Skip to main content

Power System Transient Stability Prediction in the Face of Cyber Attacks: Employing LSTM-AE to Combat Falsified PMU Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dependable Computing – EDCC 2024 Workshops (EDCC 2024)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 2078))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

Phasor measurement units (PMUs) are essential instruments in delivering real-time data crucial for monitoring the dynamics of power systems. They are widely used in transient stability prediction (TSP), significantly contributing to the effective maintenance of power systems post-contingency stability. The accuracy and reliability of data derived from PMUs are crucial for the effective execution of TSP. However, the PMU data is at risk of being compromised by false data injection (FDI) attacks. Such vulnerabilities could lead to a significant degradation in the reliability of the data, potentially resulting in the misdirection of algorithms tailored for TSP. In response to this challenge, this article presents a resilient approach for TSP capable of functioning effectively under FDI attacks. Utilizing a long short-term memory autoencoder (LSTM-AE), our proposed method is engineered to proficiently capture and learn the normative spatial and temporal correlations and patterns present in time-series PMU data, across both steady-state and transient operational states. Consequently, this approach facilitates the algorithmic reconstruction and rectification of PMU measurements that have been compromised due to FDI, thereby upholding the robustness of the TSP process in the face of cyber threats. The performance of the proposed method is validated using the IEEE 39-bus system, subjected to a wide array of scenarios. This rigorous testing demonstrates the algorithm's robustness and effectiveness in maintaining accurate TSP in scenarios where the integrity of PMU data is professionally compromised to avoid easy detection or reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Muir, A., Lopatto, J.: Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: causes and recommendations (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Makarov, Y.V., Reshetov, V.I., Stroev, A., Voropai, I.: Blackout prevention in the United States, Europe, and Russia. Proc. IEEE 93, 1942–1955 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Behdadnia, T., Yaslan, Y., Genc, I.: A new method of decision tree based transient stability assessment using hybrid simulation for real-time PMU measurements. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 15, 678–693 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie, J., Sun, W.: A transfer and deep learning-based method for online frequency stability assessment and Control. IEEE Access 9, 75712–75721 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Q., Lin, N., Bu, S., Wang, H., Zhang, B.: Interpretable time-adaptive transient stability assessment based on dual-stage attention mechanism. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 38, 2776–2790 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behdadnia, T., Parlak, M.: EV-integrated power system transient stability prediction based on imaging time series and Deep Neural Network. In: 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siamak, S., Dehghani, M., Mohammadi, M.: Dynamic GPS spoofing attack detection, localization, and measurement correction exploiting PMU and SCADA. IEEE Syst. J. 15, 2531–2540 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reda, H.T., Anwar, A., Mahmood, A.: Comprehensive survey and taxonomies of false data injection attacks in smart grids: attack models, targets, and impacts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 163, 112423 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behdadnia, T., Deconinck, G.: A new deep learning-based strategy for launching timely DOS attacks in PMU-based Cyber-Physical Power Systems. In: 2022 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Behdadnia, T., Thoelen, K., Zobiri, F., Deconinck, G.: Leveraging deep learning to increase the success rate of DOS attacks in PMU-based automatic generation control systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 1–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3342413

  11. Zhang, J., Chu, Z., Sankar, L., Kosut, O.: False data injection attacks on phasor measurements that bypass low-rank decomposition. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chu, Z., Zhang, J., Kosut, O., Sankar, L.: Unobservable false data injection attacks against pmus: feasible conditions and multiplicative attacks. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alexopoulos, T.A., Korres, G.N., Manousakis, N.M.: Complementarity reformulations for false data injection attacks on PMU-only state estimation. Electric Power Syst. Res. 189, 106796 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu, Z., Zhang, J., Kosut, O., Sankar, L.: N-1 reliability makes it difficult for false data injection attacks to cause physical consequences. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 36, 3897–3906 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Almasabi, S., et al.: A novel technique to detect false data injection attacks on phasor measurement units. Sensors 21, 5791 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Almasabi, S., et al.: False data injection detection for phasor measurement units. Sensors 22, 3146 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khare, G., Mohapatra, A., Singh, S.N.: A real-time approach for detection and correction of false data in PMU measurements. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 191, 106866 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pai, M.A.: Energy Function Analysis for Power System Stability. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. DSATools Dynamic Security Assessment Software. http://www.dsatools.com. Accessed 25 Jan 2024

  20. Aygul, K., Mohammadpourfard, M., Kesici, M., Kucuktezcan, F., Genc, I.: Benchmark of machine learning algorithms on transient stability prediction in renewable rich power grids under cyber-attacks. Internet Things 25, 101012 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benyamin Jafari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jafari, B., Yazici, M.A. (2024). Power System Transient Stability Prediction in the Face of Cyber Attacks: Employing LSTM-AE to Combat Falsified PMU Data. In: Sangchoolie, B., Adler, R., Hawkins, R., Schleiss, P., Arteconi, A., Mancini, A. (eds) Dependable Computing – EDCC 2024 Workshops. EDCC 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2078. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56776-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56776-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56775-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56776-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics