Skip to main content

Theatre and Development in the Pluriverse/Disrupting the Sensible

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theatre and Global Development
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to reimagine theatre, development and partnerships in light of the arguments made thus far. I borrow from emerging critical insights from postdevelopment scholars. In particular, I am interested in what it might mean to reimagine our partnerships in the ‘pluriverse’. Bringing these understandings together with Rancière’s concept of the distribution of the sensible and notions of social justice, I argue that we need to resist and reject common sense assumptions that limit and manage the roles performed by individuals in theatre and development. The forms of reimagined partnerships and modes of collaboration I envisage are predicated on greater equality between partners, on interconnectedness and care, and on the possibilities for partnerships to move away from modernising, interventionist agendas and towards forms of mutually beneficial and reciprocal action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. J. (2016). Applied Theatre and Climate Change in Bangladesh: Indigenous Theatrics for Neoliberal Theatricks. In J. Hughes & H. Nicholson (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Applied Theatre (pp. 150–171). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. J. (2022). Towards a “First Philosophy” of Applied Theatre: Practice of Freedom Embedded in Responsibility for the Other. In K. Sadeghi-Yekta & M. Prendergast (Eds.), Applied Theatre: Ethics (pp. 93–114). Bloomsbury Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artaraz, K., Calestani, M., & Trueba, M. L. (2021). Vivir bien/Buen vivir an Post-Neoliberal Development Paths in Latin America: Scope, Strategies, and the Realities of Implementation. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211009461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, N. (2009). Developing Zapatista Autonomy: Conflict and NGO Involvement in Rural Chiapas. University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. Continuum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, W. C., & Silova, I. (2010). The Ignorant Donor: A Radical Reimagination of International Aid, Development, and Education. Issues in Comparative Education, 13(1), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, T., Yea, S., Peake, L., Skelton, T., & Smith, M. (2012). Geographies of Friendships. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, S. (2021). Applied Theatre: A Pedagogy of Hope. Bloomsbury Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the South. Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contu, A., & Girei, E. (2014). NGOs Management and the Value of ‘Partnerships’ for Equality in International Development: What’s in a Name? Human Relations, 67(2), 205–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, S., Cameron, E. S., & Greenwood, M. L. (2012). Participatory and Community-Based Research, Indigenous Geographies, and the Spaces of Friendship: A Critical Engagement. The Canadian Geographer, 56(2), 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson Baaz, M. (2005). The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2001). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2018a). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of World. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2018b). Transition Discourses and the Politics of Relationality: Toward Designs for the Pluriverse. In B. Reiter (Ed.), Constructing the Pluriverse: The Geopolitics of Knowledge (pp. 63–89). Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, S. (2012). Reconsidering Emancipatory Education: Staging a Conversation Between Paulo Freire and Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory, 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00441.x

  • Kapoor, I. (2023). Decolonising Development Studies. Review of International Studies, 49(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052300013X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayange, G. M. (2018). Meaning and Truth in African Philosophy: Doing African Philosophy with Language. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U. (2005). Authority and Expertise: The Professionalisation of International Development and the Ordering of Dissent. Antipode, 37(3), 424–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U. (2011). Commentary: History, Time and Temporality in Development Discourse. In C. A. Bayly, V. Rao, S. Szreter, & M. Woolcock (Eds.), History, Historians and Development Policy: A Necessary Dialogue (pp. 65–70). Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U., & Klein, E. (2023). Advanced Introduction to Critical Global Development. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. Tulika Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (2008). The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the Dark Night: Essays on Decolonization. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mboti, N. (2015). May the Real Ubuntu Please Stand up? Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 30(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2015.102038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2021). The Politics of Decolonial Investigations. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanaswamy, L. (2023). What Is “Development” and Can We “Decolonise” It? Some Ontological and Epistemological Reflections. In H. Melber, U. Kothari, L. Camfield, & K. Biekart (Eds.), Challenging Global Development: Towards Decoloniality and Justice (pp. 225–236). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngûgî wa Thiong’o. (1993). Moving the Centre: The Struggle for Cultural Freedoms. James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noxolo, P. (2006). A Postcolonial Geographical Critique of ‘Partnership’ in Britain’s Development Discourse. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27(3), 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omasta, M., & Snyder-Young, D. (2014). Gaps, Silences and Comfort Zones: Dominant Paradigms in Educational Drama and Applied Theatre Discourse. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 19(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentki, T. (2015). Applied Theatre: Development. Bloomsbury Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema, M. (1997a). Development and the People’s Immune System: The Story of Another Variety of AIDS. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The Post-Development Reader (pp. 111–131). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema, M. (1997b). Towards Post-Development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The Post-Development Reader (pp. 377–404). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (K. Ross, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible (G. Rockhill, Trans.). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator (G. Elliott, Trans.). Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockhill, G. (2004). Glossary of Technical Terms. In J. Rancière (Ed.), The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible (pp. 83–98) (G. Rockhill, Trans.). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, R., & Omar, R. (2001). Case Study of a North-South Partnership: An Analysis of the Capacity-Building Process between CDS, Cairo and CRDT, UK. In R. James (Ed.), Power and Partnership? Experiences of NGO Capacity-Building (pp. 66–79). INTRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius, R. (2022). The Notion of “Development” in Ubuntu. Religion & Development, 1(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.30965/27507955-20220006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Okuto, M. (2023). Keeping the Peace? Perspectives from Kenyan Practitioners Working in Applied Performance and Peacebuilding on Project Challenges, Funding and Support. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2023.2211932

  • Sou, G. (2022). Aid Micropolitics: Southern Resistance to Racialized and Geographical Assumptions Of Expertise. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Spaces, 40(4), 876–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart Fisher, A., & Thompson, J. (Eds.). (2020). Performing Care: New Perspectives on Socially Engaged Performance. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2020). Towards an Aesthetics of Care. In A. Stuart Fisher & J. Thompson (Eds.), Performing Care: New Perspectives on Socially Engaged Performance (pp. 36–48). Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom, M. (2012). Performance in the Blockades of Neoliberalism: Thinking the Political Anew. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, B. (2024). Theatre and Development in the Pluriverse/Disrupting the Sensible. In: Theatre and Global Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55725-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics