Abstract
As autonomous driving technology continues to advance, ethical dilemmas are emerging that raise complex philosophical, social, and public policy questions. In this paper, we explore the ethical dilemmas that arise when programming autonomous vehicles to make life-and-death decisions in situations where accidents are unavoidable. We begin by examining the trolley problem, a classic ethical thought experiment that has become a popular framework for discussing ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving. We argue that while the trolley problem can be a useful starting point for thinking about ethical dilemmas, it is ultimately limited in its ability to capture the complexity and nuance of real-world situations. There are also social and public policy implications of autonomous driving technology. For instance, the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could lead to significant job loss in the transportation industry. Additionally, there are concerns about the impact of autonomous vehicles on urban planning, such as increased traffic congestion and the need for additional infrastructure. In conclusion, ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving pose significant challenges for society and require careful consideration of philosophical, social, and public policy implications. By engaging in ongoing ethical reflection and dialogue, we can ensure that the development and implementation of autonomous driving technology is guided by principles of justice, fairness, and respect for human dignity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The question that emerges is relative to the ability of the individual to counter the consequences of phenomena beyond his control. Exemplis gratia, no person can prevent an earthquake strike, because that occurrence is out of his control. But is it within his potential to prevent buildings from collapsing, casualties and devastation from occurring? If the answer to this question is affirmative, then it should be expected that the same person is responsible for not preventing grim outcomes.
- 2.
The parameter of time has to be encompassed in this scenario, because even if the passenger realizes the oncoming accident but he has scant time to react, then is he really responsible? If not, then who is?
- 3.
AV technology and connected vehicle technology have a high level of relation, but they are different. AVs with data sharing and location detection could perform more efficiently. However, groups of people dislike that level of interconnection and allege that sensor-based systems could sufficiently support AVs (as footnote in Anderson et al. [1, p. 6]).
References
Anderson, J. M., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O. A.: Autonomous Vehicle Technology. RAND Corporation. Retrieved February 25, 2023, from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR443-2.html (2016)
Applin, S.A.: Autonomous vehicle ethics: stock or custom? IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6, 108–110 (2017)
Bhargava, V., Kim, T.: Autonomous vehicles and moral uncertainty. In: Lin, P., Abney, K., Jenkins, R. (eds.) Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5–19. Oxford University Press, New York (2017)
Blackburn, S.: The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press (2016)
Bradley, F.H.: The limits of individual and national self-sacrifice. Int. J. Ethics. 5(1), 17–28 (1894) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2375504
Coeckelbergh, M.: Responsibility and the moral phenomenology of using self-driving cars. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 748–757 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229759
Contreras-Castillo, J., Zeadally, S., Guerrero-Ibanez, J.: Autonomous cars: challenges and opportunities. IT Prof. 21(6), 6–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2018.2876930
Cunneen, M., Mullins, M., Murphy, F.: Autonomous Vehicles and embedded artificial intelligence: the challenges of framing machine driving decisions. Appl. Artif. Intell. 33(8), 706–731 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1600301
Dean, M.D., Kockelman, K.: Our self-driving future will be shaped by policies of today. Nat. Electron. 5(1), 2–4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00708-4
Driver, J.: The History of Utilitarianism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=utilitarianism-history (2022)
Emory, K., Douma, F., Cao, J.: Autonomous vehicle policies with equity implications: patterns and gaps. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 13, 100521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100521
Etienne, H.: When AI ethics goes astray: a case study of autonomous vehicles. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 40(1), 236–246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320906508
Etienne, H.: The dark side of the ‘moral machine’ and the fallacy of computational ethical decision-making for autonomous vehicles. Law Innov. Technol. 13(1), 85–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898310
Evans, K., de Moura, N., Chauvier, S., Chatila, R., Dogan, E.: Ethical decision making in autonomous vehicles: the AV ethics project. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 26(6), 3285–3312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8
Freeman, S.: Utilitarianism, deontology, and the priority of right. Philos. Public Aff. 23(4), 313–349 (1994) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265463
Hevelke, A., Nida-Rümelin, J.: Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 21(3), 619–630 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5
Heywood, A.: Political Ideologies. (N. Marantzidis, Μεταφρ.) Epikentro, Thessaloniki (2007)
Hussain, R., Zeadally, S.: Autonomous cars: research results, issues, and future challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(2), 1275–1313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2869360
Hussain, R., Lee, J.Y., Zeadally, S.: Autonomous cars: social and economic implications. IT Prof. 20(6), 70–77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2018.2876922
Kateb, G.: Morality and self-sacrifice, martyrdom and self-denial. Soc. Res. 75(2), 353–394 (2008) http://www.jstor.org/stable/40972068
Koopman, P., Kuipers, B., Widen, W., Wolf, M.: Ethics, Safety, and Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Computer Society (2021)
Körner, A., Deutsch, R.: Deontology and utilitarianism in real life: A set of moral dilemmas based on historic events. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 49, 014616722211030 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221103058
Leonard, J.J., Mindell, D., Stayton, E.: Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead. MIT Work for the Future, Cambridge, MA (2020)
Li, J., Zhao, X., Cho, M.-J., Ju, W., Malle, B.F.: From trolley to autonomous vehicle: perceptions of responsibility and moral norms in traffic accidents with self-driving cars. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. (2016). https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0164
Liu, H.-Y.: Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19(3), 193–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9436-2
Loh, W., Loh, J.: Autonomy and responsibility in hybrid systems: the example of autonomous cars. In: Lin, P., Jenkins, R., Abney, K. (eds.) Robot Ethics: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, pp. 35–50. Oxford University Press, New York (2017)
Marchant, G.E., Lindor, R.A.: The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Rev. 52(4), 1321–1340 (2012)
Martínez-Díaz, M., Soriguera, F.: Autonomous vehicles: theoretical and practical challenges. Transp. Res. Proc. 33, 275–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.103
McNaughton, D., Rawling, P.: Deontology and agency. Monist. 76(1), 81–100 (1993) http://www.jstor.org/stable/27903323
Mayer, M.M., Bell, R., Buchner, A.: Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles. PLoS One. 16(12) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261673
Moore, S.: Driverless cars should sacrifice their passengers for the greater good – just not when I’m the passenger. The Conversation Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://theconversation.com/driverless-cars-should-sacrifice-their-passengers-for-the-greater-good-just-not-when-im-the-passenger-61363 (2016, June 23)
Mordue, G., Yeung, A., Wu, F.: The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 132, 174–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.007
National Academy of Engineering: Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2019 Symposium. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2020). https://doi.org/10.17226/25620
Nikitas, A., Parkinson, S., Vallati, M.: The deceitful connected and autonomous vehicle: defining the concept, contextualising its dimensions and proposing mitigation policies. Transp. Policy. 122, 1–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.011
Othman, K.: Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review. AI Ethics. 1(3), 355–387 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8
Rhim, J., Lee, J.-H., Chen, M., Lim, A.: A deeper look at autonomous vehicle ethics: an integrative ethical decision-making framework to explain moral pluralism. Front. Robotics AI. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.632394
Rosati, C.S.: Self-interest and self-sacrifice. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 109, 311–325 (2009) http://www.jstor.org/stable/20619411
Thomson, J.J.: The trolley problem. Yale Law J. 94(6), 1395–1415 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/796133
Urooj, S., Feroz, I., Ahmad, N.: Systematic literature review on user interfaces of autonomous cars: Liabilities and Responsibilities. 2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icacs.2018.8333489
Villasenor, J.: Products Liability and Driverless Cars: Issues and Guiding Principles for Legislation (working paper), pp. 1–25, Brookings (2014)
Wang, H., Khajepour, A., Cao, D., Liu, T.: Ethical decision making in autonomous vehicles: challenges and research progress. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 14, 6–17 (2022)
Wu, S.S.: Autonomous vehicles, trolley problems, and the law. Ethics Inf. Technol. 22(1), 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09506-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saber, E.M., Kostidis, SC., Politis, I. (2024). Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Driving: Philosophical, Social, and Public Policy Implications. In: Parkinson, S., Nikitas, A., Vallati, M. (eds) Deception in Autonomous Transport Systems. Wireless Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55044-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55044-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55043-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55044-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)