Abstract
In retrospective, the hope—particularly strong in the 1990s—that a vigorous civil society provided a secure pathway towards a robust, consolidated democratic regime and that reinforcing civil society would invariably strengthen the democratic project, seems somewhat naïve. A normative faith in civil society is more difficult to uphold in contemporary times but has not entirely disappeared. There is currently too little reflection on how civil society is itself a sphere of intense democratic and civil struggle, and that civil society forces cannot be necessarily equated with ‘progressive’, liberal-democratic forces or even that progressive activism might not necessarily lead to an overall strengthening of democracy. This chapter reflects on the role of sociology in the study of populism and draws attention to the need for a critical sociology of civil society. The chapter discusses sociological approaches to populism and civil society and outlines a pluralistic approach to populist societal forces and human rights mobilization or ‘lawfare from below’. Three case studies of European conservative uncivil society actors will be briefly analysed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No. 210), available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=210.
- 3.
- 4.
Lautsi and ors v Italy, Merits, App no 30814/06, IHRL 3688 (ECHR 2011), 18 March 2011, European Court of Human Rights [ECHR]; Grand Chamber [ECHR].
- 5.
Puppinck received the honours of Cavaliere della Repubblica by the Italian Government for ECLJ’s services in the Lautsi v Italy case.
References
Agenda Europe (2014), ‘Restoring the Natural Order’, on file with author.
Alexander, J. C. (2006), The civil sphere, Oxford University Press.
Alexander, J. C. (2019), ‘Frontlash/backlash: The crisis of solidarity and the threat to civil institutions’, Contemporary Sociology, 48(1), pp. 5–11.
Alexander, J.C (2020), Introduction. The Populist Continuum from Within the Civil Sphere to Outside It, in: Alexander, J. C., P. Kivisto and G. Sciortino (eds.) (2020), Populism in the civil sphere, John Wiley & Sons.
Alexander, J. C., P. Kivisto and G. Sciortino (eds.) (2020), Populism in the civil sphere, John Wiley & Sons.
Arato, A., J.L. Cohen (1992), Civil Society and Political Theory, MIT Press.
Arato, A., J.L. Cohen (2021), Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy, Oxford University Press.
Bob, C. (2019). Rights as Weapons. Instruments of Conflict, Tools of Power. Princeton University Press.
Bob, C. (2011), ‘Civil and Uncivil Society’, in M.D. Edwards (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, Oxford University Press, pp. 209–219.
Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot (2006), On justification: Economies of worth, Princeton University Press.
Curanović, A. (2020), ‘The International Activity of Ordo Iuris. The Central European Actor and the Global Christian Right’, Religions, 12(12).
Datta, N. (2018), ‘Restoring the natural order: The religious extremists’ vision to mobilise European societies against human rights on sexuality and reproduction’, European Parliamentary Forum on Population & Development (2018), available at: https://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/rtno_epf_book_lores.pdf.
Egholm, L., & Kaspersen, L. B. (2021). ‘Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond Civil Society’: Advancing a Post-sectoral Conception of Civil Society—Moving Beyond Civil Society?’. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 34(2), 143–148.
Eulriet, I. (2014), ‘The Civil Sphere and On Justification: Two Models of Public Culture’, in: S. Susen and B. Turner (eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski. Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, Anthem Press, pp. 413–424.
European Parliament (EP) (2022), REPORT on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2020 and 2021, A-9–2022–0224_EN, 28 July, 2022 available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0224_EN.pdf.
Glasius, M. (2010), ‘Uncivil society’, in H.K. Anheier and S. Toepler (eds), International encyclopedia of civil society, Springer, pp. 1583–1588.
Gloppen, Siri (2018), ‘Conceptualizing Lawfare: A Typology & Theoretical Framework’, Center of Law and Social Transformation Paper, Bergen.
Hann, C. (2020). “In search of civil society: From peasant populism to postpeasant illiberalism in provincial Hungary”. Social Science Information, 59(3), 459–483.
Jones, P. K. (2020), Critical theory and demagogic populism, Manchester University Press.
Kivisto, P., G. Sciortino (2021), ‘Is populism the shadow of the civil. Populism in the civil sphere’, in Alexander, J. C., P. Kivisto and G. Sciortino (eds.) (2020), Populism in the civil sphere, John Wiley & Sons, 287–303.
Kopecký, P. and C. Mudde (2003) (eds), Uncivil society? Contentious politics in post-communist Europe, Routledge.
Nash, K. (2009). The cultural politics of human rights: comparing the US and UK. Cambridge University Press.
Nash, K. (2014). The promise of pragmatic sociology, human rights, and the state. In S. Susen and B. Turner (eds.). The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique, Anthem Press, 351–368.
Ordo Iuris (2018a), ‘Convention on the Rights of the Family’, available at: https://en.ordoiuris.pl/family-and-marriage/convention-rights-family-international-guarantee-defence-families.
Ordo Iuris (2018b), ‘In defence of law and family’, available at: https://en.ordoiuris.pl/family-and-marriage/convention-rights-family-international-guarantee-defence-families.
Paris Statement (2017), ‘The Paris Statement. A Europe we can believe in’, available at: https://thetrueeurope.eu/a-europe-we-can-believe-in/
Petrov, J. (2021), ‘When Should International Courts Intervene? How Populism, Democratic Decay and Crisis of Liberal Internationalism Complicate Things. Review essay, European Journal of International Law, Volume 32, Issue 4, November 2021, pp. 1509–1533.
Pratt, J. and M. Miao (2017), ‘Penal Populism: The End of Reason’, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2017–02, 9 (13) Nova Criminis 71–105.
Puppinck, G. (2022), ‘ “Without fatherhood there cannot be any lasting fatherland” - G. Puppinck at CPAC Hungary’, available at: https://eclj.org/family/eu/-la-destruction-de-la-figure-paternelle-conduit-a-la-destruction-de-la-patrie--gregor-puppinck-a-la-cpac-hongrie.
Roth, K. (2017). ‘The dangerous rise of populism: Global attacks on human rights values’. Journal of International Affairs, THE NEXT WORLD ORDER: Special 70th Anniversary Issue, 79–84.
Ruzza, C. (2009), ‘Populism and euroscepticism: Towards uncivil society?’. Policy and Society, 28(1), 87–98.
Ruzza, C. (2021). ‘The institutionalisation of populist political discourse and conservative uncivil society in the European Union: From the margins to the mainstream?’. Nordicom Review, 42(s1), 119–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blokker, P. (2024). Populism, Human Rights, and (Un-)Civil Society. In: Antoniolli, L., Ruzza, C. (eds) The Rule of Law in the EU. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55322-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55322-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55321-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55322-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)