Abstract
In this chapter, I take three steps to discuss the merits and demerits of denial strategy. First, I explore how the strategy is designed to protect defenders from attackers in authoritarian regimes. I also point out a range of challenges that democracies have faced in cyberspace, which has generated preference for restraint and made denial defense a default response for many states. The second section focuses on challenges with denial strategy, including those of technical, political, and strategic nature, which render it a subpar strategy after all. Finally, I stress the importance of defensive interventions after breaches and examine how democracies may recover from incidents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katagiri, N. (2024). Why Defensive Measures Are Too Defensive: Strategy of Denial. In: How Liberal Democracies Defend Their Cyber Networks from Hackers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54561-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54561-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54560-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54561-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)