Abstract
This section is on methodology of ethical reasoning, providing a detailed definition of the methods employed in psychiatry ethics. The prevailing approach in clinical ethics is the principle-based approach, whereby nearly every ethical problem is approached through this methodology. The principle-based approach is undeniably useful, practical, and widely accepted, particularly in the context of research ethics involving human subjects. However, relying only on the principle-based approach falls short in addressing the complexities and dilemmas arising within the realm of clinical ethics. This limited approach frequently undermines the consideration of inherent moral values of the physician-patient relationship, such as trust, fidelity, veracity, trustworthiness, confidentiality, and privacy, thus steering toward mechanical solutions that are incongruent with the art of medicine. Therefore, it is important to incorporate other ethical analysis methodologies while adressing the complex and interwoven multifaceted ethical issues and dilemmas in clinical ethics. This chapter on methodology explains normative ethical theories and contemporary approaches that have been found to be functional and successful in psychiatric ethics and have rapidly gained prominence such as the hermeneutic approach. In this chapter, these traditional and contemporary methodologies are introduced together with their philosophical frameworks, providing the reader with a comprehensive perspective on how these methods can be applied to solving ethical issues in the clinical settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
İep.utm.edu/divine-command-theory
References
Roth MD, Levin LJ. Dilemma of Tarasoff: must physicians protect the public or their patients? Law Med Health Care. 1983;11(3):104–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.1983.tb01720.x.
Houser R, Wilczenski FL, Ham MA. Culturally relevant ethical decision-making in counseling. London: Sage Publishing; 2006.
Munson R. Intervention and reflection: basic issues in medical ethics. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co; 1992.
McIntyre A. Doctrine of double effect. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/double-effect/, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/.
Cf. Aquinas T. Summa Theologiae, Ia q. 65, a. 2, Latin text, English translation. Wallace WA. Introduction, notes, appendices, and glossary, vol. X. London: Blackfriars; 1967. p. 11–12.
Gaffney J. Over-extended principle of totality and underlying issues. J Relig Ethics. 1976;4(2):259–67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014904.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Gardiner P. A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:297–302.
Ekmekci PE, Folayan MO. A theoretical framework for ethical decision-making during public health emergencies. Acta Bioethica. 2022;28(1):105–16. https://actabioethica.uchile.cl/index.php/AB/article/view/67303.
George T. Hermeneutics. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/hermeneutics/.
Ten Have H. The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics. Theor Med. 1994;15(2):113–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994020. PMID: 7997968.
Vergara O. Hermeneutics and decision-making in clinical ethics. Rev Bioét (Impr). 2017;25(2):255–63.
Follesdal D. Hermeneutics. Int J Pscycoanal. 2001;82:375–9.
Molewijk AC, Abma T, Stolper M, Widdershoven G. Teaching ethics in the clinic The theory and practiceof moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:120–4.
Molewijk B, Verkerk M, Milius H, Widdershoven G. Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Med Health Care Philos. 2008;11:43–56.
Hursthouse R, Pettigrove G. Virtue ethics. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition). 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ekmekci, P.E. (2024). Ethical Reasoning Methodology. In: Ekmekci, P.E. (eds) Ethical Dilemma in Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56211-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56211-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56210-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56211-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)