Abstract
Coworking spaces (CSs) have been demonstrating their ability to act as multifunctional, safe, and healthy hubs. Over the last decade, there has been a boom all over the world, especially in developed countries. On the contrary, developing countries still lag behind in implementing such spaces. However, coworking spaces may significantly contribute to the economic and social progress of developing countries that have been challenging several issues resulting from rapid urbanization and difficult living and working conditions, mainly in peripheral areas. The main aim of the study is to explore how coworking spaces can contribute to solving these problems in the peripheries, which can attract people after the pandemic, considering the move out of the biggest cities and the increase in employees and freelancers working remotely. Firstly, the study presents a general overview of coworking spaces in both Western Europe and Eastern Europe, including Norway, Italy, Russia, and Albania. Then, the study discusses possible scenarios for the expansion of coworking spaces in urban peripheries and peripheral areas that would be beneficial for the local communities and economy, and it would fill a void in the current provision of these service spaces throughout the territory. The study suggests designing a prototype for an educational and coworking hub that can be quickly installed in the urban peripheries. The prototype for coworking will be based on standardized construction, be easy to build in multiple locations, and include all necessary infrastructures. In order to design such a project, it would be necessary to conduct a step-by-step process of analysis of case studies, including construction methods such as containers and prefabricated elements that respond to community needs and would make the construction possible in a short time. Thus, the idea would be to create a coworking unit, or “hub”, that can be replicated in various peripheries. These types of hubs can also combine coworking and coliving functions. As a conclusion, these prototypes of “plug-in coworking spaces” could be scalable in multiple marginal areas and disadvantaged neighborhoods after the pandemic. Being spread in peripheral areas and small towns, these centers may become social catalysts and create multiple activities that can be beneficial for large groups of populations and may change living, working, and mobility patterns after the pandemic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AIM (2019) Analysis of the market of flexible working spaces in Moscow. Agency of Innovation of Moscow, Moscow
Belova L (2018) Coworking fashion hooked the businesses. Kommersant, 29 Nov, p 16
Berbegal-Mirabent J (2021) What do we know about co-working spaces? Trends and challenges ahead. Sustainability 13:1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031416
Di Marino M, Chavoshi H, Andersen T, Nenonen S (2023) The future of multilocational work and New Working Spaces in small and medium-sized urban municipalities and in rural municipalities: a Norwegian perspective. Norwegian J Geogr. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00291951.2023.2249480
Di Marino M, Lapintie K (2017) Emerging workplaces in post-functionalist cities. J Urban Technol 24:3: 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1297520
Di Marino M, Mariotti I (2020) 5.2. Location factors of NeWSps in the peripheries
Di Marino M, Tomaz E, Henriques C, Chavoshi HS (2022) 15 Minute city concept and new working spaces: a planning perspective from Oslo and Lisbon (forthcoming)
Dmitrieva D (2020) Pandemic will become a trigger for the development of coworkings in Saint-Petersburg, DP.ru, 5 Aug
Italian Coworking (2020) I numeri del coworking in Italia. Retrieved from: https://www.italiancoworking.it/i-numeri-del-coworking-in-italia/#:~:text=Si%20conferma%20anche%20per%20quest,l'attivit%C3%A0%20proprio%20nel%202020
Makarov V, Skvortsova I, Torkelli M (2019) Coworking as new element of supporting infrastructure for the Russian innovative businesses. Sci Tech J SPBGU Econ Sci 12(6):117–127
Manzini Ceinar I, Mariotti I (2021) The effects of covid-19 on coworking spaces: patterns and future trends. In: Mariotti I, Di Vita S, Akhavan M (eds) New workplaces—location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Research for development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_15
Mariotti I, Pacchi C, Di Vita S (2017) Coworking spaces in Milan: location patterns and urban effects. J Urban Technol 24:47–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
Micek G et al (eds) (2020) Deliverable 1.1. Definition of the phenomenon and the working spaces typologies, p 34
Oculus News (2018, Feb) Albania ranked first in the World for the number of bars and restaurants per inhabitant. Retrieved from Oculus News: https://www.ocnal.com/2018/02/albania-ranked-first-in-world-for.html
Oslo Business Region (2017) Oslo: state of the city. http://www.osloregionen.no/wpcontent/uploads/OsloStateOfTheCity_2017.pdf
Poltavskaya M (2014) Institutionalisation if the new forms of social interaction: coworking space. Bull Vologograde State Univ 3(23):107–115
Revinova S, Ratner S, Lazanyuk I, Gomonov K (2020) Sharing economy in Russia: current status, barriers, prospects and role of universities. Sustainability 12
Sinitsyna A, Di Marino M, Paas T (2022) Virtual coworking and remote working: corona lessons and perspectives from Estonia and Norway. In: Mariotti I, Di Marino M, Bednar P (eds) The COVID-19 pandemic and future of working spaces. Routledge, forthcoming
Trushkova S, Kvekveskiri E (2020) Development of co-working centers in Russia. Am Sci J 33:26–29
Utehin A, Denisova E (2020) Coworkings after the pandemic: more thermometers, less events. Vedomosti, 23 June
Van Oort F, Weterings A, Verlinde H (2003) Residential amenities of knowledge workers and the location of ICT-FIrms in The Netherlands. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 94(4):516–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00278
Zhou Y (2019) Coworking as an emerging urban lifestyle: location analysis study of coworking spaces in Manhattan, NYC. In: Beth A, Wener R, Yoon B, Rae RA, Morris J (eds) Proceedings from EDRA 50: sustainable urban environments. Environmental Design Research Association, Brooklyn, NY. Retrieved from: https://cuny.manifoldapp.org/projects/edra-50-proceedings
Acknowledgements
The book chapter is partially based upon research for COST Action CA18214 “The geography of New Working Spaces and the impact on the periphery,” a research network funded by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) and the EU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yunitsyna, A., Di Marino, M., Tagliaro, C., Smejkal, K., Shtepani, E. (2024). Prototyping a Peripheral Coworking Space in the Post-Covid Era: Proposal for an Architectural Competition. In: Manahasa, E., Naselli, F., Yunitsyna, A. (eds) COVID-19 (Forced) Innovations. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56607-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56607-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56606-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56607-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)