Abstract
The study of polarization has gained increasing attraction in the past decades. Since observing both opinions and interactions is challenging, epistemic programs such as agent-based models have been proposed as a means to assessing the systemic consequences of social psychology mechanisms. Most results in agent-based models for opinion dynamics have focused on individual opinion constructs and pairwise interactions, with a few works treating group effects as constraints. Meanwhile, a tradition in social sciences has been putting emphasis on how group configuration affects individual behavior. In this work, we introduce a new model for accounting for both pairwise interactions in which actors observe and update opinions, and individual perception of the evolving configuration of groups that make up the population in which they are embedded. Through experiments, we show that pairwise interactions which are different depending on whether they are in-group or out-group, has quantifiable impact on the resulting polarization of a population. In particular, the tolerance toward out-group opinions is shown to have a strong impact on the resulting polarization. Our model produces and accounts for polarized states resulting from group consolidation and fragmentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Axelrod, R., Daymude, J.J., Forrest, S.: Preventing extreme polarization of political attitudes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(50), e2102139118 (2021)
Bail, C.A., Argyle, L.P., Brown, T.W., Bumpus, J.P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M.F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., Volfovsky, A.: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(37), 9216–9221 (2018)
Berger, R.L.: A necessary and sufficient condition for reaching a consensus using degroot’s method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76(374), 415–418 (1981)
Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D.J., Fisher, S., Berger, W., Sack, G., Flocken, C.: Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. J. Math. Sociol. 40(2), 80–111 (2016)
Brown, R.: Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 30(6), 745–778 (2000)
Converse, P.E.: The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideol. Discontent (1964)
DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)
Duclos, J.Y., Esteban, J., Ray, D.: Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. In: The Social Economics of Poverty, pp. 54–102. Routledge (2006)
Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S.J.: Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 563–588 (2008)
Fishbein, M., Raven, B.H.: The ab scales: an operational definition of belief and attitude. Human Relat. 15(1), 35–44 (1962)
Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Lorenz, J.: Models of social influence: towards the next frontiers. J. Artif. Societ. Soc. Simul. 20(4) (2017)
Iyengar, S., Westwood, S.J.: Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59(3), 690–707 (2015)
Lamont, M., Molnár, V.: The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 167–195 (2002)
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Merton, R.K.: Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger M., A.T., H., C. (eds.) Freedom and Control in Modern Society, vol. 18, pp. 18–66. New York, Van Nostrand (1954)
Lord, C.G., Ross, L., Lepper, M.R.: Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37(11), 2098 (1979)
Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18(12), 1819–1838 (2007)
Mason, L.: Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press (2018)
Mastroeni, L., Vellucci, P., Naldi, M.: Agent-based models for opinion formation: a bibliographic survey. IEEE Access 7, 58836–58848 (2019)
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Astels, S.: hdbscan: hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2(11), 205 (2017)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)
Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: Congress: A Political-economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press on Demand (2000)
Taber, C.S., Lodge, M.: Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(3), 755–769 (2006)
Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology, pp. 276–293. Psychology Press (2004)
Yang, V.C., van der Does, T., Olsson, H.: Falling through the cracks: modeling the formation of social category boundaries. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0247562 (2021)
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by the “European Polarisation Observatory” (EPO) of the CIVICA Research (co-)funded by EU’s Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement No 101017201. P.R. acknowledges support by the Data Intelligence Institute of Paris (diiP) through the French National Agency for Research (ANR) grant ANR-18-IDEX-0001 “IdEx Université de Paris” and SoMe4Dem (Grant No. 101094752) Horizon Europe project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cassells, D., Tabourier, L., Ramaciotti, P. (2024). Modeling Both Pairwise Interactions and Group Effects in Polarization on Interaction Networks. In: Botta, F., Macedo, M., Barbosa, H., Menezes, R. (eds) Complex Networks XV. CompleNet-Live 2024. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57515-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57515-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57514-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57515-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)