Skip to main content

Three Critical Elements of Start-Up Success

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Compared to the already complex and difficult pathway to market for innovative start-ups, innovators in forensic sciences face additional challenges when developing a technology or a service for the market. This chapter presents a(n) (self-)assessment method for founders and investors to estimate and monitor the success potential of a start-up based on three critical elements: time, team, and traction. Time refers to the temporal factors that influence a start-up’s performance and profitability. Team relates to the people who work on the start-up and their characteristics. Traction refers to the evidence of customer demand for the start-up’s product or service. The chapter also features the context for innovation through presenting the evolution of the “helix” models (triple, quadruple, quintuple), and the most popular tools to measure readiness level at increasing complexity, from the well known Technology Readiness Level to the KTH Innovation Readiness LevelTM. Finally, itt also provides examples from the forensic market and suggests some practical tips to balance and optimize these elements, aiming to help forensic science practitioners and researchers to bring their innovations to the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is a general term that describes the consolidation of companies or assets through various types of financial transactions. These transactions include mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, tender offers, purchase of assets, and management acquisitions.

  2. 2.

    A special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) is formed to raise money through an initial public offering (IPO) to buy another company.

  3. 3.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/management.

  4. 4.

    https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2015/10/what-is-branding-definition/.

  5. 5.

    Loc. cit. 4.

  6. 6.

    https://www.holozcan.com/.

References

  1. Andersson, E., Haase, D., Anderson, P., Cortinovis, C., Goodness, J., Kendal, D., Lausch, A., McPhearson, T., Sikorska, D., & Wellmann, T. (2021). What are the traits of a social-ecological system: towards a framework in support of urban sustainability. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-020-00008-4

  2. Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 852–879.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baskin, K. (2016. 10 3). How to scale a startup. MIT Management: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-to-scale-a-startup

  4. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and application. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bass, B. M., & Stogdil, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blank, T. H. (2023). Do founding team motivation types matter for student startups’ survival? Self-oriented, other-oriented, and diverse motivations in academic incubators. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10004-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolzani, D., Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., & Toschi, L. (2021). Technology transfer offices as providers of science and technology entrepreneurship education. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 335–365.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brescia, F., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2016). Organizational structures of Knowledge Transfer Offices: an analysis of the world's top-ranked universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burns, S. (2020. 11 18). How to build a startup team that’s equipped to scale. Forbes.com: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephanieburns/2020/11/18/how-to-build-a-startup-team-thats-equipped-to-scale/

  11. Carayannis, E., Barth, T., & Campbell, D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2

  12. Cassidy, N. G. (2018). The effect of scarcity types on consumer preference in the high-end sneaker market. Appalachian State University.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dvir, N., & Gafni, R. (2018). When less is more: empirical study of the relation between consumer behavior and information provision on commercial landing pages. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 019–039.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydersdorf, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans, J. D., & Johnson, R. O. (2013). Tools for Managing early-stage business model innovation. Research-Technology Management, 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gans, J., Scott, E. L., & Stern, S. (2018). Strategy for start-ups. Harward Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser, M., Krause, G., Ratter, B., & Welp, M. (2008). Human-nature-interaction in the anthropocene. Potential of social-ecological systems analysis. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hillenbrand, P. (2020. 4 13). What start-ups need to scale and succeed-interview with James Bilefield. McKinsey Digital: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/what-start-ups-need-to-scale-and-succeed

  19. Hilpert, M., & Giese, M. (2021. 5 4). The top 10 mistakes in B2B sales. Techstars: https://www.techstars.com/the-line/advice/the-top-10-mistakes-in-b2b-startup-sales

  20. Holden, N. M. (2022). A readiness level framework for sustainable circular bioeconomy. EFB Bioeconomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeco.2022.100031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Houterman, J., Blok, V., & Omta, O. (2014). Venture capital financing of techno-entrepreneurial start-ups: drivers and barriers for investments in research-based spin-offs in the Dutch medical life sciences industry. In F. Therin (Ed), Handbook of research on techno-entrepreneurship: how technology and entrepreneurship are shaping the development of industries and companies (old.: 169). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, J. (2020. 12 15). Gaining customer traction: 5 steps to customer growth. US Chamber of Commerce: https://www.uschamber.com/co/grow/customers/customer-traction-guide

  23. Kenton, W. (2023. 1 18). Burn rate: What it is, 2 types, formula, and examples. Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/burnrate.asp

  24. KTH. (2021). kthinnovationreadinesslevel.com/. Forrás: kthinnovationreadinesslevel.com/: https://kthinnovationreadinesslevel.com/

  25. Leydersdorf, L. (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 367–417.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luger, M. I., & Goldstein, H. A. (1991). Technology in the garden: Research parks and regional economic development. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marion. (2023. 05 24). What is branding? The Branding Journal: https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2015/10/what-is-branding-definition/

  28. McCarthy, I. P., Silvestre, B. S., von Nordenflycht, A., & Breznitz, S. M. (2018). A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McGill, J. (2021. 12 1). The power of internal relationships in the workplace. LeadFuze: https://www.leadfuze.com/internal-relationship/

  30. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation & NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Osterwalder, A. (2020). The strategizer box set. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. Portfolio Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 692–791.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schwab, C. (2023. 2 23). How to invest in a bear market. schwab.com: https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/how-to-invest-bear-market

  35. Seth, S. (2022. 10 16). Business Basics Guide. Forrás: Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/090815/basics-business-development.asp

  36. Smith, S. W. (2017. 10 26). Innovation readiness level. The Entrepreneur's Advisor(TM): https://blog.theentrepreneursadvisor.com/2017/10/innovation-readiness-level/

  37. Stan, A. (2022. 9 7). Start branding your business as early as possible. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2022/09/07/start-branding-your-business-as-early-as-possible/

  38. Straits Research. (2021). Forensic technology market size, share and forecast to 2030. Straits Research.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wapshott, N. (2012). Keynes Hayek: The Clash that defined modern economics. WW Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  40. World Intellectual Property Organization. (dátum nélk.). Patents. wipo.int: https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/

  41. Zaech, S., & Baldegger, U. (2017). Leadership in start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616676883

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoltán Székely .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annex 1

Patent

A patent is an exclusive right granted for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem. To get a patent, technical information about the invention must be disclosed to the public in a patent application.

One example of a forensic patent is a method for improved forensic analysis using multi-view digital imaging of forensic specimens at a plurality of reflected, scattered, emitted, transmitted or absorbed wavelengths. This device, invented by Patrick J. Treado, David L. Exline and Julianne Wolfe, assigned to ChemImage Corp and filed under patent number US20090092281A1 in 2003, provides new detailed information to distinguish and differentiate forensic materials and samples. The patent was used for 10 years and was abandoned in 2013.

Copyright

Copyright is a legal term used to describe the rights that creators have over their literary and artistic works. Works covered by copyright range from books, music, paintings, sculpture and films, to computer programs, databases, advertisements, maps and technical drawings.

For example, the already mentioned EnCase software is now a copyright of OpenText Corporation, the company which has acquired Guidance Software (the developer of EnCase) in 2017.

Trademark

A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks date back to ancient times when artisans used to put their signature or “mark” on their products.

For example, Foster & Freeman Limited has the word “foster + freeman” as their registered trademark (Trademark number 006396791) since 21/11/2008, last renewed on 03/05/2017, next expiry date on 26/10/2027. This trademark is valid for Nice classifications 9, 11, 35, 37, 38, 42, 45, which corresponds to the following fields:

  • 9—Apparatus and instruments for use in forensic examination; software and electronic databases for use in forensic examination, the collection of evidence, processing of evidence and police casework management; computer software, hardware and equipment for use in relation to forensic science, computer hardware and software for use in relation to digital imaging and document verification; display screens, cameras, lenses; microprocessors, microscopes, video camera and microscope interfacing equipment and systems; monitors, screens.

  • 11—Humidifiers for use in scientific instruments, forensic light sources, alternate light sources, filters for use with torches, lights and lighting apparatus.

  • 35—Retail services in relation to apparatus and instruments, software, computers, databases, all for use in forensic examination.

  • 37—Maintenance and repair services in respect of instruments for forensic examination; hardware maintenance.

  • 38—Providing access to databases.

  • 42—Technical consultancy services in relation to apparatus, instruments, and software all designed for use in forensic examination; analysis and comparison of documents, document verification, glass refractive index measurement; software and hardware technical support and software maintenance.

  • 45—Forensic services; investigative services; crime scene investigations; collection, processing and management of evidence.

This means that no other individual or organisation may brand its products or services commercialised in the fields above with the same label (foster + freeman) without infringing the trademark.

Industrial Design

An industrial design constitutes the ornamental or aesthetic aspect of an article. A design may consist of three-dimensional features, such as the shape or surface of an article, or of two-dimensional features, such as patterns, lines or colour.

An example of a protected design is a Tech-Long Dual Band Forensic Laser System design filed by Tech-Long Industry Limited under number 002839415-0001 on 28/10/2015 and expired on 28/10/2020. The registration consisted of a set of photos of the system, arrangement of sensors, handles and control panel. Design protection was valid for class/subclass 16.06 (Optical articles), which means that, between 2015 and 2020, a design and commercialisation of a product with similar look in that particular class would have been an infringement of the protected design.

Geographical Indication

Geographical indications and appellations of origin are signs used on goods that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities, a reputation or characteristics that are essentially attributable to that place of origin. Most commonly, a geographical indication includes the name of the place of origin of the goods.

To date, there is no evidence on the use of this type of protection for forensic tools; geographical indication is typically used for food, beverages or luxury items such as “Tokaj wine” or “Kalocsai paprika”.

Trade Secrets

Trade secrets are IP rights on confidential information which may be sold or licensed. The unauthorized acquisition, use or disclosure of such secret information in a manner contrary to honest commercial practices by others is regarded as an unfair practice and a violation of the trade secret protection.

This kind of protection is focusing on concealment of relevant knowledge rather than filing an official claim on it. As such, it is in contrast with requirements regularly set in public grants, for example awarded byHorizon Europe or other Open Science practices. In early stages of product development, especially while several technical or design solutions are not yet fully developed, nor clear, and therefore cannot be patented or submitted as industrial design, start-ups must rely on it. Having discussion with investors, submitting proposals for grant or negotiations with subcontractors puts this protection at risk, which is usually mitigated by non-disclosure agreements and—in certain countries—by legislation on protection of trade secrets.

Source for definitions in the annex:

World Intellectual Property Organization. Patents. wipo.int. [Online] https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/.

Annex 2

Detailed List of Readiness Measurements and Their Stages

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)

The nine levels of TRL are:

  1. 1.

    Basic principles observed and reported: At this stage, scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development.

  2. 2.

    Technology concept and/or application formulated: At this stage, the practical applications of the technology are identified and the concept is formulated.

  3. 3.

    Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept: At this stage, active research and development is initiated to establish proof of concept.

  4. 4.

    Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment: At this stage, basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together.

  5. 5.

    Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment: At this stage, the basic technological components are tested in a simulated or somewhat realistic environment.

  6. 6.

    System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment: At this stage, a representative model or prototype system is tested in a relevant environment.

  7. 7.

    System prototype demonstration in an operational environment: At this stage, a prototype system is demonstrated in an operational environment.

  8. 8.

    Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration: At this stage, the technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions.

  9. 9.

    Actual system proven through successful mission operations: At this final stage, the technology has been successfully applied in its final form and under mission conditions.

Software Development Stages

  1. 1.

    Pre-alpha refers to all activities performed during the software project before formal testing. These activities can include requirements analysis, software design, software development, and unit testing.

  2. 2.

    Alpha is the first phase of formal testing, during which the software is tested internally using white-box techniques. Alpha software may contain serious errors and may not contain all of the features that are planned for the final version.

  3. 3.

    Beta is the next phase, in which the software is tested by a larger group of users, typically outside of the organization that developed it. The beta phase is focused on reducing impacts on users and may include usability testing. This can be further divided into two sub-stages:

    1. a.

      closed beta with a recruited team of users and

    2. b.

      open beta with public access to the beta version (in case this stage is prolonged it is called perpetual beta)—usually this is the MVP stage for a software

  4. 4.

    Release Candidate (aka gamma or delta) is a phase in which the software is refined and tested further before the final version is released. This stage can be further divided into a Release Candidate and a Stable Release stage, where the latter means that the software passed all stages of verification and tests.

  5. 5.

    End-of-Life is the phase when the software is no longer sold or supported (updated), there are no new features, fixes or security updates, but it is still functional ‘as-is’. However in some cases the developer releases the source code or abandons its IPR allowing reverse engineering of the software which then can be maintained further by volunteers (typical example are old MS-DOS games).

Please note that there are different adaptations of the model, number of stages can reach from four to seven.

Business Readiness Levels (BRL)

  1. 1.

    Initial concept: At this stage, the idea for the business is still in its early stages and may not be fully formed.

  2. 2.

    Problem–Solution Fit: At this stage, the focus is on identifying a problem that the business can solve and developing a solution that fits the needs of potential customers.

  3. 3.

    Build team and plan: At this stage, the focus is on building a team to execute the business plan and developing a detailed plan for bringing the business to market.

  4. 4.

    Customer definition: At this stage, the focus is on defining the target customer for the business and understanding their needs and desires.

  5. 5.

    Hypothesis Testing: At this stage, the focus is on testing key assumptions about the business and its potential customers to validate the business model.

  6. 6.

    Minimum Viable Product: At this stage, the focus is on developing a minimum viable product (MVP) that can be used to test the market and gather feedback from potential customers.

  7. 7.

    Feedback loop: At this stage, the focus is on gathering feedback from customers and using it to improve the product and business model.

  8. 8.

    Scale: At this stage, the focus is on scaling the business to reach a larger market and achieve growth.

  9. 9.

    Fully embedded in market: At this final stage, the business is fully established in the market and has achieved a stable position.

Social Readiness Levels (SRL)

  1. 1.

    Identifying problem and identifying societal readiness.

  2. 2.

    Formulation of problem, proposed solution(s) and potential impact, expected societal readiness; identifying relevant stakeholders for the project.

  3. 3.

    Initial testing of proposed solution(s) together with relevant stakeholders.

  4. 4.

    Problem validated through pilot testing in relevant environment to substantiate proposed impact and societal readiness.

  5. 5.

    Proposed solution(s) validated, now by relevant stakeholders in the area.

  6. 6.

    Solution(s) demonstrated in relevant environment and in co-operation with relevant stakeholders to gain initial feedback on potential impact.

  7. 7.

    Refinement of project and/or solution and, if needed, retesting in relevant environment with relevant stakeholders.

  8. 8.

    Proposed solution(s) as well as a plan for societal adaptation complete and qualified

  9. 9.

    Actual project solution(s) proven in relevant environment.

The Innovation Readiness Levels (IRL)

  1. 1.

    A new idea.

  2. 2.

    The business concept.

  3. 3.

    Idea/business proposal.

  4. 4.

    Create an actionable plan.

  5. 5.

    Scaled testing.

  6. 6.

    Design and testing of support systems.

  7. 7.

    Full testing of systems and products.

  8. 8.

    Ready for full scale operation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Székely, Z. (2024). Three Critical Elements of Start-Up Success. In: Francese, S., S. P. King, R. (eds) Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56556-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56556-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56555-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56556-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics