Skip to main content

The Institutional Turn in Corporate Governance Towards Addressing Corporate Externalities and Public Goods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Law and Economics of Justice (ILEC 2023)

Part of the book series: Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship ((EALELS,volume 17))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, the academic literature on corporate law and governance has cabined problems of externalities—unpriced economic effects on nonconsenting third parties—to other legal domains, such as tort law and employment law. However, the most critical private-ordering mechanisms of corporate governance, including executive compensation and takeover discipline, depend critically on market prices, which may be incomplete if externalities are present. The central argument of this chapter is that many corporate social responsibility efforts and ESG investments are in fact best understood as private-ordering responses to the information and incentive problems arising from corporate externality problems. Because externalities are ordinarily unpriced in market transactions, social enterprises that consider externalities in their decision-making face unique institutional challenges: information costs, coordination costs, and other transaction costs. Legal, institutional, and private-ordering developments are already advancing to meet these challenges. The chapter argues that an area ripe for future research is institutional and legal design that minimises information, transaction, and agency costs for coalitions of stockholders with similar preferences that seek to coordinate corporate production around non-financial objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Armour et al. (2017), p. 23.

  2. 2.

    Jensen (2001), p. 305.

  3. 3.

    See generally Ostrom (1990).

  4. 4.

    Rock (2021a, b), p. 371.

  5. 5.

    Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986). See also eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark, 16 A.3d 1, 34 (Del. Ch. 2010); Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919).

  6. 6.

    Jensen (2001), p. 302.

  7. 7.

    Hansmann (1988), pp. 273 et seqq.

  8. 8.

    Bainbridge (2023), p. 138.

  9. 9.

    See generally, Freeman (1984); Blair and Stout (1999); Blair (2012).

  10. 10.

    Jensen (2001), p. 298, Bainbridge (2023), p. 135.

  11. 11.

    Rock (2021a), p. 367.

  12. 12.

    Cornes and Sandler (1986).

  13. 13.

    Id.

  14. 14.

    Coase (1960).

  15. 15.

    Cornes and Sandler (1986).

  16. 16.

    Condon (2020), Hansen and Lott (1996).

  17. 17.

    Larry Fink, 2019 Letter to CEOs: Purpose and Profit, https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/2019-larry-fink-ceo-letter.

  18. 18.

    Hart and Zingales (2017).

  19. 19.

    United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2021), Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf.

  20. 20.

    Principles for Responsible Investment, https://www.unpri.org/about-us/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment.

  21. 21.

    Scott Hirst et al., How Much Do Investors Care About Social Responsibility? ECGI Law Working Paper No. 674/2023 (Jan. 2023), p. 4.

  22. 22.

    Jean-Francois Bonnefon, Augustin Landier, Parinitha Sastry and David Thesmar, Do Investors Care about Corporate Externalities? Experimental Evidence (Working Paper, TSE, MIT and HEC, 2019), p. 5.

  23. 23.

    Oliver Hart, David Thesmar, and Luigi Zingales, Private Sanctions (ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 866/2023, 2023), pp. 2 et seq.

  24. 24.

    Pershing Square Holdings, Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. 2020 Annual Report, 12–14 (2020).

  25. 25.

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Id.

  27. 27.

    Bosch, Bosch Builds Community, https://www.bosch.us/our-company/social-responsibility/

  28. 28.

    The Bosch Constitution, https://www.bosch-stiftung.de/en/bosch-constitution.

  29. 29.

    Carlsberg Group Frequently Asked Questions, Shares and Bonds https://www.carlsberggroup.com/investor-relations/investor-home/faq/#Governance.

  30. 30.

    Patagonia Works, Patagonia’s Next Chapter: Earth Is Now Our Only Stockholder, https://www.patagoniaworks.com/press/2022/9/14/patagonias-next-chapter-earth-is-now-our-only-stockholder.

  31. 31.

    Id.

  32. 32.

    Id.

  33. 33.

    See generally Edmans (2020).

  34. 34.

    Edmans (2023), p. 3.

  35. 35.

    Business Roundtable, Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, https://system.businessroundtable.org/app/uploads/sites/5/2023/02/WSJ_BRT_POC_Ad.pdf.

  36. 36.

    Id.

  37. 37.

    Larry Fink, 2019 Letter to CEOs: Purpose and Profit, https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/2019-larry-fink-ceo-letter.

  38. 38.

    Larry Fink, 2019 Letter to CEOs: The Power of Capitalism, https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter.

  39. 39.

    Nikitha Sattiraju, “Elliott Puts More Stress on ESG”, The Deal (Sept. 28, 2020), available at https://www.thedeal.com/activism/elliott-puts-more-stress-on-esg/.

  40. 40.

    Edmans (2011), p. 621.

  41. 41.

    Baruch Lev, Intangibles (working paper, 2018), p. 3.

  42. 42.

    Akerlof and Yellen (1990), p. 255.

  43. 43.

    Shleifer & Summers (1988).

  44. 44.

    Oliver Hart, David Thesmar, & Luigi Zingales, Private Sanctions (ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 866/2023, 2023), pp. 2 et seq.

  45. 45.

    Edmans (2012).

  46. 46.

    Crouzet et al. (2022), p. 30.

  47. 47.

    Bainbridge (2023), pp. 141 et seqq.; Jensen (2001), pp. 310 et seqq.

  48. 48.

    Arrow (1969).

  49. 49.

    For a leading account of governance arrangements that address externality and public goods problems outside of the corporate context, see Ostrom (1990).

  50. 50.

    Hansmann (1988), pp. 273 et seq.

  51. 51.

    Shapiro and Stiglitz (1984).

  52. 52.

    Hansmann and Kraakman (2001), p. 439.

  53. 53.

    See, e.g., Hart and Zingales (2022); Bainbridge (2023); Bebchuk and Tallarita (2020); Rock (2021a); Rock (2021b).

  54. 54.

    Rock (2021b) p. 28; Brakman Reiser (2013).

  55. 55.

    See generally Fisch and Davidoff Solomon (2021).

  56. 56.

    See generally Winston (2018).

  57. 57.

    Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor, Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Stockholder Rights, 87 Fed. Reg. 73,822 (2023).

  58. 58.

    Michael B. Dorff et al. (2021), p. 147.

  59. 59.

    Eldar (2020).

  60. 60.

    Eldar (2017).

  61. 61.

    See e.g., Bebchuk L, Tallarita R (2022), The Perils and Questionable Promise of ESG-Based Compensation (working paper).

  62. 62.

    Curtis et al. (2021), p. 393.

  63. 63.

    Coffee (2021).

  64. 64.

    Coffee (1984), p. 722.

  65. 65.

    Gold and Miller (2018).

  66. 66.

    Blasius Indus., Inc. v. Atlas Corp., 564 A.2d 651 (Del. Ch. 1988).

  67. 67.

    Rock (2021b).

Bibliography

  • Akerlof GA, Yellen J (1990) The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quart J Econ 105(2):255–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour J, Enriques L, Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2017) What is corporate law? In: Kraakman R, Armour J, Davies P, Enriques L, Hansmann H, Hertig G, Hopt K, Kanda H, Pargendler M, Ringe WG, Rock E (eds) The anatomy of corporate law, 3d ed, Oxford, 1-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1969) The organization of economic activity: issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non market allocation. In: Congress of the United States, The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: the PPB system 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge S (2023) The profit motive, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk LA, Tallarita R (2020) The illusory promise of stakeholder governance. Cornell Law Rev 106:91–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair M, Stout L (1999) A team production theory of corporate law. Univ Virginia Law Rev 85(2):247–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M (2012) The stockholder value myth, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC Jr (1984) Market failure and the economic case for a mandatory disclosure system. Virginia Law Rev 70:717–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC Jr (2021) The future of disclosure: ESG, common ownership, and systematic risk, Columbia. Business Law Rev 2:602–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon M (2020) Externalities and the common owner. Univ Washington Law Rev 95(1):1–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes R, Sandler T (1996) The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods, Cambridge, 2d ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouzet N, Eberly JC, Eisfeldt AL, Papanikoulaou D (2022) The economics of intangible capital. J Econ Perspect 36(3):29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis Q, Fisch J, Robertson A (2021) Do ESG funds deliver on their promises? Mich Law Rev 120:393–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorff MB, Hicks J, Solomon SD (2021) The future or fancy? An empirical study of public benefit corporations. Harvard Bus Law Rev 11(13):113–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmans A (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? employee satisfaction and equity prices. J Financ Econ 101:621–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmans A (2012) The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Perspect 26:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmans A (2023) The end of ESG. Financ Manage 52(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmans A (2020) Grow the pie, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldar O (2017) The role of social enterprise and hybrid organizations. Columbia Bus Law Rev 2017(1):92–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldar O (2020) Designing business to pursue social goals. Univ Virginia Law Rev 106(4):937–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch J, Davidoff Solomon S (2021) The “Value” of a public benefit corporation, in: Pollman E, Thompson RB (eds) research handbook on corporate purpose and personhood, Northhampton, 68–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold AS, Miller PB (2018) Fiduciary duties in social enterprise, in: Means B, Yockey JW (eds) The Cambridge handbook of social enterprise law, Cambrigde, 321–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RG, Lott JR Jr (1996) Externalities and corporate objectives in a world with diversified stockholders/consumers. J Financ Quant Anal 31(1):43–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H (1998) Ownership of the firm journal of law. Econ Organ 4(2):267–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2001) The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law J 89:439–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart O, Zingales L (2017) Companies should maximize stockholder welfare not market value. J Law Financ Account 2:247–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O, Zingales L (2022) The new corporate governance university of Chicago. Bus Law Rev 1:195–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeb F, Kolbel J, Paetzold F, Zeisberger S (2022) Do investors care about impact? Rev Financ Stud 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (2010) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Eur Financ Manag 7(3):297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P (2021) Corporate personality, purpose, and liability, in: Pollman E, Thompson RB (eds) research handbook on corporate purpose and personhood, Northhampton, 222–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser DB (2013) Theorizing forms for social enterprise. Emory Law J 62:681–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock E (2021a) For whom is the corporation managed in 2020? The debate over corporate purpose. Bus Lawyer 76:363–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock E (2021b) Research handbook on corporate purpose and personhood. In: Pollman E, Thompson RB (ed) Research handbook on corporate purpose and personhood, Northhampton, 27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C, Stiglitz JE (1984) Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Am Econ Rev 74(3):433–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Summers LH (1988) Breach of trust in hostile takeovers, in: Auerbach AJ (ed) corporate takeovers: causes and consequences, Chicago, 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston E (2018) Benefit corporations and the separation of benefits and control. Cardozo L Rev 39:1783–1841

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research underlying this chapter benefited greatly from the support of Notre Dame Law School and the helpful comments of participants at the Lucerne Conference on Law and Economics and the Brigham Young University Winter Deals Conference. Silvio Pantoja provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Corrigan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Corrigan, P.M. (2024). The Institutional Turn in Corporate Governance Towards Addressing Corporate Externalities and Public Goods. In: Mathis, K., Tor, A. (eds) Law and Economics of Justice. ILEC 2023. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56822-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56822-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56821-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56822-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics