Skip to main content

Writing the Virtual: Diverse Modes of Development in Cinematic Virtual Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Screenwriting for Virtual Reality

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting ((PSIS))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

In order to speak of CVR as an emergent paradigm of practice, one must develop a vocabulary concomitant with its formal and aesthetic principles—its operative and experiential ground rules. Towards the end, this chapter offers a historiography of practice, that traces the development of ideas and evolution of form in this emergent medium, through a close reading of some early trailblazing works. While Morton Heilig’s Sensorama of the late 1950s, and Char Davies’ Osmose (1995) may be considered early precedents of CVR as we know it today, it is around 2015, with VR consumer headsets becoming widely available in the market, that a spurt of documentary and fiction content begins to proliferate in this fledgling medium. Among them Notes on Blindness (2016) Invasion (2016) and Testimony (2017) stand out for shaping CVR discourse in terms of their development process, the nascent screenwriting concepts they employ, and the experience design they propose. In each instance the approach of the CVR writer-designer tends towards an aesthetics of revelation and epiphany rather than purgation and catharsis as I will show, suggesting that this is the new paradigm that CVR heralds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 26 May 2024

    A correction has been published.

Bibliography

  • Bachelard, Gaston. 1969. The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language, and the Cosmos. Translated by Danie Russell. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Joseph. 1949.The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Bollingen series XVII. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinart, Arnaud. 2016. Notes on Blindness. Arte Experiences. VR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinart, Arnaud. 2017. The Hacking VR Speaker Series:Arnaud Colinart. MIT Open Documentary Lab. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQb-iZOP3Zg.

  • Darnell, Eric. 2016a. Virtual Reality: Jump into Story. Ted X Cincinnati. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpsc1XHf0Ok.

  • Darnell, Eric. 2016b. Invasion VR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, Eric and Kent Bye. 2016. “Storytelling in VR and the Trade-offs of Empathy and Interactivity” in Voices of VR: Designing for Virtual Reality. Episode # 290. https://voicesofvr.com/290-storytelling-in-vr-the-tradeoffs-of-empathy-and-interactivity.

  • Davies, Char. 1995. Osmose. Interactive Virtual Experience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char with Alex Davis. 1996. “Osmose”. https://www.wired.com/1996/08/osmose/.

  • Davies, Char. 1998a. “Osmose: Notes on Being in Immersive Virtual Space.” Digital Creativity 9 (2): 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char. 1998b. “Changing Space: Virtual Reality as an Arena of Embodied Being.” In The Virtual Dimension: Architecture, Representation and Crash Culture, edited by John Beckman, 144–155. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Accessed at http://www.immersence.com on 9 February 2022.

  • Davies, Char. 2000. “Landscape, Earth, Body, Being, Space and Time in the Immersive Virtual Environments Osmose and Ephémère.” In Emergent Futures: Art, Interactivity and New Media, edited by Angela Molena and Kepa Landa, 47–58. Valencia, Spain: Institució Alfonse el Magnànim, Disputació de València.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char. 2002. “Osmose: Notes on Being in Immersive Virtual Space.” In Digital Creativity: A Reader, edited by Colin Beardon and Lone Malmborg, 101–110. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char. 2003. “Rethinking VR: Key Concepts and Concerns.” In Hybrid Reality: Art, Technology and the Human Factor, 253–262. Montreal, Canada: International Society on Virtual Systems and Multimedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char. 2004. “Virtual Space.” In Space: In Science, Art and Society, edited by Francoise Penz, Gregory Radick and Robert Howell, 69–104. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Char. 2005. Landscapes of Ephemeral Embrace: A Painter’s Exploration of Immersive Virtual Space as a Medium for Transforming Perception. Doctoral dissertation. University of Plymouth. https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk.

  • Dooley, Kath. 2021. Cinematic Virtual Reality: A Critical Study of 21st Century Approaches and Practices. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Scott. 1990. “Virtual Interface Environments.” In The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, edited by Brenda Laurel. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, Katherine N. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, Carrie. 1992. “Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence.” Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (2): 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilig, Morton Leonard. 1992. “EL Cine del Futuro: The Cinema of the Future.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (3): 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.279.

  • Hockney, D., and M. Gayford. 2014. A History of Pictures: From the Cave to the Computer Screen, London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, John. 1992. Touching the Rock: An Experience of Blindness. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahmke, Astrid. 2022. Cinematic VR. WIIT: Women in Immersive Technology. https://www.wiiteurope.org/events?view=calendar&month=02-2022.

  • Kfir, Zohar. 2017. Testimony VR. Kaleidoscope.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kfir, Zohar. 2018. The Evolution of Testimony, February 16. https://immerse.news/interactive-listening-the-evolution-of-a-social-impact-project-592986a932e6. Accessed 18 February 2023.

  • Langer, Susanne K. 1944. The Lord of Creation. http://www.anthonyflood.com/langer/lordofcreation.htm.

  • Lanier, Jaron. 2017. Dawn of the New Everything. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartigue, Beatrice. 2016a. Designing for VR. Notes on Blindness: Into Darkness. https://medium.com/@cats_/designing-for-vr-9206081a3f1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartigue, Beatrice. 2016b. “Notes on Blindness.” Lab212. https://lab212.org/oeuvres/3:featured/10/Notes-onBlindness.

  • Laurel, Brenda in Erik Davis. 1996. “Osmose”, WIRED. https://www.wired.com/1996/08/osmose/.

  • Macdonald, Ian W. 2016. “The Object That Is Not Yet an Object: The Screen Idea.” In Atas do VI Encontro Annual da AIM, editado por Paulo Cunha, Susana Viegas e Maria Guilhermina Castro, 10–26. Lisboa: AIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateer, John. 2017. “Directing for Cinematic Virtual Reality: How the Traditional Film Director’s Craft Applies to Immersive Environments and Notions of Presence.” Journal of Media Practice 18 (1): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Nate 2015. Introducing Oculus Story Studio. Oculus Story Studio. https://vimeo.com/117849907.

  • Meta Quest, Connect 2. 2015. Lessons from Hollywood: Making Movies in VR. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2E_kfNPytA.

  • Oliver, Kelly. 2000. “Beyond Recognition: Witnessing Ethics.” Philosophy Today 44 (1) (Spring): 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Kelly. 2001. Witnessing, Beyond Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Kelly. 2015. “Witnessing, Recognition, and Response Ethics.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (4) Special Issue: The Rhetorical Contours of Recognition): 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Miriam and Alex Munt. 2018. “Cinematic Virtual Reality: Towards the Spatialized Screenplay.” Journal of Screenwriting 9 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudhamini. 2020. “The CVR Screenplay as a Moebius Strip.” Journal of Screenwriting 11 (2): 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudhamini. 2021. “Theorising the Virtual: An Unfinished Conversation with Thomas Elsaesser.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 38 (7): 676–693.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soudhamini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soudhamini (2024). Writing the Virtual: Diverse Modes of Development in Cinematic Virtual Reality. In: Dooley, K., Munt, A. (eds) Screenwriting for Virtual Reality . Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54100-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics