Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Eroding Force of Informal Rules: Romania Between Democracy and Europeanization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Communist Progress and Stagnation at 35

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Democratization was meant to deliver a better quality of governance in the context of increased accountability mechanisms, but the experience of the past thirty-five years has provided a mixed track record of institutional consolidation. European integration has led to an ample record of reforms and civil society groups have championed numerous watchdog initiatives, but poor institutional capacity remains a reality in Romania. The mainstream argument is that institutional consolidation has been undermined by distortive phenomena such as corruption, patronage, and clientelism. The consolidation led by the European Union (EU) has impacted the quality of institutional processes only when coupled with financial conditionalities, that is, only when institutional processes were directly involved in EU-funded programs. In contrast, the Romanian public administration did not undertake consolidation of its own. The duality between the local practices and codes of conduct and the formal compliance with international requirements translated into a superficial institutional consolidation. In the absence of a systematic domestic effort of institutional reform, the gains accumulated over the past decade will continue to stand on a foundation of sand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Andrei, T., Matei, A. I., Tusa, E., & Nedelcu, M. 2009. Characteristics of the reforming process in the Romanian public administration system. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (25E), 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghel, V. 2022. “Informal Institutions: The World’s Open Secrets.” Developments in European Politics 3 (55): 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyero, J. (2000). The logic of clientelism in Argentina: An ethnographic account. Latin American Research Review, 35(3), 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, D. A., & Diamond, L. (Eds.). (2014). Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy. JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustikova, L., & Corduneanu-Huci, C. (2017). Patronage, trust, and state capacity: The historical trajectories of clientelism. World Politics, 69(2), 277–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. C., M. Della Giusta, and U. S. Kambhampati. 2010. “Formal and Informal Institutions and Development.” World Development 38 (2): 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaramonte, A., and V. Emanuele. 2017. “Party System Volatility, Regeneration and De-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015).” Party Politics 23 (4): 376–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coman, R., & Volintiru, C. (2023). Anti-liberal ideas and institutional change in central and Eastern Europe. European Politics and Society, 24(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, V., K. H. Goetz, and H. Wollman. 2006. Governing After Communism: Institutions and Policymaking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, А. 2002. “Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU’s Administrative Capacity Requirement.” West European Politics 25 (4): 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimulescu, V., R. Pop, and M. Doroftei. 2013. “Bottom of the Heap. The Case of Romania.” In Controlling Corruption in Europe. The Anticorruption Report, edited by Alina mungiu-Pippidi, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzs0t.10, accessed 14 December 2023.

  • Doroftei, I. M. 2016. “Measuring Government Favouritism Objectively: The Case of Romanian Public Construction Sector.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 22 (3): 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, T. G. 2005. Theft of a Nation: Romania Since Communism. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2017). A new model of clientelism: Political parties, public resources, and private contributors. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2021). Political parties and clientelism in transition countries: evidence from Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Acta Politica, 56(4), 677–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, S., and C. Volintiru. 2023a. “Clientelism and Political Parties.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties, edited by Neil Carter, Daniel Keith, Gyda M. Sindre, and Sofia Vasilopoulou, 334–345. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, S., & C, Volintiru, C. 2023b. Budgetary Clientelism and Decentralization in Hungary and Romania. Journal of Developing Societies, 39(1), 40-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, C., and N. Hayoz. 2013. Informality in Eastern Europe. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giugăl, A., and I. M. Costinescu. 2020. “Small-Time Clientelism: The Rising Fortunes of the Romanian National Liberal Party, 1990–2016.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 53 (2): 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H., and S. Hix. 2000. Europeanised Politics? European Integration and National Political Systems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. M. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State.” The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research. https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/2004_818-02f_Grzymala-Busse.pdf, accessed 14 December 2023.

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. (2008). Beyond clientelism: Incumbent state capture and state formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 638–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzymała-Busse, A., and P. J. Luong. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism.” Politics & Society 30 (4): 529–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, P., and B. Dobovšek. 2011. “Informal Institutions and EU Accession: Corruption and Clientelism in Central and Eastern Europe.” Paper presented at the ECPR Conference, Rejkavik, 25–27 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, P., Dobovšek, B., & Ažman, B. 2012. Deficiencies in the rule of Law in Slovenia in the context of central and Eastern Europe. Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, T., and K. Deegan-Krause. 2015. “Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 29 (1): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., and S. Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, J. 2002, March. The emergence and convergence of the cartel party: Parties, State and economy in Southern Europe. In panel on “The New Political Economy of European Political Parties.” Conference of Europeanists, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incaltarau, C., G. C. Pascariu, and N. C. Surubaru. 2020. “Evaluating the Determinants of EU Funds Absorption Across Old and New Member States—The Role of Administrative Capacity and Political Governance.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 58 (4): 941–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionita, S., Nutu, O., Stefan, L., & Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2011. Beyond perception. Has Romania’s governance improved after 2004? Romanian Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, J. T. 1999. “The Communist Successor Parties and Party Organizational Development in Post-Communist Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (1): 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, W., R. Hooghiemstra, and M. Feeney. 2018. “Formal Institutions, Informal Institutions, and Red Tape: A Comparative Study.” Public Administration 96 (2): 386–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. R. 1974. “The patron-client concept and macro-politics: Prospects and problems.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(3), 284–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawata, J. (Ed.). (2006). Comparing political corruption and clientelism. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P. 2005. “Democratization and Clientelism: Why Are Young Democracies Badly Governed?” Policy Research Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3594, accessed on 5 December 2023.

  • Killingsworth, M. 2012. Civil Society in Communist Eastern Europe: Opposition and Dissent in Totalitarian Regimes. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. H., J. A. Fallov, and S. Groom. 2020. Public Investment Management Reference Guide. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klima, M. 2020. Informal Politics in Post-Communist Europe: Political Parties. London: Clientelism and State Capture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. 1995. “Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies.” Party Politics 1 (4): 447–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (2013). Democratic accountability and linkages project (Vol. 22, p. 35). Durham, NC: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., and S. I. Wilkinson. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, K. 2008. “Authoritarian Elections in Egypt: Formal Institutions and Informal Mechanisms of Rule.” Democratization 15 (5): 974–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, P., P. Mair, and M. Spirova, eds. 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, P., Meyer sahling, J. H., Panizza, F., Scherlis, G., Schuster, C., & Spirova, M. 2016. Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 416-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, S. 2004. “Personalist Politics, Clientelism and Citizenship: Local Elections in El Alto, Bolivia.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 23 (2): 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., and D. Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manescu, C. 2021. Public Investment Management in the EU: Key Features & Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, I., and L. Young. 2019. Conditionality & coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe.. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Gerd, ed. 2006. Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, Barbara. 2000. Informality: Social Theory and Contemporary Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2020. Europe's Burden: Promoting Good Governance Across Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2019. Effective Public Investment Across Levels of Government: Implementing the OECD principles. Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveros, V. 2016. Making it personal: Clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 48(3), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattoni, S. (Ed.). (2001). Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi‐level governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. European Integration, 31(2), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, E. N., and J. A. Tucker. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. 2005. Designing democracy: EU enlargement and regime change in post-communist Europe. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. 2009. “Securing the Only Game in Town: The EU’s Political Conditionality and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Soviet Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (1): 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O., and M. L. Matichescu. 2011. “Clientelism and Political Recruitment in Democratic Transition: Evidence from Romania.” Comparative Politics 43 (2): 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, S., and N. Wunsch. 2019. “Money, Power, Glory: The Linkages Between EU Conditionality and State Capture in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (1): 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roniger, L. 2004. “Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy.” Comparative Politics 36 (3): 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajó, A. 2003. “From Corruption to Extortion: Conceptualization of Post-Communist Corruption.” Crime, Law and Social Change 40: 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slapin, B. J. 2015. “How European Union Membership Can Undermine the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies.” West European Politics 38 (3): 627–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L., and D. Vancea, eds. 2015. Post-Communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present, and Future. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L., and R. M. Zaharia. 2012. “Romania.” In Life in Post-Communist Eastern Europe After EU Membership, edited by Donnacha O Beachain, Vera Sheridan, and Sabina Stan, 185–204. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S. 2010. The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, M. A. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C. 2015. The exploitative function of party patronage: does it serve the party's interest? East European Politics, 31(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C. 2016. “Clientelism and cartelization in post-communist Europe: The case of Romania” (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C. 2018. “State-Building in Romania.” In The Leap of Faith: The Fiscal Foundations of Successful Government in Europe and America, edited by Sven H. Steinmo, 225–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C., and S. Gherghina. 2023. “We Are in This Together: Stakeholder Cooperation During COVID-19 in Romania.” European Political Science 22 (3): 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C., and S. Nicola. 2024. Limitations of coordinative Europeanisation in the Just Transition Mechanism in Romania. Competition & Change, 10245294241242256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C., and R. M. Zaharia. 2023. “Resilience of the Romanian Healthcare System Under COVID-19 Pandemic.” In Cross-Driven Institutional Resilience: Case Studies of Good Governance in Europe During the Covid-19 Pandemic, edited by Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, José M. Ruano, Alina Georgiana Profiroiu, Saule Maciukaite-Zviniene, and Kosjenka Dumančić, 25–48. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volintiru, C., M. Ionescu-Heroiu, and S. Goga. 2018. “Benchmarking EU Fund Absorption in Romanian Municipalities.” World Bank Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zgut, E. 2022. “Informal Exercise of Power: Undermining Democracy Under the EU’s Radar in Hungary and Poland.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 14 (2–3): 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgut-Przybylska, E. 2023. “Tilting the Playing Field Through Informal Power in Hungary and Poland—How Did Russia’s War in Ukraine Change the EU’s Approach?” Working Papers, Forum Transregionale Studien 23. https://doi.org/10.25360/01-2023-00034.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

    Clara Volintiru

  2. Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Edit Zgut-Przybylska

Authors
  1. Clara Volintiru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edit Zgut-Przybylska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Volintiru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada

    Lavinia Stan

  2. Ovidius University, Constanta, Romania

    Diane Vancea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Volintiru, C., Zgut-Przybylska, E. (2024). The Eroding Force of Informal Rules: Romania Between Democracy and Europeanization. In: Stan, L., Vancea, D. (eds) Post-Communist Progress and Stagnation at 35. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55750-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics