Skip to main content

Defining the Debate in Political Theology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vatican II on Church-State Relations
  • 4 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the contours and dividing lines of the debate in Anglophone Christian political theology, the definitions of which (as we shall see) are contentious, so that the Council’s teachings on church-state relations can be located in terms of that debate. Once it is determined which views in that debate are most like the Council’s teachings, it becomes possible to see whether the criticisms aimed at those views can also be applied to the Council, thus enabling us to assess the adequacy of its teachings in subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For examples of the different ways Augustine and Aquinas have been compared and contrasted, see: (Gregory and Clair 2015; Cavanaugh 2020; Tranter 2020, pp. 188–190).

Bibliography

  • Bauerschmidt, F.C. 2001. The Politics of Disenchantment. New Blackfriars 82 (965/966): 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. 1995. The Non-Catholic Character of the “Public Church”. Modern Theology 11 (2): 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.M. 2004. State and Civil Society. In Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, ed. P. Scott and W.T. Cavanaugh, 423–438. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Liberation Theology After the End of History: The Refusal to Cease Suffering. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M.J.S. 2014. Political Augustinianism: Modern Interpretations of Augustine’s Political Thought. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, W.T. 2020. Ecclesial Ethics and the Gospel Sine Glossa: Sacramental Politics and the Love of the World. Modern Theology 36 (3): 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, C. 1977. Authority and Community: The Contributions of Carl Friedrich, Yves R. Simon, and Michael Polanyi. The American Political Science Review 71 (2): 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.W. 1985. The Theology of Freedom: The Legacy of Jacques Maritain and Reinhold Niebuhr. Macon: Mercer University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, H. 1963. The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, T. 1958. Principality and Polity: Aquinas and the Rise of State Theory in the West. London: Longman, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, E. 2008. Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, E., and J. Clair. 2015. Augustinianisms and Thomisms. In Cambridge Companion to Christian Political Theology, ed. C. Hovey and E. Phillips, 176–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hauerwas, S. 1981. A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic. London: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. On Keeping Theological Ethics Theological. In Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy, ed. S. Hauerwas and A. MacIntyre, 16–42. London: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Notes. In A Better Hope: Resources for a Church Confronting Capitalism, Democracy, and Postmodernity, 217–282. Grand Rapids: Brazos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. A Christian Critique of Christian America. In The Hauerwas Reader, ed. J. Berkman and M. Cartwright, 459–480. London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D.S. 2018. Augustinian and Ecclesial Christian Ethics: On Loving Enemies. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. 1944. The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness. New York: Charles Scribner’s sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. Volume II: Human Destiny. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. 2012. Political Theology: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson, A. 1994. The Church as Polis: From Political Theology to Theological Politics as Exemplified by Jürgen Moltmann and Stanley Hauerwas. Lund: Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Ecclesiology and Ethics: The Difficulties of Ecclesial Moral Reflection. The Ecumenical Review 52 (2): 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschenbusch, W. 1945. A Theology for the Social Gospel. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. The Righteousness of the Kingdom. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J.B.B. 2019. The Neoconservatives and the Pope: Misreading John Paul II in George Weigel’s Biographies. Political Theology 20 (1): 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. 2004. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, S. 2020. Oliver O’Donovan’s Moral Theology: Tensions and Triumphs. London: T&T Clark.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W.J. 2009. Reinhold Niebuhr’s Doctrine of Man. In Reinhold Niebuhr: His Religious, Social, and Political Thought, ed. C.W. Kegley, 305–326. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Y. Ciftci .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ciftci, M.Y. (2024). Defining the Debate in Political Theology. In: Vatican II on Church-State Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56706-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics