Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shared Understanding in Collaborative Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Governance Primer

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

The complex nature of public problems portends various perspectives on the rudiments, with the shared understanding needed as a conduit to creating the synergy for collective action. Cross-sector stakeholders’ shared knowledge based on negotiating the various interests, interpretations, positionalities, and versions of workable solutions allows for constructive pathways regarding collaborative process-related engagements and attendant outputs and outcomes. Stakeholders collective shared understanding of what constitutes the problem, agreed strategic measures to address it as reflective of common resolve, willingness to learn, and aligning values and desires in ways that will translate into categories of services to target populations with associated benefits to society are essential. The reality of stakeholders’ engagement in addressing a complex public problem is, in some instances, constrained by fallible theories or concepts of elemental components. Still, the eventual development of clear goals and objectives set the stage for collective forward implementation actions for the greater good. This chapter details shared understanding as one of the collaborative process variables relevant to establishing collaborative governance and the relentless pursuit of an agreed mission for collective impact. The chapter identifies some elements associated with shared understanding with reflective practical cases and a model to promote conceptual understanding. It concludes with hypothetical concepts relative to the subject matter to encourage innovation in the joint creation of meanings and relevant solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agbodzakey, J. (2010). Collaborative governance and the implementation of the Ryan White Act: A case study of HIV health services planning councils in two South Florida counties. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG &KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agbodzakey, J. (2015). Ryan white CARE act and HIV/AIDS services collaborative governance: The South Florida experience. LAP/OmniScriptum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agbodzakey, J. K. (2017). Ryan white CARE act and collaborative governance re-examined: The South Florida experience. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agbodzakey, J. K. (2021). Leadership in collaborative governance: The case of HIV/AIDS health services planning council in South Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1051–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agbodzakey, J., & Taylor, L. (2019). Collaborative governance and role of the Grantee in HIV/AIDS health services: The Broward County of South Florida experience. International Review of Public Administration, 24(3), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. A., Comfort, M. E., & Weiner, B. J. (1998). Governance in public- private community health partnerships: A survey of the community care network demonstration sites. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8(4), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentrup, G. (2001). Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study of analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management, 27, 739–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichler, B. F., & Lösch, M. (2019). Collaborative governance in tourism: Empirical insights into a community-oriented destination. Sustainability, 11(23), 6673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buuren, A. V. (2009). Knowledge for governance, governance of knowledge: Inclusive knowledge management in collaborative governance processes. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 208–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. K. (2021). Public values and public participation: A case of collaborative governance of a planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Digitalcommons.usu.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elías, M. V., & Alkadry, M. G. (2011). Constructive conflict, participation, and shared governance. Administration & Society, 43(8), 869–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., Stutzman, H., Vedoveto, M., Delgado, D., Rivero, R., Quertehuari Dariquebe, W., et al. (2020). Collaborative governance and conflict management: Lessons learned and good practices from a case study in the Amazon Basin. Society & Natural Resources, 33(4), 538–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flye, M. E., Sponarski, C. C., Zydlewski, J. D., & McGreavy, B. (2021). Understanding collaborative governance from a communication network perspective: A case study of the Atlantic Salmon recovery framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 115, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Lubell, M. (2018). Collaborative governance of climate change adaptation across spatial and institutional scales. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 222–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Resources and Services Administration. (2013). Ryan white HIV/AIDS program Part A manual. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/HIV/AIDS Bureau. Retrieved on May 24, 2017 from https://hab.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hab/Global/happartamanual2013.pdf

  • Health Resources and Services Administration. (2016). Part A: Grants to eligible metropolitan and transitional areas. U.S. department of health and human services/HIV/AIDS bureau. Retrieved from May 27, 2017 from https://hab.hrsa.gov/about-ryan-white-hivaids-program/part-a-grants-emerging-metro-transitional-areas

  • Henderson, A., & Trede, F. (2017). Strengthening attainment of student learning outcomes during work-integrated learning: A collaborative governance framework across academia, industry and students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2019). Strategic CSR communication in social media: The effectiveness of stakeholder information, response, and involvement communication strategies factoring corporate reputation. Public Relations Journal, 12(4), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A., & Brüesch, C. (2020). Collaborative governance in program implementation: The development of e-relocation notification in the Swiss canton of Zurich. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(12), 1083–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, L., Rittner, J. L., Johnson, K. E., Gerteis, J., & Miller, T. (2017). Facilitative components of collaborative learning: A review of nine health research networks. Healthcare Policy, 12(3), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manring, S. L., & Pearsall, S. (2004). Creating an adaptive ecosystem management network among stakeholders of the lower Roanoke, North Carolina, USA. Ecology & Society, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 237–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, N., & Van Den Nouwelant, R. (2020). Western Sydney’s urban transformation: Examining the governance arrangements driving forward the growth vision. Australian Planner, 56(2), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, P. (2000). Is there space for organisation from below within the UK government’s action zones? A test of ‘collaborative planning’. Urban Studies, 37(8), 1261–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padiila, Y. C., & Daigle, L. E. (1998). Inter-agency collaboration in an international setting. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., & Hare, M. (2004). Processes of social learn- ing in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21(1), 369–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS and Resource Emergency (CARE) Act. (1990). Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://hab.hrsa.gov/livinghistory/timeline\1990.html

  • Tett, L., Crowther, J., & O’Hara, P. (2003). Collaborative partnerships in community education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Cristofoli, D., Gloor, P. A., Meijer, A. J., & Trivellato, B. (2020). Taming the snake in paradise: Combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation. Policy and Society, 39(4), 592–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T., & Ubels, H. (2016). How Dutch professionals conduct interactive design sessions to foster ‘shared understanding’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(3), 464–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, D. M., Segal, E. A., Johnston, E. W., & Vinze, A. (2017). Understanding the influence of power and empathic perspective-taking on collaborative natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 199, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2017). Types and institutional design principles of collaborative governance in a strong-government society: The case study of desertification control in northern China. International Public Management Journal, 20(4), 586–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurba, M., Sinclair, A. J., & Diduck, A. P. (2021). “Two-Row” cross-cultural learning for collaborative governance of forestland in northwestern Ontario, Canada. Regional Environmental Change, 21(2), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Leadership, University of North Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA

    James Agbodzakey

Authors
  1. James Agbodzakey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Agbodzakey, J. (2024). Shared Understanding in Collaborative Governance. In: Collaborative Governance Primer. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57373-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation