Skip to main content

Predictive Deep Learning: An Analysis of Inception V3, VGG16, and VGG19 Models for Breast Cancer Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing (IACC 2023)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 2054))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

Breast cancer is a major contributor to cancer-related death in women. A higher likelihood of survival could result from early detection if the patient could receive the appropriate medicine while it is still in its early stages. Most often, a medical professional will use medical imaging or manual physical analysis to make a diagnosis. These efforts might be drastically cut with an automated approach. Using deep learning approaches, this paper proposes a system for autonomously analyzing ultrasound pictures. Using data obtained from the web repository Kaggle, three deep learning models—InceptionV3, VGG16, and VGG19—are applied to validate the suggested method. With the help of a confusion matrix and accuracy metrics, we compare the outcomes produced by these three deep learning methods. With an accuracy rate of 99.75%, the InceptionV3 model proved to be the most effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mohammed, A., Kora, R.: A comprehensive review on ensemble deep learning: opportunities and challenges. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 35(2) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.01.014

  2. MarrĂłn-Esquivel, J.M., Duran-Lopez, L., Linares-Barranco, A., Dominguez-Morales, J.P.: A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 159, 106856 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106856

  3. Khan, S., Islam, N., Jan, Z., Din, I.U., Rodrigues, J.J.C.: A novel deep learning based framework for the detection and classification of breast cancer using transfer learning. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.022

  4. Aslani, S., Jacob, J.: Utilisation of deep learning for COVID-19 diagnosis. Clin. Radiol. 78(2) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2022.11.006

  5. Maleki, A., Raahemi, M., Nasiri, H.: Breast cancer diagnosis from histopathology images using deep neural network and XGBoost. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105152

  6. Pineda, J., et al.: Geometric deep learning reveals the spatiotemporal features of microscopic motion. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5(1) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00595-0

  7. Gupta, S., Gupta, M.K.: A comparative analysis of deep learning approaches for predicting breast cancer survivability. Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 29(5) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09679-3

  8. Yadavendra, S.C.: A comparative study of breast cancer tumor classification by classical machine learning methods and deep learning method. Mach. Vis. Appl. 31(6) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-020-01094-1

  9. Shahidi, F., Daud, S.M., Abas, H., Ahmad, N.A., Maarop, N.: Breast cancer classification using deep learning approaches and histopathology image: a comparison study. IEEE Access 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029881

  10. Hamed, G., Marey, M.A.E.R., Amin, S.E. S., Tolba, M.F.: Deep learning in breast cancer detection and classification Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. (2020)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_30

  11. Parvin, F., Al Mehedi Hasan, M.: A comparative study of different types of convolutional neural networks for breast cancer histopathological image classification. In: 2020 IEEE Region 10 Symposium, TENSYMP 2020 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/TENSYMP50017.2020.9230787

  12. Li, Z., Liu, F., Yang, W., Peng, S., Zhou, J.: A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33(12) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827

  13. Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R.K.G., Togashi, K.: Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights into Imaging 9(4) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9

  14. Acharya, U.R., et al.: A deep convolutional neural network model to classify heartbeats. Comput. Biol. Med. 89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.022

  15. “kaggle ultrasound” (2023) Accessed on 20 Aug 2023. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/aryashah2k/breast-ultrasound-images-dataset

  16. Wang, C., et al.: Pulmonary image classification based on inception-v3 transfer learning model. IEEE Access 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946000

  17. Mascarenhas, S., Agarwal, M.: A comparison between VGG16, VGG19 and ResNet50 architecture frameworks for Image Classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Disruptive Technologies for Multi-Disciplinary Research and Applications, CENTCON 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/CENTCON52345.2021.9687944

  18. Qassim, H., Verma, A., Feinzimer, D.: Compressed residual-VGG16 CNN model for big data places image recognition. In: 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, CCWC 2018 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC.2018.8301729

  19. Dey, N., Zhang, Y.D., Rajinikanth, V., Pugalenthi, R., Raja, N.S.M.: Customized VGG19 architecture for pneumonia detection in chest X-Rays. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.12.010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanika Kansal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kansal, K., Sharma, S. (2024). Predictive Deep Learning: An Analysis of Inception V3, VGG16, and VGG19 Models for Breast Cancer Detection. In: Garg, D., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Gupta, S.K., Cheng, X., Sarao, P., Patel, G.S. (eds) Advanced Computing. IACC 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2054. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56703-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56703-2_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56702-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56703-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics