Skip to main content

Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of the Chinnar Sub-Basin, Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern River Science for Watershed Management

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 128))

  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

An essential tool for examining drainage networks, exploring geomorphological characteristics, and connecting them to future basin management plans is remote sensing technology based on satellites. The linear, aerial, and relief features of the geomorphologic development and river basin's potential for groundwater are evaluated quantitatively using morphometric analysis. In this paper, an attempt was made to investigate the specific morphometric features of the Chinnar sub-basin. Here, 56 morphometric parameters across all dimensions have been computed. One of the main tributaries of the Cauvery River, the Chinnar sub-basin flows through the Dharmapuri District in Tamil Nadu, India. The drainage network, basin geometry, texture analysis, and terrain features have all been covered in the quantitative morphometric analysis (QMA) of the Chinnar sub-basin. The Strahler classification method was utilized to describe the drainage network, and the results suggest that the topography displays drainage patterns including dendritic, parallel, radial, and trellis. The research region was classified as seventh-order, and lower-order streams predominate there, which is a key contributor to flash floods. The average bifurcation ratio shows that there were several structural disturbances in the area. The Chinnar sub-basin covers 1539.784 km2 in total. The Chinnar sub-basin's elongation ratio is 0.449, and its circularity ratio is 0.255, indicating that the basin has an elongated form. With 2.407 km/km2, the research area’s drainage density is high. The calculated value of 21.738 demonstrates the basin’s fine drainage texture. The basin is made up of low-erodible rocks and requires a minimum area of 0.415 km2 to develop a channel. The south-western section has a strong slope, as shown by the basin slope, which runs from 0° to 58°. The sub-basin's relief ratio indicates that both pediplain and hilly zones are involved. Several themed maps, including those for drainage density, relief, contour, slope, and aspect, were produced using the ArcGIS software. QMA is essential to controlling the drainage basin. The study comes to a conclusion by analyzing the findings of QMA parameters and thematic data to comprehend the geomorphological issues and the sustainable development of water resources in the Chinnar sub-basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beg AAF (2015) Morphometric toolbox: a new technique in basin morphometric analysis using ArcGIS. Global J Earth Sci Eng 2015(2):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ (1957) Illustrating the laws of morphometry. Geol Mag 94:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity—a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner V (1975) Drainage basin morphometry, British Geomorphological Group. Techn Bull 14:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelius H (1914) Flusskunde. Goschen’sche Verlagshandlung, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1976) Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack JT (1957) Studies of longitudinal profiles in Virginia and Maryland, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294(B):45–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1957) An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology, vol 389042, issue 11. Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1965) The geomorphic and palaeoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in Southern Arizona. J Geol 73:1–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/627044

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area, NR Technical Report 3: Va. and Tenn. Office Naval Research Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareta and Pareta (2011) Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna Basin, India using aster (DEM) data and GIS. Int J Geomatics Geosci 2(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich JL (1916) A geographical method of determining the average inclination of a land surface from a contour map. Trans Ill Acad Sci 9:195

    Google Scholar 

  • Satheeshkumar S, Venkateswaran S (2018) Predilection of sustainable recharge structures using morphometric parameters and decision making model in the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Appl Water Sci 8:213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0844-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67:597646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA, Lichty RW (1965) Time, space and causality in geomorphology. Am J Sci 263:110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve RL (1966) Statistical law of stream numbers. J Geol 74:1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Dubey A (1994) Geoenvironmental planning of watersheds in Indian. Chugh Publications, Allahabad, pp 28–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart JS, Surkan AJ (1967) The relation between mainstream length and area in drainage basins. Water Resour Res 3(4):963–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Ahmed S (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol 47(3):412–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:923–938. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606%281952%2963%5B923:DBOG%5D2.0.CO%3B2

  • Strahler A (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow V (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 439–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan A (2014) Geoinformatics in fluvial geomorphological study of Thoppaiyar Sub-Basin, Tamil Nadu, India

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Pragatheeswaran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval:

Authors confirm that appropriate ethics were adopted during the period of experimentation and documentation.

Consent to publish:

All authors agree to publish this manuscript. There is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harish, M.K., Pragatheeswaran, P., Thirukumaran, V. (2024). Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of the Chinnar Sub-Basin, Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India. In: Satheeshkumar, S., Thirukumaran, V., Karunanidhi, D. (eds) Modern River Science for Watershed Management. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 128. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54704-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics