Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Energy ((BRIEFSENERGY))

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

It is important to discover the connections undergoing between data in order to asses complete and robust mathematical relations (Quinn et al. in Bioinformatics 34(16):2870–2878, 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Quinn TP, Erb I, Richardson MF, Crowley TM (2018) Understanding sequencing data as compositions: an outlook and review. Bioinformatics 34(16):2870–2878. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ross SM (2021) Chapter 6: distributions of sampling statistics. In: Ross SM (ed) Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (6th edn). Academic Press, New York, 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824346-6.00015-6.

  3. Yvonnet J, Monteiro E, He Q-C (2013) Computational homogenization method and reduced database model for hyperelastic heterogeneous structures. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 11:3. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2013005374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiernan D (2023) Chapter 7: correlation and simple linear regression. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/natural-resources-biometrics/chapter/chapter-7-correlation-and-simple-linear-regression/

  5. Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, Cohen I (2009) Pearson correlation coefficient. In: Noise reduction in speech processing, in Springer topics in signal processing, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5

  6. Farebrother RW (2017) Linear least squares computations. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203748923

  7. Agawin NSR, Duarte CM, Agustí S (2000) Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production. Limnol Oceanogr 45(3):591–600. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tokuşoglu O, Unal MK (2003) Biomass nutrient profiles of three microalgae: spirulina platensis, chlorella vulgaris, and isochrisis galbana. J Food Sci 68(4):1144–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb09615.x

  9. Michalik M, Wilczyńska-Michalik W (2012) Mineral and chemical composition of biomass ash. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4298.5603

  10. Gil A, Toledo M, Siles JA, Martín MA (2018) Multivariate analysis and biodegradability test to evaluate different organic wastes for biological treatments: anaerobic co-digestion and co-composting. Waste Manag 78:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers L, Sirois MJ (2006) Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In: Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess5050.pub2

  12. de Winter JCF, Gosling SD, Potter J (2016) Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychol Methods 21(3):273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Atkinson CF, Jones DD, Gauthier JJ (1996) Biodegradability and microbial activities during composting of poultry litter. Poult Sci 75(5):608–617. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmadi-Pirlou M, Ebrahimi-Nik M, Khojastehpour M, Ebrahimi SH (2017) Mesophilic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge: effect of mixing ratio, total solids, and alkaline pretreatment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 125:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, Lee J, Tong YW (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Batstone DJ et al (2002) The IWA anaerobic digestion model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol 45(10):65–73. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Smith SR (2022) The link between organic matter composition and the biogas yield of full-scale sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 85(5):1658–1672. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siddique MNI, Wahid ZA (2018) Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. J Clean Prod 194(1):359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X (2012) Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 120:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Benner R, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE (1984) Anaerobic biodegradation of the lignin and polysaccharide components of lignocellulose and synthetic lignin by sediment microflora. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(5):998–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang M, Li W, Li P, Yan S, Zhang Y (2017) An alternative parameter to characterize biogas materials: available carbon-nitrogen ratio. Waste Manag 62:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner BL (2010) Variation in pH optima of hydrolytic enzyme activities in tropical rain forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(19):6485–6493. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00560-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutton A et al (2006) Manipulation of animal diets to affect manure production, composition and odors: state of the science. In: Animal agriculture and the environment, national center for manure and animal waste management white papers. ASABE, St. Joseph. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20259

  24. Tang J, Wang XC, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Li Y (2017) Effect of pH on lactic acid production from acidogenic fermentation of food waste with different types of inocula. Bioresour Technol 224:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheah Y-K, Vidal-Antich C, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2019) Volatile fatty acid production from mesophilic acidogenic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under acidic and alkaline pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(35):35509–35522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05394-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Jin Y, Borrion A, Li H, Li J (2017) Effects of organic composition on the anaerobic biodegradability of food waste. Bioresour Technol 243:836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanum F et al (2023) Treatment of sewage sludge using anaerobic digestion in Malaysia: current state and challenges. Front Energy Res 7:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Labatut RA, Pronto JL (2018) Chapter 4—sustainable waste-to-energy technologies: anaerobic digestion. In: Trabold TA, Babbitt CW (eds) Sustainable food waste-to-energy systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811157-4.00004-8

  29. Li D et al (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresour Technol 189:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jabeen M, Zeshan S, Yousaf S, Haider MR, Malik RN (2015) High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 102:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dewil R, Baeyens J, Roels J, Steene BVD (2008) Distribution of Sulphur Compounds in Sewage Sludge Treatment. Environ Eng Sci 25(6):879–886. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Federico Moretta & Giulia Bozzano

Authors
  1. Federico Moretta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giulia Bozzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Moretta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moretta, F., Bozzano, G. (2024). Statistical Analysis. In: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization. SpringerBriefs in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56460-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56460-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56459-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56460-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation