Skip to main content

Evaluating Touchless Haptics for Interaction with Virtual Objects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN 2023)

Abstract

In recent years, touchless (mid-air, hands-free) haptic interactive concepts with machines have gained popularity due to their health benefits and accessible feedback in everyday items. In particular, touchless haptics are particularly effective in creating realistic virtual environments. This paper examines the performance and user experience of touchless haptics for manipulating virtual objects. A comparative study involving seven participants was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a touch controller versus a touchless haptic system (Ultraleap). Participants tested three interaction techniques in a virtual environment, performing a range of control actions on various virtual objects, including adjusting the size and spatial position of geometric volumes and manipulating a lever. Results indicate that while the touch controller remains the preferred tool for simpler tasks due to its ease of learning, touchless haptics reveals nearly as effective when a virtual representation of the user's hands, as visual reference, is incorporated into the immersive environment. Under these conditions, both systems demonstrate comparable effectiveness for specific command and resizing tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Inwook, H., Hyungki, S., Ryong, K.J.: Air piano: enhancing music playing experience in virtual reality with mid-air haptic feedback. IEEE (2017). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7989903. Accessed 3 Feb 2023

  2. Rümelin, S., Gabler, T., Bellenbaum, J.: Clicks are in the air: how to support the interaction with floating objects through ultrasonic feedback. BMW Group (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, F., Lin, Y.-C., Chien, J.-W., Tsai, C.-E.: Virtual reality for digital user experience and interactive learning based on user satisfaction: a pilot study. In: 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 374–377, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI.2016.0077

  4. Ball, C., Johnsen, K.: An accessible platform for everyday educational virtual reality. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR), pp. 26–31, March 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEVR.2016.7859540

  5. Ishikawa, R., Inoue, A., Hoshi, T.: Investigating perceived slope gradient in virtual environment with Visuo-Haptic interaction, vol. 18, pp. 559–562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292234

  6. Amirkhani, S., Nahvi, A.: Design and implementation of an interactive virtual control laboratory using haptic interface for undergraduate engineering students (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21727

  7. Manawadu, U.E., Kamezaki, M., Ishikawa, M., Kawano, T., Sugano, S.: A haptic feedback driver-vehicle interface for controlling lateral and longitudinal motions of autonomous vehicles. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2016.7576753

  8. Martin, S., Hillier, N.: Characterisation of the Novint falcon haptic device for application as a robot manipulator (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gurocak, H., Jayaram, S., Parrish, B., Jayaram, U.: Weight sensation in virtual environments using a haptic device with air jets. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 3(2), 130–135 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1576808

  10. Suzuki, Y., Kobayashi, M.: Air jet driven force feedback in virtual reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25(1), 44–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sodhi, R., Poupyrev, I., Glisson, M., Israr, A.: AIREAL: interactive tactile experiences in free air. ACM Trans. Graph. 32(4), 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2462007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, S., Morris, D., Patel, S.N., Tan, D.: AirWave: non-contact haptic feedback using air vortex rings. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 419–428, September 2013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493463

  13. Hashizume, S., Koike, A., Hoshi, T., Ochiai, Y.: Sonovortex: rendering multi-resolution aerial haptics by aerodynamic vortex and focused ultrasound. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters, pp. 1–2, July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3102163.3102178

  14. Ochiai, Y., Kumagai, K., Hoshi, T., Hasegawa, S., Hayasaki, Y.: Cross-field aerial haptics: rendering haptic feedback in air with light and acoustic fields. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3238–3247, May 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858489

  15. Cha, H., Lee, H., Park, J., Kim, H.-S., Chung, S.-C., Choi, S.: Mid-air tactile display using indirect laser radiation for contour-following stimulation and assessment of its spatial acuity. In: 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 136–141, June 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2017.7989890

  16. Lee, H., et al.: Mid-air tactile stimulation using laser-induced thermoelastic effects: the first study for indirect radiation. In: 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 374–380, June 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2015.7177741

  17. Jun, J.-H., et al.: Laser-induced thermoelastic effects can evoke tactile sensations. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 11016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Spelmezan, D., Sahoo, D.R., Subramanian, S.: Sparkle: hover Feedback with touchable electric arcs. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3705–3717, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025782

  19. Adel, A., Micheal, M.M., Self, M.A., Abdennadher, S., Khalil, I.S.M.: Rendering of virtual volumetric shapes using an electromagnetic-based haptic interface. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1–9, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8593699

  20. Weiss, M., Wacharamanotham, C., Voelker, S., Borchers, J.: FingerFlux: near-surface haptic feedback on tabletops. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 615–620, October 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047277

  21. Boldu, R., Jain, S., Forero Cortes, J.P., Zhang, H., Nanayakkara, S.: M-Hair: creating novel tactile feedback by augmenting the body hair to respond to magnetic field. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 323–328, October 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347955

  22. Rakkolainen, I., Freeman, E., Sand, A., Raisamo, R., Brewster, S.: A survey of mid-air ultrasound haptics and its applications (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2020.3018754

  23. Digital worlds that feel human | Ultraleap. https://www.ultraleap.com/. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  24. Marzo, A., Corkett, T., Drinkwater, B.W.: Ultraino: an open phased-array system for narrowband airborne ultrasound transmission. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 65(1) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2769399

  25. Shen, V., Shultz, C., Harrison, C.: Mouth haptics in VR using a headset ultrasound phased array (2022). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3491102.3501960. Accessed 8 Feb 2023

  26. Singhal, T., Phutane, M.: Elevating haptics: an accessible and contactless elevator concept with tactile mid-air controls (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451574

  27. Singhal, Y., Wang, H., Gil, H., Kim, J.R.: Mid-air thermo-tactile feedback using ultrasound haptic display (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3489849.3489889

  28. Freeman, E.: Enhancing ultrasound haptics with parametric audio effects (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479951

  29. Hung, G.M.Y., John, N.W., Hancock, C., Hoshi, T.: Using and validating airborne ultrasound as a tactile interface within medical training simulators. In: Bello, F., Cotin, S. (eds.) Biomedical Simulation. ISBMS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8789, pp. 30–39. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12057-7_4

  30. Hung, G.M.Y., John, N.W., Hancock, C., Gould, D.A., Hoshi, T.: UltraPulse - simulating a human arterial pulse with focused airborne ultrasound. In: 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 2511–2514, July 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610050

  31. Fu, Y., Lin, W., Yu, X., Rodriguez-Andina, J.J., Gao, H.: Robot-assisted teleoperation ultrasound system based on fusion of augmented reality and predictive force. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 1–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2022.3201322

  32. Harrington, K., Large, D.R., Burnett, G., Georgiou, O.: Exploring the use of mid-air ultrasonic feedback to enhance automotive user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 11–20, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239089

  33. Shakeri, G., Williamson, J.H., Brewster, S.: May the force be with you: ultrasound haptic feedback for mid-air gesture interaction in cars. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 1–10, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239081

  34. Limerick, H., Hayden, R., Beattie, D., Georgiou, O., Müller, J.: User engagement for mid-air haptic interactions with digital signage. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, pp. 1–7, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324944

  35. Corenthy, L., et al.: Touchless tactile displays for digital signage: mid-air haptics meets large screens. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–4, April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186533

  36. Georgiou, O., et al.: Mid-air haptic interfaces for interactive digital signage and kiosks. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–9, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299030

  37. Makino, Y., Furuyama, Y., Inoue, S., Shinoda, H.: HaptoClone (Haptic-Optical Clone) for mutual tele-environment by real-time 3D image transfer with midair force feedback. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1980–1990, May 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858481

  38. Kervegant, C., Raymond, F., Graeff, D., Castet, J.: Touch hologram in mid-air. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies, pp. 1–2, July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084822.3084824

  39. Hoshi, T., Takahashi, M., Iwamoto, T., Shinoda, H.: Noncontact tactile display based on radiation pressure of airborne ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Haptics 3(3), 155–165 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2010.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Matsubayashi, A., Makino, Y., Shinoda, H.: Direct finger manipulation of 3D object image with ultrasound haptic feedback. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300317

  41. The Unreal Garden: Multiplayer Mixed Reality | Ultraleap, Ultraleap (2020). https://www.ultraleap.com/company/news/case-study/unreal-garden/. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  42. Fallen Planet Deepen VR Immersion with Mid-Air Haptics | Ultraleap, Ultraleap (2020). https://www.ultraleap.com/company/news/case-study/fallen-planet-affected/. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  43. Orlosky, J., Itoh, Y., Ranchet, M., Kiyokawa, K., Morgan, J., Devos, H.: Emulation of physician tasks in eye-tracked virtual reality for remote diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 23(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657018

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank F. Pedraza for his technical contribution and participants who volunteered in the user study for their time and support. Additionally, authors acknowledge the funding under grant P ID2020-118249RB-C21 funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana M. Bernardos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bernardos, A.M., Besada, J.A., Cobo, G., Casar, J.R. (2024). Evaluating Touchless Haptics for Interaction with Virtual Objects. In: Clayton, M., Passacantando, M., Sanguineti, M. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2023. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55722-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55722-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55721-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55722-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics