Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation Through the Liaison with Academia and End Users

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century

  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the importance of establishing dialogue between academia (one of the innovation stakeholders) and the end-users (the beneficiaries of the research), and how governmental bodies have instigated and fostered these linkages. An overview is given of the main UK government organisations that have driven research in forensic science from the 1980s to the present day, together with government reviews of the forensic landscape impacting upon research and development. The interactions between government, academia and end-users to drive innovations in the fields the fields of fingerprints, DNA and digital forensics are described, and it is concluded that there are significant differences in the way the collective research community in each field has approached development and implementation of novel technology. Examples are reported where such three-way collaborations between academia, end-user and government have produced highly effective end products, but there is also scope for improving effectiveness of dialogue between these parties, particularly in the rapidly evolving digital forensics discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gilmour. (2023). Enhancing research collaboration within a large university department. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/.14703297.2023.2209064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walport, M., Craig, C., & Surkovic, E. (2015). Forensic science and beyond: Authenticity, provenance and assurance. In: Annual report of the government chief scientific adviser, Government Office for Science. [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506461/gs-15-37a-forensic-science-beyond-report.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  3. Madea, B., & Saukko, P. (2007). Future in forensic medicine as an academic discipline—Focussing on research. Forensic Science International, 165(2–3), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.030

  4. Carew, R., French, R., & Morgan, R. M. (2020). 3D forensic science: A new field integrating 3D imaging and 3D printing in crime reconstruction. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3(4), 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100205

  5. Mason, L. (2022). The modern malaise of innovation: Overwhelm, complexity, and herding cats. https://thelivinglib.org/the-modern-malaise-of-innovation-overwhelm-complexity-and-herding-cats/. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  6. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2006). Seventh report of session 2005–6. House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmsctech/900/90002.htm. Accessed September 4, 2023.

  7. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2011). The forensic science service. Seventh Report of Session 2010–12. House of Commons, London. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/855/855.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  8. Mennell, J. (2010). Fostering forensic innovation. Measurement and Control, 43(8), 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/002029401004300805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pratt, A. (2008). Protecting the public using science and technology: A UK Perspective, presentation. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2008/oct/uk-ho-tech-presentation.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  10. Silverman, B. (2011). Research and development in forensic science: A review. Home Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/118916/forensic-science-review-report.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  11. Forensic Science Special Interest Group. (2013). Taking Forensic Science R&D to Market. ESP KTN, Horsham.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forensic Science Special Interest Group (FoSciSIG). (2016). FRS0024, written evidence to parliament. In: FST0024—Evidence on forensic science strategy (parliament.uk). Accessed July 28, 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forensic Science Special Interest Group (FoSciSIG). (2018). FRS0040, written evidence to Parliament. In: FRS0040—Evidence on forensic science (parliament.uk). Accessed July 28, 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Home Office. (2016). Forensic science strategy: A national approach to forensic science delivery in the criminal justice system. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506652/54493_Cm_9217_Forensic_Science_Strategy_Accessible.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  15. BBC. (2016). Forensic science strategy vague and incoherent, MPs say. September 17, 2016. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37390923. Accessed September 23, 2023.

  16. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee Report. (2019). Forensic science and the criminal justice system: A blueprint for change. 1 May 2019, HL paper 333 of session 2017–19. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldsctech/333/333.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  17. NPCC Science and Technology Strategy. (2022). [https://science.police.uk/site/assets/files/1253/npcc_science_and_technology_strategy-1.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2023.

  18. Faulds, H. (1905). Guide to fingerprint identification. Hanley.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ramatowski, R., Cantu, A. A., Joullie, M. M., & Petrovskaia, O. (1997). 1,2-Indanediones: a preliminary evaluation of a new class of amino acid visualising reagents. Fingerprint Whorld, 23(90), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prete, C., Galmiche, L., Quenum-Possy-Berry, F.-G., Allain, C., Thiburce, N., & Colard, T. (2013). Lumicyano™: A new fluorescent cyanoacrylate for a one-step luminescent latent fingermark development. Forensic Science International, 233(1–3), 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foster, D. J., & Morantz, D. J. (1979). An Electrostatic Imaging Technique for the Detection of Indented Impressions in Documents. Forensic Science International, 13, 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haines, S. A. (1982). Canadian Police News Magazine, pp 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wood, L. W. (1991). The discovery of super glue fuming. Fingerprint Whorld, 16(64), 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hambley, D. S. (1972). The physics of vacuum evaporation development of latent fingerprints, PhD Thesis. The Royal Holloway College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dalrymple, B. E., Duff, J. M., & Menzel, E. R. (1977). Inherent fingerprint luminescence—Detection by laser. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 22(1), 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Theys, P., Lepareux, A., Chevet, G., & Ceccaldi, P. F. (1968). New technique for bringing out latent fingerprints on paper: Vacuum metallisation. International Criminal Police Review, 217, 106–108.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kent, T., Thomas, G. L., Reynoldson, T. E., & East, H. W. (1976). A vacuum coating technique for the development of latent fingerprints on polythene. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 16(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams, G., McMurray, H. N., & Worsley, D. A. (2001). Latent fingerprint detection using a scanning kelvin microprobe. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(5), 1085–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Archer, N. E., Charles, Y., Elliott, J. A., & Jickells, S. (2005). Changes in the lipid composition of latent fingerprint residue with time after deposition on a surface. Forensic Science International, 154, 224–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ricci, C., Phiriyavityopas, P., Curum, N., Chan, K. L. A., Jickells, S., & Kazarian, S. G. (2007). Chemical imaging of latent fingerprint residues. Applied Spectroscopy, 61, 514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolstenholme, R., Bradshaw, R., Clench, M. R., & Francese, S. (2009). Study of latent fingermarks by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 23(19), 3031–3039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bandey, H. (ed.) (2014). Fingermark visualisation manual (1st ed.). Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sears, V. G., Bleay, S. M., Bandey, H. L., & Bowman, V. J. (2012). A methodology for finger mark research. Science & Justice, 52(3), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. IFRG. (2014). Guidelines for the assessment of fingermark detection techniques. Journal of Forensic Identification, 64(2), 174–200.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gill, P., Jeffreys, A., & Werrett, D. (1985). Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints.’ Nature, 318, 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1038/318577a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeffreys, A., Wilson, V., & Thein, S. (1985). Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature, 316, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/316076a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jeffreys, A., Brookfield, J., & Semeonoff, R. (1985). Positive identification of an immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprints. Nature, 317, 818–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/317818a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aronson, J. D. (2005). DNA fingerprinting on trial: The dramatic early history of a new forensic technique. Endeavour, 29(3), 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Amankwaa, A. O., & McCartney, C. (2019). The effectiveness of the UK national DNA database. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Gaughran v. the United Kingdom—45245/15. Judgment 13.2.2020.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lapointe, M., Rogic, A., Bourgoin, S., Jolicoeur, C., & Séguin, D. (2015). Leading-edge forensic DNA analyses and the necessity of including crime scene investigators, police officers and technicians in a DNA elimination database. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 19, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pickrahn, I., Kreindl, G., Müller, E., Dunkelmann, B., Zahrer, W., Cemper-Kiesslich, J., & Neuhuber, F. (2017). Contamination incidents in the pre-analytical phase of forensic DNA analysis in Austria—Statistics of 17 years. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 31, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McCartney, C. (2006). The DNA expansion programme and criminal investigation. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sewell, J., Quinones, I., Ames, C., Multaney, B., Curtis, S., Seeboruth, H., Moore, S., & Daniel, B. (2008). Recovery of DNA and fingerprints from touched documents. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2(4), 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Quinones, I., & Daniel, B. (2012). Cell free DNA as a component of forensic evidence recovered from touched surfaces. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6(1), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Muir, R., & Walcott, S. (2021). Unleashing the value of digital forensics. The Police Foundation. https://www.police-foundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/value_of_digital_forensics.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  47. HMIFRS. (2022). An inspection into how well the police and other agencies use digital forensics in their investigations. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publication-html/how-well-the-police-and-other-agencies-use-digital-forensics-in-their-investigations/. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  48. Tully, G. (2017). Forensic science regulator: Annual report. November 2015–2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/581653/FSR_Annual_Report_v1.0.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  49. Tully, G. (2018). Forensic science regulator: Annual report. November 2016–2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/674761/FSRAnnual_Report_2017_v1_01.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  50. Tully, G. (2019). Forensic science regulator: Annual report. November 2017–2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/918342/FSRAnnual_Report_2018.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  51. APCC/NPCC. (2016). Policing Vision 2025. [https://npcc.police.uk/documents/policing%20vision.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2023.

  52. Transforming Forensics/FCN/NPCC/APCC, Digital Forensic Science Strategy. (2020). https://www.npcc.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/publications/publications-log/2020/national-digital-forensic-science-strategy.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

  53. NPCC/APCC National Policing Digital Strategy. (2020). https://pds.police.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/National-Policing-Digital-Strategy-2020-2030.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of the Chief Scientific Adviser, National Police Chief’s Council, London, UK

    Carolyn Lovell

  2. School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK

    Stephen Bleay

Authors
  1. Carolyn Lovell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Bleay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Lovell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Biomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK

    Simona Francese

  2. Research and Innovation, foster+freeman, Evesham, UK

    Roberto S. P. King

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lovell, C., Bleay, S. (2024). Innovation Through the Liaison with Academia and End Users. In: Francese, S., S. P. King, R. (eds) Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56556-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56556-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56555-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56556-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation