Skip to main content

Historical Perspectives on the Democratic Deficit(s)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rule of Law in the EU
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter discusses the history of the democratic deficit and its evolution until the 1980s. It is based upon one assumption and has three major aims. The assumption is that in the burgeoning debate on the EU democratic deficit, historians had little to say on its origins and developments, as well as on its evolving meanings. For this reason, the first aim is at discussing the emergence of an early definition of “democratic deficit”. Rather than considering it as an innate feature of the institutions created by the Treaty of Rome, it argues that a specific and clear democratic deficit emerged as the unintended consequence of three decisions adopted at the 1969 Hague Summit, namely the granting of budgetary powers to the not-yet-directly elected European Parliament, the strengthening of majority voting within the Council, and the accession of more sceptical Europeans to the EEC as a consequence of the 1973 enlargement. Second, it will discuss the evolution of the meanings that “democratic deficit” assumed to scholars, politicians and civil society in those years. Finally, it will highlight the main, although partial, solutions elaborated to cope with it before the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ibidem.

  2. 2.

    Ibidem.

References

  • Cohen, A. (2006). De Congrès en Assemblées. La structuration de l’espace politique transnational européen au lendemain de la guerre. Politique Européenne, 1(18): 105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2012). L’autonomisation du Parlement européen. Interdépendance et différenciation des assemblées parlementaires supranationales (années 1950-années 1970). Cultures et Conflits 85-86 : 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conférence de presse de Georges Pompidou, Président de la République, 5 April 1972. In : Archives Nationales (here in after AN), AG/5(2)/90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. (2020). Western Europe’s Democratic Age: 1945–1968. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (2001). The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., Rasmussen, M. (2014). From International Law to a European Rechtsgemeinschaft: Towards a New History of European Law, 1950–1979. In J. Laursen (ed.). The Institutions and Dynamics of the European Community, 1973–83. Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2014: 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEC Budget (1979). In: The Washington Post, 14 December 1979. See also Spinelli, A. (1983). Verso l’Unione Europea, Istituto Universitario Europeo, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • EP minutes of 17 June 1988, European Parliament. OJ C187 (18 July 1988), 229. See also Kaiser, W. (2018). Shaping European Union: The European Parliament and Institutional Reform, 1979–1989, European Parliament History Series, PE 630.271—November 2018, available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/630271/EPRS_STU(2018)630271_EN.pdf (last accession: October 2022).

  • Extracts from the National Union of Conservative and Unionist Associations Annual Conference, 13–16 October 1971, in National Archives (here in after NA), FCO 30/1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feathersome, K. (1994a). Jean Monnet and the ‘Democratic Deficit’ in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 32(2): 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feathersome (1994b); Conway (2020), 144–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal A., Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies. 44(3): 533–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, M. (1975). The Times. 23 May 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M., Pasquinucci, D. (eds) (2020). Euroscepticisms: The Historical Roots of a Political Challenge. Brill, Leiden; Pasquinucci D., Verzechelli, L. (eds) (2016). Contro l'Europa? I diversi scetticismi verso l'integrazione europea. Il Mulino, Bologna. See also the special Issue Counter-narrartive of Europe edited by Richard MacMahon and Wolfram Kaiser of the Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 30/1 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennette, S., Piketty, Th., Sacriste, G., Vauchez, A. (2017). How to Democratize Europe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (or. ed. Pour un traité de démocratisation de l'Europe, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovey, J.A. (1966). The Superparliaments. Interparliamentary Consultation and Atlantic Cooperation, Preager, New York, Washigton DC, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. (2021). Towards a European Constitution? The European Parliament and the Institutional Reform of the European Communities 1979-84. Journal of European Integration History, 27/1: 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, P. (1975). Letter from Strasbourg, The New Yorker, 15 September 1975: 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, A.C.L. (2012). The 1970 and 1975 Budget Treaties: Enhancing the Democratic Architecture of the Community. In: F. Laursen (ed.) Designing the European Union. Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan: 98–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow P.M. (forthcoming: 2023). Making a Rod for its own Back. Explaining Commission Support for Increasing European Parliament Power, 1950-2000. In S. Lorenzini, U. Tulli (eds.). A More Democratic Community?, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P.N. (2015). Safeguarding British Identity or Betraying it? The Role of British Tradition in the Parliamentary Great Debate on EC, in «Journal of Common Market Studies. 53: 18–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggiorani, M. (1998). L’Europa degli altri. Comunisti italiani e integrazione europea. Carocci, Roma: 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchais, G. (1973). Le Défi Démocratique. Bernard. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, D. (1979). Parliament for Europe. Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli R., and Van Waeyenberge A. (2023). EU Responses to the Democratic Defcit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism? Hague Journal on the Rule of Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-023-00198-w

  • Memorandum, 31 January 1970, in Archives de la Fondation Jean Monnet pour l’Europe (hereinafter : FJM) AMK/114/1/36 ; and “Suggestions relatives à l’organisation politique de la Communauté Européenne”, in FJM AMK 114/1/35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memorandum on the Procedures and Practices of the European Parliament, by Mr. Peter Kirk, 16 January 1973. In: Historical Archives of the EU (HAEU), BAC 25/1980 n.506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y. (2009). Building Parliament: 50 Years of European Parliament History, 1958-2008. EUI and Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Florence-Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2002). In Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing the Legitimacy of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4): 603–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2011). Contesting Democracy. Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Europe, Yale University Press, New Heaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer, O. (1991). The 1989 European elections: campaigns and results. European Journal of Political Research, 1(1991): 3–16, here p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Note. In: AN, 5/AG5(2)/90. Association Georges Pompidou (1995). Georges Pompidou et l’Europe. Editions Complexe, Paris ; Hiepel, C. (2016). Willy Brandt et Georges Pompidou La politique européenne de la France et de l’Allemagne entre crise et renouveau. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, Villeneuve-d’Ascq

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. (2014). A Salutary Shock: The European Suffrage Movement and Democracy in the European Community, 1948–1973. Journal of Contemporary European Research 10(1): 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the ECSC Common Assembly, see Guerrieri, S. (2016). Un Parlamento oltre le nazioni. L’Assemblea Comune della Ceca e le sfide dell’integrazione europea (1952–1958). Il Mulino, Bologna; on the evolution of the historiography concerning the European Parliament see Dinan, D. (2018). Historiography of the European Parliament. Changing perceptions of the institution from the 1950s to today. European Parliament History Series. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/630270/EPRS_STU(2018)630270_EN.pdf (last accession: October 2022).

  • Parlamento Europeo. Discussioni. 13 maggio 1970: 77–78 and p.95. See also Relazione a nome della Commissione per le finanze e i bilanci sulle disposizioni prese dal Consiglio delle Comunità europee in merito alla sostituzione dei contributi finanziari degli Stati membri con risorse proprie e alla modifica di talune disposizioni in materia di bilancio dei trattati che istituiscono le comunità europee e del trattato che istituisce un consiglio unici e una commissione unica delle comunità europee, rel. On Spènale. Parlamento Europeo. Documenti di Seduta. 12 maggio 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquinucci, D. (2013). Uniti dal voto? Storia delle elezioni europee, 1948–2009. FrancoAngeli, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Political Affairs Committee (1974). Direct elections to the European Parliament: some working hypotheses, Rapporteur: S. Patijn. 3 April 1974. PE 36.643, HAEU PE0 APRP/POLI.1961 A0–0368/74 0260; Parlement européen, Commission politique (1973). Rapport fait au nom de la commission politique relatif à l'adoption d'un projet de convention instituant l'élection des membres du Parlement européen au suffrage universel direct, Rapporteur : S. Patijn. 12 November 1973. HAEU PE0 AP RP/POLI.1961 A0–0368/74 0270. See also Costa, O. (2016). The history of European electoral reform and the Electoral Act 1976 Issues of democratisation and political legitimacy, European Parliament History Series, November 2016: https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/EPRS-Study-563516-History-European-electoral-reform-1976-Act-FINAL2.pdf

  • Powell, E. (1972). Still to Decide. Batsford, London: 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • rel. On Spènale. Parlamento Europeo. Documenti di Seduta. 12 maggio 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalingi, P. (1979). The European Parliament. The Three Decade Search for a United Europe. Greenwood Press, Westport: 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, A (1981). Der Augenblick der Wahrheit für Rat und Parlament, 21 May 1980. HAEU, AS-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulli, U. (2017a). Un Parlamento per l’Europa. Il Parlamento europeo e la battaglia per la sua elezione (1948–1979). Le Monnier-Mondadori, Firenze-Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulli, U. (2017b). Which democracy for the European Economic Community? Fernand Dehousse versus Charles de Gaulle. Parliaments, Estates, and Representation. 37(3): 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, G. (1975). The Role of the Parliamentary Institution in European Integration”; in European Integration and the Future of Parliaments in Europe. In: European Parliament (ed.). European Parliament—Directorate-General for Research and Documentation, Luxembourg, 1975: 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H., Halter, U., Mayer, F. (1995). European Democracy and its Critique Five Uneasy Pieces. EUI Working Paper RCS No. 95/11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umberto Tulli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tulli, U. (2024). Historical Perspectives on the Democratic Deficit(s). In: Antoniolli, L., Ruzza, C. (eds) The Rule of Law in the EU. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55322-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics