Skip to main content

Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Driving: Philosophical, Social, and Public Policy Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deception in Autonomous Transport Systems

Part of the book series: Wireless Networks ((WN))

  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

As autonomous driving technology continues to advance, ethical dilemmas are emerging that raise complex philosophical, social, and public policy questions. In this paper, we explore the ethical dilemmas that arise when programming autonomous vehicles to make life-and-death decisions in situations where accidents are unavoidable. We begin by examining the trolley problem, a classic ethical thought experiment that has become a popular framework for discussing ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving. We argue that while the trolley problem can be a useful starting point for thinking about ethical dilemmas, it is ultimately limited in its ability to capture the complexity and nuance of real-world situations. There are also social and public policy implications of autonomous driving technology. For instance, the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could lead to significant job loss in the transportation industry. Additionally, there are concerns about the impact of autonomous vehicles on urban planning, such as increased traffic congestion and the need for additional infrastructure. In conclusion, ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving pose significant challenges for society and require careful consideration of philosophical, social, and public policy implications. By engaging in ongoing ethical reflection and dialogue, we can ensure that the development and implementation of autonomous driving technology is guided by principles of justice, fairness, and respect for human dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The question that emerges is relative to the ability of the individual to counter the consequences of phenomena beyond his control. Exemplis gratia, no person can prevent an earthquake strike, because that occurrence is out of his control. But is it within his potential to prevent buildings from collapsing, casualties and devastation from occurring? If the answer to this question is affirmative, then it should be expected that the same person is responsible for not preventing grim outcomes.

  2. 2.

    The parameter of time has to be encompassed in this scenario, because even if the passenger realizes the oncoming accident but he has scant time to react, then is he really responsible? If not, then who is?

  3. 3.

    AV technology and connected vehicle technology have a high level of relation, but they are different. AVs with data sharing and location detection could perform more efficiently. However, groups of people dislike that level of interconnection and allege that sensor-based systems could sufficiently support AVs (as footnote in Anderson et al. [1, p. 6]).

References

  1. Anderson, J. M., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O. A.: Autonomous Vehicle Technology. RAND Corporation. Retrieved February 25, 2023, from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR443-2.html (2016)

  2. Applin, S.A.: Autonomous vehicle ethics: stock or custom? IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6, 108–110 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhargava, V., Kim, T.: Autonomous vehicles and moral uncertainty. In: Lin, P., Abney, K., Jenkins, R. (eds.) Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5–19. Oxford University Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, S.: The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley, F.H.: The limits of individual and national self-sacrifice. Int. J. Ethics. 5(1), 17–28 (1894) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2375504

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Coeckelbergh, M.: Responsibility and the moral phenomenology of using self-driving cars. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 748–757 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Contreras-Castillo, J., Zeadally, S., Guerrero-Ibanez, J.: Autonomous cars: challenges and opportunities. IT Prof. 21(6), 6–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2018.2876930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunneen, M., Mullins, M., Murphy, F.: Autonomous Vehicles and embedded artificial intelligence: the challenges of framing machine driving decisions. Appl. Artif. Intell. 33(8), 706–731 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1600301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean, M.D., Kockelman, K.: Our self-driving future will be shaped by policies of today. Nat. Electron. 5(1), 2–4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00708-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Driver, J.: The History of Utilitarianism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=utilitarianism-history (2022)

  11. Emory, K., Douma, F., Cao, J.: Autonomous vehicle policies with equity implications: patterns and gaps. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 13, 100521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Etienne, H.: When AI ethics goes astray: a case study of autonomous vehicles. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 40(1), 236–246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320906508

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Etienne, H.: The dark side of the ‘moral machine’ and the fallacy of computational ethical decision-making for autonomous vehicles. Law Innov. Technol. 13(1), 85–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans, K., de Moura, N., Chauvier, S., Chatila, R., Dogan, E.: Ethical decision making in autonomous vehicles: the AV ethics project. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 26(6), 3285–3312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman, S.: Utilitarianism, deontology, and the priority of right. Philos. Public Aff. 23(4), 313–349 (1994) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hevelke, A., Nida-Rümelin, J.: Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 21(3), 619–630 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heywood, A.: Political Ideologies. (N. Marantzidis, Μεταφρ.) Epikentro, Thessaloniki (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hussain, R., Zeadally, S.: Autonomous cars: research results, issues, and future challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(2), 1275–1313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2869360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hussain, R., Lee, J.Y., Zeadally, S.: Autonomous cars: social and economic implications. IT Prof. 20(6), 70–77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2018.2876922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kateb, G.: Morality and self-sacrifice, martyrdom and self-denial. Soc. Res. 75(2), 353–394 (2008) http://www.jstor.org/stable/40972068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koopman, P., Kuipers, B., Widen, W., Wolf, M.: Ethics, Safety, and Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Computer Society (2021)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Körner, A., Deutsch, R.: Deontology and utilitarianism in real life: A set of moral dilemmas based on historic events. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 49, 014616722211030 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221103058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leonard, J.J., Mindell, D., Stayton, E.: Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead. MIT Work for the Future, Cambridge, MA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, J., Zhao, X., Cho, M.-J., Ju, W., Malle, B.F.: From trolley to autonomous vehicle: perceptions of responsibility and moral norms in traffic accidents with self-driving cars. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. (2016). https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0164

  25. Liu, H.-Y.: Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19(3), 193–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9436-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Loh, W., Loh, J.: Autonomy and responsibility in hybrid systems: the example of autonomous cars. In: Lin, P., Jenkins, R., Abney, K. (eds.) Robot Ethics: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, pp. 35–50. Oxford University Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marchant, G.E., Lindor, R.A.: The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Rev. 52(4), 1321–1340 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martínez-Díaz, M., Soriguera, F.: Autonomous vehicles: theoretical and practical challenges. Transp. Res. Proc. 33, 275–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McNaughton, D., Rawling, P.: Deontology and agency. Monist. 76(1), 81–100 (1993) http://www.jstor.org/stable/27903323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mayer, M.M., Bell, R., Buchner, A.: Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles. PLoS One. 16(12) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261673

  31. Moore, S.: Driverless cars should sacrifice their passengers for the greater good – just not when I’m the passenger. The Conversation Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://theconversation.com/driverless-cars-should-sacrifice-their-passengers-for-the-greater-good-just-not-when-im-the-passenger-61363 (2016, June 23)

  32. Mordue, G., Yeung, A., Wu, F.: The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 132, 174–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. National Academy of Engineering: Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2019 Symposium. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2020). https://doi.org/10.17226/25620

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Nikitas, A., Parkinson, S., Vallati, M.: The deceitful connected and autonomous vehicle: defining the concept, contextualising its dimensions and proposing mitigation policies. Transp. Policy. 122, 1–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Othman, K.: Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review. AI Ethics. 1(3), 355–387 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhim, J., Lee, J.-H., Chen, M., Lim, A.: A deeper look at autonomous vehicle ethics: an integrative ethical decision-making framework to explain moral pluralism. Front. Robotics AI. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.632394

  37. Rosati, C.S.: Self-interest and self-sacrifice. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 109, 311–325 (2009) http://www.jstor.org/stable/20619411

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomson, J.J.: The trolley problem. Yale Law J. 94(6), 1395–1415 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/796133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Urooj, S., Feroz, I., Ahmad, N.: Systematic literature review on user interfaces of autonomous cars: Liabilities and Responsibilities. 2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icacs.2018.8333489

  40. Villasenor, J.: Products Liability and Driverless Cars: Issues and Guiding Principles for Legislation (working paper), pp. 1–25, Brookings (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, H., Khajepour, A., Cao, D., Liu, T.: Ethical decision making in autonomous vehicles: challenges and research progress. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 14, 6–17 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu, S.S.: Autonomous vehicles, trolley problems, and the law. Ethics Inf. Technol. 22(1), 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09506-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Politis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saber, E.M., Kostidis, SC., Politis, I. (2024). Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Driving: Philosophical, Social, and Public Policy Implications. In: Parkinson, S., Nikitas, A., Vallati, M. (eds) Deception in Autonomous Transport Systems. Wireless Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55044-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55044-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55044-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics