Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Romanian Parties and Post-Communist Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Communist Progress and Stagnation at 35

  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to map the features that make up the Romanian party politics three decades after the collapse of the communist regime. The analysis starts by identifying the main stages in the development of Romanian party politics, from the extreme fluidity of the early 1990s to the progressive closure of the party system starting in the 2000s. On the one side, this stabilization has been equated to a predictable competition for government offices and regular inter-party relations; on the other, the Romanian low number of parliamentary political parties was increasingly criticized for hampering the possibilities for a renewed supply of parties, reinforcing corruption and collusive practices, and, implicitly, generating a limited turnover in power. On this ground, different organizations and various political entrepreneurs have voiced the need to defend traditional values in politics; the 2020 Romanian general elections brought a relevant populist radical right populist party to Parliament. Beyond this electoral success, the AUR’s arrival to national politics has given more visibility to the illiberal traits of politics and shed light on the vulnerability of the Romanian post-communist democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barometrul Civic din Romania. 2023. “Geeks for Democracy.” https://media.hotnews.ro/media_server1/document-2023-07-20-26410509-0-geeks-for-democracy-cult-research-barometrulcivicromania-baroc-20iul2023.pdf, accessed on 22 August 2023.

  • BEC. 2020. https://parlamentare2020.bec.ro/, accessed on 22 August 2023.

  • Bielasiak, Jack. 2002. “The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States.” Comparative Politics 34 (2): 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, Sarah, Frances Millard, Marina Popescu, and Kieran Williams. 2002. Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, Jolan. 2017. Performative Contradiction and the Romanian Revolution. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolleyer, Nicole. 2013. New Parties in Old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in Seventeen Democracies. 1st ed. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borbáth, Endre. 2019. “Romania—Polity Contestation and the Resilience of Mainstream Parties.” In European Party Politics in Times of Crisis, edited by Hutter Swen and Kriesi Hanspeter, 214–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bucur, Cristina. 2012. “Romanian Politics in 2012 Has Been Marked by a Rocky Cohabitation Between Victor Ponta’s Government and President Traian Basescu.” European Politics and Policy at LSE, 26 December. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/49455, accessed on 30 August 2023.

  • Casal Bértoa, Fernando. 2013. “Post-Communist Politics: On the Divergence (and/or Convergence) of East and West.” Government and Opposition 48 (03): 398–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, Fernando. 2023. “Database on WHO GOVERNS in Europe and Beyond, PSGo.” https://whogoverns.eu/ accessed on 30 August 2023.

  • Casal Bértoa, Fernando, and Zsolt Enyedi. 2021. Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives, and Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaramonte, Alessandro, and Vincenzo Emanuele. 2017. “Party System Volatility, Regeneration and De-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015).” Party Politics 23 (4): 376–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiru, Mihail. 2021. “Does Electoral Reform Change MPs’ Behavior? Evidence from Romania.” Political Studies Review 19 (3): 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craciun, Claudiu. 2017. “Romania’s Second Democratic Transition.” Bucharest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/13080.pdf. accessed on 30 August 2023.

  • Dalton, Russell J. 2018. Political Realignment: Economics, Culture, and Electoral Change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dragolea, Alina. 2022. “Illiberal Discourse in Romania: A ‘Golden’ New Beginning?” Politics and Governance 10 (4): 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoman, Dragoș. 2021. “‘Save Romania’ Union and the Persistent Populism in Romania.” Problems of Post-Communism 68 (4): 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow. 2019. “Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.” Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov). http://www.parlgov.org/. accessed on 30 December 2018.

  • Elgie, Robert, and Sophie Moestrup. 2008. Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuele, Vincenzo, and Allan Sikk. 2021. “Party Crashers? Modeling Genuinely New Party Development Paths in Western Europe.” Party Politics 27 (5): 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuele, Vincenzo, Alessandro Chiaramonte, and Sorina Soare. 2020. “Does the Iron Curtain Still Exist? The Convergence in Electoral Volatility Between Eastern and Western Europe.” Government and Opposition 55 (2): 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom in the World. The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1996–1997. 1998. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_1996-1997_complete_book.pdf, accessed on 22 August 2023.

  • Gallagher, Tom. 2005. Theft of a Nation: Romania Since Communism. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, Timothy. 1993. The Magic Lantern: The Revolution of ’89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, Sergiu, and George Jiglau. 2012. “Where Does the Mechanism Collapse? Understanding the 2008 Romanian Electoral System.” Representation (McDougall Trust) 48 (4): 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, Sergiu, and Sergiu Miscoiu. 2013. “The Failure of Cohabitation: Explaining the 2007 and 2012 Institutional Crises in Romania.” East European Politics and Societies 27 (4): 668–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, Sergiu, and Sorina Soare. 2016. “A Test of European Union Post-Accession Influence: Comparing Reactions to Political Instability in Romania.” Democratization 23 (5): 797–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, Sergiu, and Sorina Soare. 2021. “Electoral Performance Beyond Leaders? The Organization of Populist Parties in Postcommunist Europe.” Party Politics 27 (1): 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, Sergiu, Joakim Ekman, and Olena Podolian. 2021. “Anti-establishment Parties and Voters’ Responses in Post-Communist Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 68 (4): 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giugal, Aurelian, Ron Johnston, Daniel Buti, and Alexandru Radu. 2020. “Reforming an Electoral System—An Experiment That Failed: Romania 2008–2012.” Representation (McDougall Trust) 56 (1): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymała-Busse, Anna Maria. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, Swen, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2019. European Party Politics in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iancu, Alexandra, and Sorina Soare. 2020. “Party Membership in Romania: Political Legitimacy, Party Finance and Organisational Changes.” Sociologický Časopis 56 (3): 315–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancu, Alexandra, and Angela Tacea. 2023. “Le semi-présidentialisme dans les régimes post-soviétiques: triomphe et régression démocratique.” Pouvoirs 184 (1): 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDEA. 2023. “IDEA Turnout Database.” https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout, accessed on 20 August 2023.

  • Ishiyama, John T. 1999. “Representational Mechanisms and Ethno-Politics: Evidence from Transitional Democracies in Eastern Europe.” East European Quarterly 33 (2): 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, Petr, and Maria Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominic Höglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 1998. “Democracy’s Time Constraints.” International Political Science Review 19 (1): 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, 1–73. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, and Edurne Zoco. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13 (2): 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mărgărit, Diana. 2020. “Insurgent Conservatism in Romania.” Bucharest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://storage.polit-x.de/media/STIFT_FES/pdf/2020-06/2a956856df1187c098e914392ea5b852.pdf. last access 30 August 2023.

  • Morlino, Leonardo. 1998. Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups, and Citizens in Southern Europe. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Robert G. 1999. “Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Postcommunist States.” World Politics 51 (3): 359–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2002. “Romania’s ‘End of Transition’ Deconstructed.” Romanian Journal of Political Science 2 (1): 186–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Passarelli, Gianluca. 2020. “The Presidential Party: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Analysis.” Political Studies Review 18 (1): 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen Mogens N. 1979. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Mogens N. 1982. “Towards a New Typology of Party Lifespans and Minor Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 5 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu, Dragos. 2010. Explaining the Romanian Revolution of 1989: Culture, Structure, and Contingency. Bucharest: Ed. Enciclopedică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner, Marc F. 2019. “Illiberal Democracy and the Struggle on the Right.” Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, Marina, and Mihail Chiru. 2020. “Electoral System Incentives for a Party-Serving Personal Vote: How Can High Personalization Occur Under PR?’ Communist and Post-Communist Studies 53 (2): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, Marina, and Sorina Soare. 2017. “For Things to Remain the Same, Things Will Have to Change: Party Regulation as a Form of Engineering Party Competition and Political Legitimacy in Romania.” In The Regulation of Post-Communist Party Politics, edited by Fernando Casal Bértoa and Ingrid van Biezen, 143–174. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preda, Cristian. 2005. Partide și alegeri în România postcomunistă: 1989–2004. Iasi: Nemira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preda, Cristian, and Sorina Soare. 2012. Democratizzazione in Romania: regime, partiti e sistema di partiti. Roma: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, Tapio, and Thomas Sedelius. 2020. “Presidents and Cabinets: Coordinating Executive Leadership in Premier-Presidential Regimes.” Political Studies Review 18 (1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Stephen D. 2000. Romania: The Unfinished Revolution. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandru, Daniel, Anneli Ute Gabanyi, Alexandru Muraru, and Andrei Muraru. 2020. Revolutia Din 1989 Invinsi Si Invingatori. Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 2004. Party Government... New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siani-Davies, Peter. 2005. The Romanian Revolution of December 1989. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soare, Sorina, and Claudiu D. Tufiș. 2023. “Saved by the Diaspora? The Case of the Alliance for the Union of Romanians.” European Political Science 22 (1): 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, Lavinia. 1995. “Romanian Privatization: Assessment of the First Five Years.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 28 (4): 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ștefan-Scalat, Laurențiu. 2004. Patterns of Political Elite Recruitment in Post-Communist Romania. Bucharest: Ziua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanasescu, Elena Simina. 2008. “The President of Romania: Or: The Slippery Slope of a Political System.” European Constitutional Law Review 4 (1): 64–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, Margit. 2009. Presidents with Prime Ministers: Do Direct Elections Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, Margit, and Natalia Letki. 2009. “When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe.” American Political Science Review 103 (04): 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufiş, Claudiu D. 2014. “The Not-So-Curious Case of Low Political Participation in Romania.” Calitatea Vieţii 25 (3): 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, Milada A., and Liesbet Hooghe. 2009. “Postcommunist Politics in a Magnetic Field: How Transition and EU Accession Structure Party Competition on European Integration.” Comparative European Politics 7 (2): 179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, Katherine, and Gail Kligman. 1992. “Romania After Ceauşescu: Post-Communist Communism?’ In Eastern Europe in Revolution, edited by Ivo Banac, 117–147. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • www.hotnews.ro. 2023. “Sondaj: PSD favorit în intențiile de vot, PNL și AUR, umăr la umăr / Încrederea în partide, la pământ, și o cotă semnificativă pentru extrema dreaptă.” 20 July. https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-politic-26410525-sondaj-psd-favorit-intentiile-vot-pnl-aur-umar-umar-increderea-partide-pamant-cota-semnificativa-pentru-extrema-dreapta.htm, accessed on 22 August 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy

    Sorina Soare

  2. Charles University, Prague, Czechia

    Mattia Collini

Authors
  1. Sorina Soare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mattia Collini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sorina Soare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada

    Lavinia Stan

  2. Ovidius University, Constanta, Romania

    Diane Vancea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soare, S., Collini, M. (2024). Romanian Parties and Post-Communist Democracy. In: Stan, L., Vancea, D. (eds) Post-Communist Progress and Stagnation at 35. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55750-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation