You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
-
The high-risk genotype for human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer, is higher among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women.
-
The uptake of HPV screening among AI/AN women is below the US national average.
-
The incidence of cervical cancer is subject to Tribal variation and is higher among some groups of AI/AN women.
-
Cervical cancer mortality is higher among AI/AN women than NHW women.
-
Self-sampling for HPV testing offers advantages and is preferred by women. Primary HPV testing is likely to be presented for approval in the USA, allowing this method to become available to AI/AN women.
The United States is home to over 570 federally recognized Tribes who speak about 150 Tribal languages. The majority (54%) of the American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) population live in rural and small-town areas, while 30% live in suburban and exurban areas and 16% in urban areas [1]. Approximately 68% of the AI/AN population live on or near reservations or Tribal lands. In the context of AI/AN healthcare access, purchased/referred care delivery areas (PRCDAs) are counties that contain federally recognized Tribal lands or are adjacent to Tribal lands and to the Indian Health Service. Figure 42.1 shows the geographic distribution of PRCDAs [2]. A great deal of AI/AN healthcare is centered in community and Tribal centers, with a focus on healthy food and water sources and on creating local health awareness for disease prevention [3].
Primary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: HPV Vaccination
Cervical cancer prevention begins with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake. A Cherokee Nation Health Services survey indicates that 71% of adolescents in the PRCDA have received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine [4]. However, the predominant high-risk HPV genotype across two separate AI communities was HPV 51, which is not included in the current HPV vaccine [5]. Likewise, prevalent HPV infection rates for women over 30 years old are higher among Great Plains Native American Tribal women than the general US population, with 35% of the Great Plains population testing positive for at least one high-risk HPV type [6]. In 2011, South Dakota AI/AN were reported to have a 42% HPV prevalent infection rate, with 32% of the HPV infections not vaccine-preventable types. This is significantly higher than the non-Hispanic White (NHW) comparison population [7]. The risk of cervical cancer may or may not be inherently higher for AI women as the HPV vaccination does not protect them from their most common forms of HPV infection. As such, AIs rely on screening as the next step in early detection and treatment.
HPV in the general population does not reflect HPV genotype distribution in the cervical cancer population [8]. Many common infections do not progress to the cancer stage. While HPV 16, 18, and 31 are relatively uncommon in general infections, they are the dominant types in cancers. HPV genotypes taken from the cervical cancer population among AN women between 1980 and 2007 (prevaccination) indicated the presence of HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 39, 45, 58, 59, 73, and 82 with no HPV detected in 8% (5/62) of specimens [9]. This set of cervical cancers did not detect HPV 51.
Secondary Prevention: Historical Cytology Screening Results
In the past, cervical cancer screening was cytology dominated, with only recent advances that base the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN 3+) on persistent high-risk HPV infection. Cytologic changes visually represent biochemical changes within the host, and viral DNA post-HPV infection and are necessarily subjective. Screening studies, to date, are based predominantly on women attending screening events and do not report the distribution of cytologic abnormalities for the AI/AN population.
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) was formally extended to AI/AN in 1993 [10, 11], with funding for 11 Tribal programs. In the 20 years between 1991 and 2012, almost 160,000 AI/AN women were screened with cytology, resulting in 2301 cases of CIN 2+ (1.4% of screened women) and 98 invasive cancers (0.06% of screened women). Between 1991 and 2012, cytology was used as the primary screen, using HPV triage for women with a cytology result of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). In the NBCCEDP between 2009 and 2011, AI/AN women with an ASCUS cytology result had the highest rate (56%) of HPV-positive ASCUS results of any race, 15 points higher than other races/ethnicities. Most importantly, 25% did not return for any follow-up, which was almost double the rate of no-follow-up for other races/ethnicities [12]. The lack of follow-up among AI/AN women was 14% when the level of cytologic abnormality extended to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), with a higher attendance at colposcopy [13].
Uptake of Screening Remains Low
Screening rates, including HPV testing in some programs, from 2011 to 2019 for Pacific Northwest AI/AN women reveal a nonimproving rate of between 57% and 62%, which is below the US national average of 73.5%. In addition, AI/AN women aged 50–64 years have the lowest cervical cancer screening rate [14]. Tribal variations show the lowest screening rates among AI/AN women in the Northern Plains (46%), followed by the Pacific Coast (49%) and the Southwest (52%) [15]. Screening result data are not available.
Cervical Cancer Incidence Remains High
PRCDA county data from over 10 years of cytology-based screening from 1999 to 2009 revealed a 1.5-fold increase in the incidence of cervical cancer (11/100,000 among AI/AN vs. 7.1/100,000 among NHW), with Tribal variation: women from the Northern Plains have the highest increased relative incidence (1.97) compared to NHW, followed by AN women from Alaska (1.94) and from Southern Plains (1.64), Southwest (1.19), and Pacific Northwest (1.36) Tribes [16, 17]. No cervical cancer incidence inequities were found among East Coast Tribes. Between 2001 and 2008, a similar proportion of AI/AN (22%) and NHW (21%) women on Medicaid were diagnosed with late-stage cervical cancer [18].
From 2014 to 2018, the incidence of cervical cancer worsened to 11.5 vs. 7.4/100,000, with AI/AN women having a 56% higher rate of cervical cancer incidence in PRCDA counties than NHW women [15]. Specifically, AI/AN women 35–49 years had a 1.5-fold increase in cervical cancer incidence over NHW women, and AI/AN women 50–64 years had a 1.8-fold increase in incidence rate [19]. AI/AN Tribal disparities continue, with Northern Plains and Pacific Tribes having nearly twice the rate of cervical cancer incidence as Alaska and Southern Plains AI/AN and 1.6-fold higher incidence as NHW [20].
Between 1999 and 2018, at 3.7/100,000, cervical cancer was the third most common cancer among adolescent and young adult (AYA) AI/AN females aged 15–29 years, after thyroid cancer and lymphoma [21]. Among 30- to 39-year-old AI/AN women, cervical cancer incidence is 18.1/100,000, which is significantly higher than the general US population rate of 7.1/100,000. In contrast, among this same demographic of AI/AN women, breast cancer incidence is 40.2/100,000 and thyroid cancer is 23.7/100,000 [21]. Cervical cancer incidence rates per 100,000 AYA AI/AN women vary by Tribal affiliation, with Southern Plains women having the highest incidence (14.7), followed by Alaska (13.2), Northern Plains (10.6), Pacific Coast (10.6), East Coast (7.8), and Southwest (5.3). Incidence trends did not change over this 20-year period.
By 2018, the incidence of cervical cancer among AI/AN women had increased by 0.6%, at a rate higher than all cancers combined among the AI/AN population [15]. In addition, AI/AN women present with later-stage cervical cancer than NHW women, with a 1.8-fold increase at the regional stage and a 2.4 increase in the distant stage at diagnosis compared to NHW women [15, 19]. Urban Indian Health Organizations (UIHO) data from 2008 to 2017 reveal that AI/AN women living in UIHO service areas had a 1.5-fold increase in the risk of cervical cancer compared to NWH urban counterparts, with Tribal inequities showing Alaskan AI/AN women at the greatest relative risk over NHW (2.0), followed by AI/AN women in the Northern Plains (1.8), Pacific Coast (1.6), Southern Plains (1.5), and Southwest (1.3) [22]. The significantly elevated relative risk of cervical cancer among AI/AN in urban areas (1.7-fold higher than urban NHW) was lower than in four Tribal regions, where the relative risk in Tribe-specific urban AI/AN women vs. NHW urban women is Pacific Coast (2.2), Northern Plains (2.1), Alaska (1.7), and Southern Plains (1.7) [23]. Only the East and Southwest Tribes had lower incidence.
Cervical Cancer Mortality Remains High
In parallel, cervical cancer mortality from 1999 to 2009 was twice as high among AI/AN as NHW (4.2/100,000 vs. US national rate 2.1/100,000), with AI/AN women aged 65–84 years having a 10/100,000 mortality rate (2.8-fold higher than NHW). Those older than 84 had a 23.7/100,000 mortality rate (6.1-fold higher than NHW) [17]. Again, rates varied between Tribal communities, with the highest relative mortality rate in the Northern Plains (4.2), Southwest (2.1), and Southern Plains (1.6), compared to NHW women, while relative rates of cervical cancer among the Eastern and Pacific Northwest Tribes, and Alaska Natives did not differ to those of the NHW population [17]. Up to 2019, mortality from cervical cancer remained 64% higher among AI/AN than NHW women and 2.9-fold higher for AI/AN women aged 50–64 years than for NHW women in the same age category [15, 19].
Screening Now Relies on More Accurate HPV Biomarkers
HPV detection is now a fundamental necessity in cervical cancer screening. The HPV genotypes requiring immediate referral to colposcopy are HPV 16, 18, and 31 [24]. Among AI/AN studies, the most common HPV genotypes, in descending order, are HPV 51, 58, 18, 52, 31, 66, 16, 56, 68, 59, 45, 39, 35, and 33 [6, 25]. The three highest-risk HPV types are present among AI/AN women. Other than prevalent epidemiologic studies on high-risk HPV genotypes in AI/AN populations, there are no data describing the results of a cervical cancer screening process based on HPV testing in the AI/AN population [26].
The Last Mile Initiative is a US-based National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored trial to bring self-screening with primary HPV testing to women, regardless of race/ethnicity, to remove the barriers of the speculum exam and physician appointments. Piloted work carried out among several underserved populations reveals specific narratives for both the lack of screening uptake and the advantages of self-screening.
Primary themes from women involved in the pilot include the ease of collecting a vaginal sample, preference for HPV self-testing over the speculum exam, and positive recommendations to friends/relatives to use self-sampling for cervical cancer screening [25]. Nine countries (Albania, Kenya, Guatemala, Honduras, Malaysia, Netherlands, Peru, Rwanda, and Uganda) have introduced self-screening with primary HPV testing for all women, while eight countries (Argentina, Australia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Myanmar, and Sweden) have introduced self-screening with primary HPV testing for underscreened populations, in addition to an option for well-screened populations [27].
Within a short time, self-sampling for primary HPV testing is likely to be presented to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval in the United States, allowing this most popular method of cervical cancer screening to be available to AI/AN women.
References
Dewees S, Marks B. Research Note #2: Twice Invisible: Understanding Rural Native America. First Nations Development Institute; 2017 Apr [cited 2023 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.usetinc.org/wp-content/uploads/bvenuti/WWS/2017/May%202017/May%208/Twice%20Invisible%20-%20Research%20Note.pdf
Melkonian SC, Henley SJ, Senkomago V, Thomas CC, Jim MA, Apostolou A, et al. Cancers Associated with Human Papillomavirus in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations – United States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(37):1283-7. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6937a2
First Nations Development Institute. 2021 Annual Report: Moving Forward. 2021 [cited 2023 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.firstnations.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FN-Annual-Report-2021-low-res.pdf
Gopalani SV, Janitz AE, Burkhart M, Campbell JE, Chen S, Martinez SA, et al. HPV vaccination coverage and factors among American Indians in Cherokee Nation. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34(3):267-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01662-y
Morales CG, Jimenez NR, Herbst-Kralovetz MM, Lee NR. Novel Vaccine Strategies and Factors to Consider in Addressing Health Disparities of HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer Development among Native American Women. Med Sci (Basel). 2022;10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10030052
Lee NR, Winer RL, Cherne S, Noonan CJ, Nelson L, Gonzales AA, et al. Human Papillomavirus Prevalence Among American Indian Women of the Great Plains. J Infect Dis. 2019;219(6):908-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy600
Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Bell MC, Muller CJ, Maher DM, Chauhan SC, Buchwald DS. HPV infection among rural American Indian women and urban white women in South Dakota: an HPV prevalence study. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:252. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-252
Leinonen MK, Anttila A, Malila N, Dillner J, Forslund O, Nieminen P. Type- and age-specific distribution of human papillomavirus in women attending cervical cancer screening in Finland. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(11):2941-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.647
Kelly JJ, Unger ER, Dunne EF, Murphy NJ, Tiesinga J, Koller KR, et al. HPV genotypes detected in cervical cancers from Alaska Native women, 1980-2007. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013;72. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21115
Espey D, Castro G, Flagg T, Landis K, Henderson JA, Benard VB, et al. Strengthening breast and cervical cancer control through partnerships: American Indian and Alaska Native Women and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer. 2014;120 Suppl 16:2557-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28824
Lee NC, Wong FL, Jamison PM, Jones SF, Galaska L, Brady KT, et al. Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning. Cancer. 2014;120 Suppl 16(0 16):2540-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28820
Watson M, Benard V, Lin L, Rockwell T, Royalty J. Provider management of equivocal cervical cancer screening results among underserved women, 2009-2011: follow-up of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(5):759-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0549-9
Benard VB, Lawson HW, Eheman CR, Anderson C, Helsel W. Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1323-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000159549.56601.75
Bruegl AS, Emerson J, Tirumala K. Persistent disparities of cervical cancer among American Indians/Alaska natives: Are we maximizing prevention tools? Gynecol Oncol. 2023;168:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.007
Kratzer TB, Jemal A, Miller KD, Nash S, Wiggins C, Redwood D, et al. Cancer statistics for American Indian and Alaska Native individuals, 2022: Including increasing disparities in early onset colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(2):120-46. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21757
Gopalani SV, Janitz AE, Campbell JE. Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Oklahoma and the United States, 1999-2013. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;56:140-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.008
Watson M, Benard V, Thomas C, Brayboy A, Paisano R, Becker T. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2009. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:S415-22. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301681
Adams SV, Burnett-Hartman AN, Karnopp A, Bansal A, Cohen SA, Warren-Mears V, et al. Cancer Stage in American Indians and Alaska Natives Enrolled in Medicaid. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(3):368-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.016
Bruegl AS, Joshi S, Batman S, Weisenberger M, Munro E, Becker T. Gynecologic cancer incidence and mortality among American Indian/Alaska Native women in the Pacific Northwest, 1996-2016. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(3):686-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.033
Melkonian SC, Weir HK, Jim MA, Preikschat B, Haverkamp D, White MC. Incidence of and Trends in the Leading Cancers With Elevated Incidence Among American Indian and Alaska Native Populations, 2012-2016. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(4):528-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa222
Melkonian SC, Chen L, Jim MA, Haverkamp D, King JB. Disparities in incidence and trends of colorectal, lung, female breast, and cervical cancers among non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native people, 1999-2018. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34(8):657-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01705-y
Melkonian SC, Jim MA, Pete D, Poel A, Dominguez AE, Echo-Hawk A, et al. Cancer disparities among non-Hispanic urban American Indian and Alaska Native populations in the United States, 1999-2017. Cancer. 2022;128(8):1626-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34122
Melkonian SC, Jim MA, Haverkamp D, Wiggins CL, McCollum J, White MC, et al. Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Trends among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 2010-2015. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(10):1604-11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0288
Bonde JH, Sandri MT, Gary DS, Andrews JC. Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000494
Winer RL, Gonzales AA, Noonan CJ, Cherne SL, Buchwald DS, Collaborative to Improve Native Cancer O. Assessing Acceptability of Self-Sampling Kits, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Human Papillomavirus Infection in American Indian Women. J Community Health. 2016;41(5):1049-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0189-3
Whop LJ, Smith MA, Butler TL, Adcock A, Bartholomew K, Goodman MT, et al. Achieving cervical cancer elimination among Indigenous women. Prev Med. 2021;144:106314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106314
Serrano B, Ibanez R, Robles C, Peremiquel-Trillas P, de Sanjose S, Bruni L. Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. Prev Med. 2022;154:106900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106900
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harper, D.M., Roubidoux, M.A. (2024). Cervical Cancer Prevention Among American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples. In: Garvey, G. (eds) Indigenous and Tribal Peoples and Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56806-0_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56806-0_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56805-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56806-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)