Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Nature of Narration in Cinematic Virtual Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Screenwriting for Virtual Reality

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting ((PSIS))

  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the dynamics of narration in cinematic virtual reality filmmaking (CVR), with a focus on the options for the positioning of the viewer, who find themselves in the middle of the story world, with control over their gaze. Through the use of a case study that involved the development of three short CVR film works, the chapter establishes the main ways to conceptualise viewer positioning: either as an invisible and unacknowledged presence; an acknowledged but invisible character; or as an embodied being visible to other characters in the story world. The chapter argues that once a viewer is acknowledged, they become a character in the world, almost certainly present in every scene, and known or knowable to other characters. This type of presence demands a high level of consideration from the screenwriter, much as any central character in a narrative would receive. With embodiment comes another set of challenges, both technical and ethical, but whatever positioning is chosen, CVR filmmakers need to fully consider the changed nature of narration with the medium in order to make the best use of its immersive properties and ability to generate emotion and empathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worth noting here that the term “first-person POV”, when applied to VR, refers to the point of view of the viewer NOT the narrator (as with literary point of view). The first-person POV of a CVR viewer corresponds more accurately with second-person point of view of the literary narrator (i.e., “you do this, and then “you do that”).

References

  • Arnott, Peter. 1991. Public and Performance in the Greek Theatre. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, Craig. 2013. Screenplays: How to write and sell them. Croydon: Creative Essentials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Susan. 2013. Theatre Audiences. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bindman, Samantha. et al. 2018. “Am I a Bunny?: The Impact of High and Low Immersion Platforms and Viewers’ Perceptions of Role on Presence, Narrative Engagement, and Empathy during an Animated 360° Video.” CHI 2018, April 21–26, 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174031

  • Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, Edward. 1984. Point of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, Francesco. 2008. Eye of the Century: Film, Experience, Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catricala, Valentino. and Eugeni, Ruggero. 2020. “Technologically Modified Self-Centred Worlds: Modes of Presence as Effects of Sense in Virtual, Augmented, Mixed and Extended reality”. In Meaning-Making in Extended Reality, edited by Federico Biggio, Victoria Dos Santos, Gianmarco Thierry Giuliana, 63–90. Rome: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, James, and Magnus Moar. 2018. “VR and the dramatic theatre: Are they fellow creatures?.” International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 14 (2): 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Adam. 2016. “VR Cinema is here—and Audiences are in the drivers’ seat.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://theconversation.com/vr-cinema-is-here-and-audiences-are-in-the-drivers-seat-66677.

  • Dolan, Devon. and Michael Parets. 2016. “Redefining The Axiom Of Story: The VR And 360 Video Complex.” Accessed February 21, 2022. https://techcrunch.com/2016/01/14/redefining-the-axiom-of-story-the-vr-and-360-video-complex/.

  • Dooley, Kath. 2020. “A Question of Proximity: Exploring a New Screen Grammar for 360-degree Cinematic Virtual Reality.” Media Practice and Education 21 (2): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2019.1641005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Joel. 2002. Oscar Winning Screenwriters on Screenwriting. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjestland, Rolv. 2019. “A Best Practices Guide: Viewing Conditions”. European Digital Cinema Forum. Accessed 10 February 2022. http://www.edcf.net/edcf_docs/EDCF_ABestPracticesGuide_Architecture_ViewingConditions.pdf

  • Gödde, Michael. et al (2018) “Cinematic Narration in VR – Rethinking Film Conventions for 360 Degrees.” In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Health, Cultural Heritage, and Industry edited by Jessie Chen and Gino Fragomeni, 184–201. VAMR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10910. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, Bree. 2021 “Putting Prejudices on the Spot and in the Spotlight: The Risks of Politically Motivated Public Space Performance Practices.” In Risk, Participation, and Performance Practice 57–78, edited by Alice O’Grady. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juul, Lisa. 2018. Examining 360° Storytelling in Immersive Music Videos. PhD diss.: Malmo University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellmeyer, Phillip. 2018. “Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4): 610–627. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180118000129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Frank. 2013. “The Gentleman in the Stalls: Georges Méliès and Spectatorship in Early Cinema.” In Audiences, ed. Ian Christie, 35–44. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jihoon. 2021. “Synthetic Vision in Virtual Reality Documentaries.” Film-Philosophy 25 (3): 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Mads. 2018. “Virtual Sidekick: Second-person POV in Narrative.” VR Journal of Screenwriting 9: 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Ian. 2013. Screenwriting Poetics and the Screen Idea. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maras, Steven. 2016. Ethics in Screenwriting. London: Palgrave. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mateer, John. 2017. Directing for Cinematic Virtual reality: How the Traditional Film Director’s Craft Applies to Immersive Environments and Notions of Presence.” Journal of Media Practice 18 (1): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, Robert. 2008. Story: Style, Structure, Substance, and the Principles of Screenwriting. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Katy. and Karen Soukup. 2016. “The Storyteller’s Guide to the Virtual Reality Audience.” Medium, 7 April, Accessed February 16, 2022. https://medium.com/stanford-d-school/the-storyteller-s-guide-to-the-virtual-reality-audience-19e92da57497#.8yfdtcs18.

  • Nicolae, Dana. 2018. “Spectator Perspectives in Virtual reality Cinematography. The Witness, the Hero and the Impersonator”. Ekphrasis 2 Cinema, Cognition and Art DOI:https://doi.org/10.24193/ekphrasis.20.10.

  • Ramirez, Erick, et al. 2021. “What it’s like to be a _____: Why it’s (often) Unethical to use VR as an Empathy Nudging Tool.” Ethics and Information Technology 23: 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, Erick, and Scott LaBarge. 2018. Real moral problems in the use of virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology 20: 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, Sylvia, et al. 2019. “Guidance in Cinematic Virtual Reality-Taxonomy, Research Status and Challenges.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxborough, Scott. 2017. “Alejandro G. Inarritu Embraces Virtual Reality” . The Hollywood Reporter 24 May 2017, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/alejandro-g-inarritu-embraces-virtual-reality-but-dont-call-cinema-1006881/.

  • Serrano, Ana. et al. 2017. “Movie Editing and Cognitive Event Segmentation in Virtual Reality Video”. ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 36.4.47: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamburger, Mary, and Vera Lachmann. 1946. “Southey and “The Three Bears.” The Journal of American Folklore. 59 (234): 400–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. 1983. The Subject of Semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Mel et al. 2020. “The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality”. Frontiers in Virtual Reality Volume 1. Accessed 2 March 2022 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00001/full

  • The American Heritage Medical Dictionary. S.v. “fovea centralis.” Retrieved August 26 2022 from https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fovea+centralis

  • Tian, Feng, et al. 2021. “A High-Density EEG Study Investigating VR Film Editing and Cognitive Event Segmentation Theory.” Sensors 21 (7176): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Lingwei, et al. 2021. Viewer’s Role and Viewer Interaction in Cinematic Virtual Reality.” Computers 10 (66): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaving, Simon. 2021. “Evoke, don’t show: Narration in Cinematic Virtual Reality and the Making of Entangled.” Virtual Creativity 11 (1): 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Jing, and Bernhard Hommel. 2016. “Body Ownership and Response to Threat.” Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 80: 1020–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuver, Embrie. 1915. How to Write Photoplays. New York: E-Z Scenario Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Creative Industries, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

    Simon Weaving

Authors
  1. Simon Weaving
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Weaving .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The University of South Australia, Adelaide, WA, Australia

    Kath Dooley

  2. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Alex Munt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weaving, S. (2024). The Nature of Narration in Cinematic Virtual Reality. In: Dooley, K., Munt, A. (eds) Screenwriting for Virtual Reality . Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54100-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation