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes a 3D Virtual Reality (VR) metaverse in the shape of a world within a world, to be used for an experiential archaeological approach, to facilitate understanding the sensoriality of past individuals. Virtual reconstructions of the archaeological remains have so far failed to recreate a realistic experiential environment. For this purpose, we selected as study site a house of artists from the past (1930) from the town of Balchik, around which we built the proposed metaverse, with the objects of study being the house and artistic work of the painter Cecilia Cuţescu-Stork. The metaverse is designed to provide rich sensory experiences in order to allow a better understanding of the artworks and the context in which they were made. The VR metaverse is comprised two connected 3D virtual spaces that users can traverse, including with VR headsets, each space contributing to a cognitive augmentation through the sensory qualities of the constructed virtual space. The metaverse reconstruction will allow access to both specialists and the public, as the metaverse is implemented on a free VR platform (Mozilla Hubs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Used as an instrument in science, metaphor is a first tool “when trying to unravel a complicated theme” (Calvin 2004), resulting from “direct physical experience” (Lakoff and Johnson 1980, p. 57).

References

  • Aristotle (1984) De Anima. In: The complete works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball M (2022) The metaverse and how it will revolutionize everything. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22(4):577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW, Simmons WK, Barbey AK, Wilson CD (2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn Sci 7(2):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J, Ondrus J (2023) Myths and realities of the metaverse. California Management Review, Insights, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletsis C (2017) The new era of virtual reality locomotion: a systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology. Multimodal Technol Interact 1(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1040024

  • Borsotti M (2022) Digital practices for generating interaction: exhibits and museums as phygital environments. In: Griffin H (ed) (In)tangible heritage(s): design, culture and technology—past, present, and future, AMPS proceedings series 29.2. ISSN 2398-9467, University of Kent, pp 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw T, Kruppa M (2020) Epic and unity rev their engines for the next era of entertainment. Financial Times. Archived from the original on August 12, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucuţa O (1931) Balcic. Ramuri, Craiova

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis D, Karatay N (2022) Mixed Reality (MR) for generation Z in cultural heritage tourism towards metaverse. In: Stienmetz JL, Ferrer-Rosell B, Massimo D (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2022. ENTER 2022. Springer, Cham, pp 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94751-4_2

  • Calvin WH (2004) A brief history of the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaluppi E, Ceccon L (2022, November) Defining a metaverse for the cultural heritage. In: CHNT Editorial board, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on cultural heritage and new technologies, Vienna, Austria, pp 10–12. Doctoral Consortium of the International Conference on Computer Supported Education CSEDU (DCCSED)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers DJ (2022) Reality +. Virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. Penguin Books, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirio G, Marchal M, Regia-Corte T, Lécuyer A (2011) Walking in a cube: novel metaphors for safely navigating large virtual environments in restricted real workspaces. Virtual Real 15(2):109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuţescu-Storck C (1943) Fresca unei vieţi. I.E. Toruţiu, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • DAO https://dao.decentraland.org/en/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Decentraland https://decentraland.org/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Dowling M (2021) Fertile LAND: pricing non-fungible tokens. Finance Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813522

  • Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Baabdullah AM, Ribeiro-Navarrete S, Giannakis M, Al-Debei MM, Wamba SF (2022) Metaverse beyond the hype: multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage 66:102542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eve S (2014) Dead men’s eyes: embodied GIS, mixed reality and landscape archaeology. British Archaeology Reports, British Series 600, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethereum https://ethereum.org/en/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • European Commission (2001) e-Europe report. Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte M, Kurillo G (2010) Cyber-archaeology and metaverse collaborative systems. Metaverse Creativity (new title: Virtual Creativity) 1(1):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte M, Lercari N, Galeazzi F, Borra D (2010) Metaverse communities and archaeology: the case of Teramo. Proc EuroMed 79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortnite https://www.fortnite.com/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Gaafar AA (2021) Metaverse in architectural heritage documentation and education. Adv Ecol Environ Res 6(10):66–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent E (2022) Lessons from a second life> before meta, philip rosedale created an online universe. IEEE Spectrum 59(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheorghiu D, Ştefan L (2019) Virtual art in teaching and learning archaeology: an intermedia to augment the content of virtual spaces and the quality of immersion. In: Gheorghiu D, Barth T (eds) Artistic practices and archaeological research. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 166–183, ISBN: 9781789691412

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheorghiu D, Ştefan L, Hodea M (2021) Gestures and re-enactments in a hybrid museum of archaeology: animating ancient life. In: Geroimenko V (ed) Augmented reality in tourism, museums and heritage, a new technology to inform and entertain. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, pp 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70198-7

  • Holotescu C, Holotescu V, Holotescu T (2018) Understanding blockchain technology and how to get involved. Technical report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25185.33126/1

  • https://about.fb.com/news/2023/09/impact-of-vr-and-ar/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/top-7-technologies-that-power-the-metaverse. Accessed Aug 2023

  • https://amps-research.com/proceedings. Accessed Sept 2023

  • https://amps-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Amps-Proceedings-Series_29.2.pdf

  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401222000767

  • https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvndv7pg. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Joy A, Sherry JF (2003) Speaking of Art as Embodied imagination: a multisensory approach to understanding aesthetic experience. J Consum Res 30:259–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn SM (1980) Image and mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritikos J, Zoitaki C, Tzannetos G, Mehmeti A, Douloudi M, Nikolaou G, Alevizopoulos G, Koutsouris D (2020) Comparison between full body motion recognition camera interaction and hand controllers interaction used in virtual reality exposure therapy for acrophobia. Sensors 20(5):1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstmatrix https://artspaces.kunstmatrix.com/en. Accessed Aug 2023

  • LaJevic L (2021) My experience with remote instruction: choices in learning and artmaking. Art Educ 74(2):10–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1852383

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Fang S, Dong H, Xu C (2021) Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J Manuf Syst 58:346–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livatino S, Zocco A, Iqbal Y, Gainley P, Morana G, Farinella G (2022) Virtual reality user-scene interaction: head-rotation versus joystick movements. In: EE international conference on metrology for extended reality, artificial intelligence and neural engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroXRAINE

  • Longo MC, Faraci R (2023) Next-generation museum: a metaverse journey into the culture. Sinergie Ital J Manage 41(1):147–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesh https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/mesh. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Meta Live Studio https://metalivestudio.com/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Meta https://www.meta.com/horizon-worlds/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Microsoft Mesh website, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/mesh. Accessed Aug 2023

  • Minecraft https://www.minecraft.net/en-us. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Monod E, Klein HK (2005) From eHertitage to interpretive archaeology systems (IAS): a research framework for evaluating cultural heritage communication in the digital age. ECIS 2005 Proceedings. 86. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2005/86

  • Moţăianu M (2021) The poetry of the cityscapes virtual exhibition, website https://www.artsteps.com/view/6036969fd85aa70494db85a3. Accessed Aug 2023

  • Mozilla Hub website, https://hubs.mozilla.com/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Murgoci O (1913) Ţara Nouă. Dobrogea sudică şi Deliormanul. Institutul de Arte Grafice şi Editură, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci F, Felicetti A, Hermon S (2022) Populating the digital space for cultural heritage with heritage digital twins. Data 7(8), https://doi.org/10.3390/data7080105

  • Omniverse https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/omniverse/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Papagiannidis S, Bourlakis M (2010) Staging the new retail drama: at a metaverse near you! J Virtual Worlds Res 2(5):425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SM, Kim YG (2022) A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access 10:4209–4251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Păuleanu D (2007) Balcicul în pictura românească. ARC, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt D (2020) Mental representations. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-representation/. Accessed 27 Nov 2023

  • Pylyshyn Z (2003) Seeing and visualizing: it’s not what you think. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana À, Salvadó R, Pérez PD (2022) An archeology of the metaverse: virtual worlds and optical devices. Baltic Screen Media Rev 10(2):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschnabel PA (2021) Augmented reality is eating the real-world! The substitution of physical products by holograms. Int J Inform Manage 57, Article 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102279

  • Riecke BE, McNamara TP (2007) Spatial awareness and navigation in real and virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(4):971

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblox https://www.roblox.com. Accessed September 2023

  • Rosi T, Perini M, Onorato P, Oss P (2021) Commercial virtual reality headsets for developing augmented reality setups to track three-dimensional motion in real time. Phys Educ 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-65525a2

  • Ruddle RA, Lessels S (2009) For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement but not a rich visual scene. Psychol Sci 20(7):872–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryufath S (2021) Metaverse: a potential threat to humanity and ethics. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25540.14726

  • Scarre C, Lawson G (eds) (2006) Archaeoacoustics. MacDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell J (2008) The art of game design. A book of lenses. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Second Life https://secondlife.com. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Sequeira M, Morgado M (2013) Virtual archaeology in second life and OpenSimulator 6(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L, Spaulding S (2021) Embodied cognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/ Accessed 27 Nov 2023

  • Silva da P (2022) The archaeological simulation: blending times and time travel through Metaverse? In: Griffin H (ed) (In)tangible heritage(s): design, culture and technology—past, present, and future, AMPS Proceedings series 29.2. ISSN 2398-9467, University of Kent, pp 428–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeates R (2010) An archaeology of the senses. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Prehistoric Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • Sketchfab (2023) https://sketchfab.com/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Smith T (2019) Art to come. Histories of contemporary art. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SA, Mulligan N (2021) Immersion, presence, and episodic memory in virtual reality environments. Memory 29(8):983–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackpole T (2022) Exploring the metaverse. Harv Bus Rev 100(4):146–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson N (2011) Snow crash. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhaimi A, Lim AWH, Chia XW, Li C, Makino H (2022) Representation learning in the artificial and biological neural networks underlying sensorium for integration. Sci Adv 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ștefan L, Moțăianu M (2022) Virtual learning environment for visual arts education—a post-pandemic resilient education solution. In: The 17th international scientific conference eLearning and software for education eLSE 2022, May 12–13, Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  • Ștefan L, Moțăianu M, Gheorghiu D (2022a) Experiment my shape. E-learning in 3D virtual environments for design and architecture. In: The 17th international conference on virtual learning, 2022 ICVL, November 25–26, Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  • Ștefan L, Moțăianu M, Moțăianu C (2022b) Rethinking visual arts education with new technologies and resources during the covid pandemic. In: The 15th annual international conference of education, research and innovation ICERI 2022, November 7–9, Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Taehyun K, Planey J, Lindgren R (2023) Theory-driven design in metaverse virtual reality learning environments: two exemplary cases. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3307211

  • Tafrali O (1928) Dionysopolis. Analele Dobrogei IX(2):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry Q, Keeney S (2022) The metaverse handbook. Innovating for the internet’s next tectonic shift. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevenin L (1932) Cecile Coutesco-Storck, sa vie et son œuvre. Quatre Chemins, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Unity https://unity.com. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Unreal https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US. Accessed Sept 2023

  • van Rijmenam M (2022) Step into the metaverse. How the immersive internet will unlock a trillion-dollar social economy. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • VRChat https://hello.vrchat.com/. Accessed Sept 2023

  • Zhang X, Yang D, Yow CH, Huang L, Wu X, Huang X, Cai Y (2022) Metaverse for cultural heritages. Electronics 11(22):3730

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Vladimir Geroimenko for the kind invitation to contribute to this book. Thanks also to Mihaela Moţăianu for photography and digital processing of images and to the art students and writers who participated in the various testing of the Metaverse. Last, but not least, many thanks to M. Bogdan Căpruciu for the useful comments and to Mrs. Cornelia Cătuna for the editing of the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragoş Gheorghiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gheorghiu, D., Ştefan, L., Hodea, M., Moţăianu, C. (2024). An Archaeology of Perception in the Metaverse: Seeing a World Within a World Through the Artist’s Eye. In: Geroimenko, V. (eds) Augmented and Virtual Reality in the Metaverse. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57746-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57746-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57745-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57746-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics