Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Quest for Impact Research: Position, Strategies and Future Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Business Education, Research and Practices

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

There is an urgent global call for sustainable development (SD) action to meet the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Business schools play a significant role in facilitating engagement and enabling action on the global commitment for impact. Such institutions strive for responsible and meaningful impact by fostering the sustainable development goal (SDG) commitments, where research is a core element of this impact lexicon. However, research commitments in business schools are challenged by the pressures of academic life and its progressions that scholars face, often hindering pathways towards impact research. As an interdisciplinary group of researchers embarking on a major research project focused on SD, this positional paper considers why impact research is important, what impact research is, and how we as researchers can ensure we best do impact research that is embedded in purposeful shared partnerships and collaborations. To continue the impact research dialogue and enable other researchers, we share strategic pathways and community considerations for conducting impact research that can be applied, measured, and put into action towards the SDGs and the 2030 Agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker S, Webber M (2016) Discipline and publish: The tenure review process in Ontario universities. In: Shultz L, Vickzo M (eds) Assembling and governing the higher education institution: democracy, social justice and leadership in global higher education. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 233-255

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler NJ, Harzing AW (2009) When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Acad Manag Learn Educ 8(1):72–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manag 38(4):932–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Ágoston C, Csaba B, Nagy B, Kőváry Z, Dúll A, Rácz J, Demetrovics Z (2022) Identifying types of eco-anxiety, eco-guilt, eco-grief, and eco-coping in a climate-sensitive population: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(4):2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alperin JP, Nieves CM, Schimanski LA, et al. (2019) How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? eLife 8:e42254. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.4225

  • Antonacopoulou EP (2010) Making the business school more ‘critical’: reflexive critique based on phronesis as a foundation for impact. Br J Manag 21:s6–s25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou EP (2022) Partnering for impact: a grand challenge and design for co creating a just, resilient and flourishing society. J Appl Behav Sci 58(4):571–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell J (2018) Deep adaptation: a map for navigating climate tragedy. In: Institute for Leadership and Sustainability (IFLAS) Occasional Papers, University of Cumbria, Ambleside, UK. 2:1–36. http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4166/ (accessed 15 November 2022)

  • Bennett N, Lemoine GJ (2014) What a difference a word makes: understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Bus Horiz 57(3):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth P (2013) University engagement with socially excluded communities. In: Benneworth P (ed) university engagement with socially excluded communities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0_1

  • Bentz J, O’Brien K, Scoville-Simonds M (2022) Beyond “blah blah blah”: exploring the “how” of transformation. Sustain Sci 17(2):497–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz VM, Shapiro JJ (1998) Mindful inquiry in social research. Sage Publications

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bieluch KH, Bell KP, Teisl MF et al. (2017) Transdisciplinary research partnerships in sustainability science: an examination of stakeholder participation. preferences. Sustain Sci 12(1):87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0360-x

  • Bohm D, Biederman C (1999) Bohm–Bierderman Correspondence: Volume one-Creative and science. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabells International (2022) Scholarly Analytics. https://www2.cabells.com (accessed 17 November 2022)

  • Cajete G (2000) Native science: natural laws of interdependence

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Klenk NL et al. (2022) Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. Glob Environ Change 72:102422

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Research Council (2022) Defining impact. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social sciences/defining-impact/ (accessed 10 November 2022)

  • Chandler D (2014) Resilience: the governance of complexity: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins K, Ison R (2009) Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 19(6):358–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Quincey C (2002) Radical nature: the soul of the matter. Park Street Press, Rochester, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (2020) Pluriversal politics: the real and the possible. Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Evensky J (2005) Adam Smith’s theory of moral sentiments: on morals and why they matter to a liberal society of free people and free markets. J Eco Persp 19(3):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Ríos L, Rodriguez-Diaz J (2014) The “impact factor style of thinking”: a new theoretical framework. Intern J Clin Health Psychol 14(2):154-160

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz L, Meinherz F (2020) Tracing power in transdisciplinary sustainability research: an exploration. GAIA-Ecol Persp Sci Soc 29(1):41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl VE (1972) The feeling of meaninglessness: a challenge to psychotherapy. Am J Psyc 32(1):85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (2000) Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris MS (2021) The soft underbelly of universities as anchor institutions: the disconnect between university and community research priorities. High Educ Policy 34(3):603–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D (2014) Educating for hope in troubled times: climate change and the transition to a post-carbon future. London: Institute of Education Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AJ (2021) Management as a calling: leading business, serving society. Stanford University Press, Redwood City, UNITED STATES

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AJ, Jennings PD (2018) Re-engaging with sustainability in the Anthropocene era: an institutional approach. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks B (2014) Teaching to transgress: education as a practice of freedom. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CJ, Thierry A, Rowlandson W et al. (2021) From publications to public actions: the role of universities in facilitating academic advocacy and activism in the climate and ecological emergency. Frontiers in Sustainability 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan R (1982) The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp L, Xu C, Depledge J et al. (2022) Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(34):e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119

  • Korten DC (2010) Agenda for a new economy: for phantom wealth to real wealth. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krivine H (2015) The earth: from myth to knowledge. Verso, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert E, Wilson EO and Lovejoy TE (2017) Living in the Anthropocene: Earth in the Age of Humans. Smithsonian Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune C, Starkey K, Kalika M, Tempest S (2019) The impact of business schools: increasing the range of strategic choices. Manag Int 23(2):88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor S, Phipps D (2020) How a networked approach to building capacity in knowledge mobilization supports research impact. Intern J Educ Policy Leade 16(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW (2015) Capitalism in the web of life: ecology and the accumulation of capital: Verso Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu F, Hatch J (2021) Becoming a teacher scholar: the perils and promise of meeting the promotion and tenure requirements in a business school. J Manag Educ 45(2):293–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovero (2022) Climate change: its impacts on microbial communities and mental health. eScholarship, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala M (2017) Hope and anticipation in education for a sustainable future. Futures 94:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Shea J (2012) Kant's critique of pure reason: an introduction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730097

  • Petriglieri G, Petriglieri JL (2015) Can business schools humanize leadership? Acad Manag Learn Educ 14(4):625–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew A, Starkey K (2016) From the guest editors: the legitimacy and impact of business schools—Key issues and a research agenda. Acad Manag Learn Educ 15(4):649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihkala P (2022) The process of eco-anxiety and ecological grief: a narrative review and a new proposal. Sustainability 14(24):16628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira L, Bennett E, Biggs R, Peterson G, McPhearson T, Norström A … Vervoort J (2018) Seeds of the future in the present: Exploring pathways for navigating towards “good” Anthropocenes

    Google Scholar 

  • Price-Smith AT (2001) The health of nations: infectious disease, environmental change, and their effects on national security and development. Mit Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts K, Brown L (2015) Becoming an anti-oppressive researcher. In: Strega S, Brown L (eds) Research as resistance: revisiting critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, pp 17-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich A (2002) Arts of the possible: essays and conversations. WW Norton and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Bryce R, Machen R (2018) Pathways to policy impact: a new approach for planning and evidencing research impact. Evid Policy 14(03):431–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Ferre M, Martin-Ortega J et al (2021) Evaluating impact from research: amethodological framework. Res Policy 50(4):104–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Rudman H (2022) Re-thinking research impact: voice, context and power at the interface of science, policy and practice. Sustainability Science, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Kotzé L, Milutinović S, Biermann F, Brovkin V, Donges J ... Kim R (2024) The planetary commons: A new paradigm for safeguarding earth-regulating systems in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 121(5):e2301531121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg K, Rowan M, Nixon A et al. (2022) The Misalignment of the FT50 with the achievement of the UN’s SDGs: a call for responsible research assessment by business schools. Sustainability 14(15)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux DJ, Nel JL, Cundill G, O’farrell P, Fabricius C (2017) Transdisciplinary research for systemic change: who to learn with, what to learn about and how to learn. Sustain Sci 12:711-726

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD, Schmidt-Traub G, Mazzucato M et al. (2019) Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain 2(9):805–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellberg MM, Cockburn J, Holden PB, Lam DPM (2021) Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self. Ecosyst People 17(1):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1931452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Smith B, Kruschwitz N et al. (2008) The necessary revolution: how individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world New York: Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheirich C (2020) Coping with the Climate crisis: exploring art therapy for sustainable mental health

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (2005) How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organiz Sci 16(2):180–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (2007) Living in mythical spaces. Organiz Stud 28(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W (2022) The earth system, the great acceleration and the anthropocene. Sustainability and the New Economics. Springer, Cham, pp 15–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, De Wit CA (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiller SJ, Rhindress AP, Oguntola IO, Ülkü MA, Williams KA, Sundararajan B (2022) Exploring the impact of climate change on arctic shipping through the lenses of quadruple bottom line and sustainable development goals. Sustainability 14(4):2193. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2193

  • Tong S, Bambrick H, Beggs PJ, Chen L, Hu Y, Ma W … Tan J (2022) Current and future threats to human health in the anthropocene. Environ Intern 158:106892

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021 (2021) COP26 World Leaders Summit – Statement on The Breakthrough Agenda. https://ukcop26.org/cop26-world-leaders-summit-statement-on-the-breakthrough-agenda/

  • United Nations (General Assembly) (2007). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.york.ac.uk/staff/research/research-impact/impact-definition/

  • University of York (n.d.) Research Impact: What is research impact

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis Y, Brooks A, vanden Heuvel K, Brooks D (2020) Is Capitalism Broken?: Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S (2020) A relational turn for sustainability science? relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People 16(1):304–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Whiteman G (2021) A call for deep engagement for impact: addressing the planetary emergency. Strateg Organ 19(3):526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Grant Number 1174082 to Kent Williams.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

    Kent A. Williams, Loretta Baidoo, Tony R. Walker, Binod Sundararajan & Alexander Davis

Authors
  1. Kent A. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loretta Baidoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tony R. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Binod Sundararajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kent A. Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

    Tony Wall

  2. HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Laís Viera Trevisan

  3. HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  4. Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

    Adam Shore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, K.A., Baidoo, L., Walker, T.R., Sundararajan, B., Davis, A. (2024). The Quest for Impact Research: Position, Strategies and Future Directions. In: Wall, T., Viera Trevisan, L., Leal Filho, W., Shore, A. (eds) Sustainability in Business Education, Research and Practices. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55996-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation