Skip to main content

Freeways

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 84))

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

Freeways are defined as those facilities that afford uninterrupted flow of traffic, i.e., there is full access control. Control of access refers to public access rights from properties along the freeway; access to freeway facilities is allowed only through selected public roads, typically on- and off-ramps [1]. Thus, freeways generally operate at higher speeds and higher capacities than urban arterial streets or local roadways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Transportation Research Board. 2022. Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets”, 7th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FHWA, Highway Statistics 2020, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2020/vm202.cfm.

  4. https://www.greencarcongress.com/2021/03/20210316-sivak.html#:~:text=For%20the%20entire%20United%20States,percentage%20of%20current%20truck%20traffic.

  5. Courage, K., “Implementation and Evaluation of a Moving Merge Control System in Tampa”, FHWA-RD-78-29 Final Report, April 1979, pp. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kondyli, A., L. Elefteriadou, “Modeling Driver Behavior at Freeway-ramp Merges,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, January 2011, pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elefteriadou, L., R.P. Roess, W.R. McShane, “The Probabilistic Nature of Breakdown at Freeway – Merge Junctions,” Transportation Research Record 1484, National Academy Press, 1995, pp. 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brilon, W., L. Elefteriadou, A. Kondyli, F. Hall, B. Persaud, S. Washburn, “Proactive Ramp Metering Based on Breakdown Probabilities”, 6th International Symposium for Highway Capacity, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coifman, B., Mishalani, R.G., Wang, C., Krishnamurthy, S. 2006. Impacts of Lane Change Maneuvers on Congested Freeway Segment Delays, pilot study. Transportation Research Record. no. 1965. pp. 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ci Y., Wu L., Pei Y., Ling X. Gap Acceptance Capacity Model for On-Ramp Junction of Urban Freeway. J Transportation Sys Eng & IT, 2009, 9(4), pp.116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lertworawanich, P., L. Elefteriadou, “A Methodology for Estimating Capacity at Ramp Weaves Based on Gap Acceptance and Linear Optimization,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological Vol. 37B, No. 5, June 2003, pp. 459–483.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freeway Management and Operations Handbook, FHWA-OP-04-003, 2006 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/publications/frwy_mgmt_handbook/fmoh_complete_all.pdf.

  13. Ramp Management and Control Handbook. FHWA-HOP-06-001, January 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kondyli, A., L. Elefteriadou, W. Brilon, F. Hall, B. Persaud, and S. Washburn “Enhancing Ramp Metering Algorithms with the Use of Probability of Breakdown Models”, ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Volume 140, Number 4, 9 pages, April 2014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000653.

  15. A. Mizuta, K. Roberts, L. Jacobsen, N. Thompson. Ramp Metering: A Proven, Cost Effective Operational Strategy – A Primer, FHWA-HOP-14-020, October 2014. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop14020/fhwahop14020.pdf.

  16. FHWA-SA-21-054 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/variable-speed-limits.cfm.

  17. Elefteriadou, L., S. Washburn, Y. Yin, V. Modi, C. Letter “Variable Speed Limits: Best Management Practice” Final Report BDK77-TWO977-11, Florida Department of Transportation, August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/mngd_lns_hov.htm, Accessed February 7, 2023.

  19. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12031/fhwahop12027/index.htm, Accessed February 7, 2023.

  20. Michalaka, D. “Enhancement and Evaluation of Dynamic Pricing Strategies of Managed Toll Lanes”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carson, J., “Best Practices in Traffic Incident Management”, Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-050, College Station, TX, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, B., “Efficient Use of Highway Capacity Summary”, Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-023. College Station, TX, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Amini, E., Xu, D., Rouphail, N., Elefteriadou, L., Aghdashi, B. “Capacity Analysis Framework for Freeway Ramp Weaves”, ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Volume 147, Issue 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000594.

  24. https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/summer-1994/ivhs-architecture-program-systematic-approach-progress Accessed February 7, 2023.

  25. https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/summer-1994/automated-highway-system-idea-whose-time-has-come Accessed February 7, 2023.

  26. https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub2/thorpe_charles_1997_2/thorpe_charles_1997_2.pdf Accessed March 2, 2023.

  27. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Grand_Challenge#2004_Grand_Challenge Accessed March 2, 2023.

  28. https://www.its.dot.gov/pilots/index.htm Accessed March 2, 2023.

  29. Letter, Clark. Freeway Congestion Mitigation Using Advanced Vehicle and Communication Technology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Daamen, W., van Arem, B., & Bouma, I. 2011. Microscopic dynamic traffic management: Simulation of two typical situations. 14th IEEE international intelligent transportation systems conference, ITSC, Washington, DC, USA (pp. 1898–1903).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baselt, D., Knorr, F., Scheurmann, B., Schreckenberg, M., Mauve, M., 2014. Merging lanes-fairness through communication. Elsevier Vehicular Communications Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2014, (pp. 97–104).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Letter, C. and L. Elefteriadou. Efficient Control of Fully Automated Connected Vehicles at Freeway Merge Segments. Transportation Research Part C, Volume 80, July 2017, pp. 190–205.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ehsan Amini, Aschkan Omidvar, Lily Elefteriadou. Optimizing Operations at Freeway Weaves with Connected and Automated Vehicles. Submitted for presentation to the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, August 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ehsan Amini, Lily Elefteriadou. Optimal traffic management for CAVs for multilane freeway weaves, Submitted for publication to Transp. Res. Part B, January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ragunathan (Raj) Rajkumar, Insup Lee, Lui Sha, John Stankovic, Cyber-Physical Systems: The Next Computing Revolution, Design Automation Conference 2010, Anaheim, California, USA, June 2010. (https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837461).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Problems

Problems

  1. 1.

    Conduct a literature review regarding advanced traffic management for freeway systems. What types of strategies are available internationally? Are there specific guidelines for implementing a specific strategy under specific conditions?

  2. 2.

    Conduct a literature review to document the interactions between VSL, ramp metering, and HOV/HOT lanes.

  3. 3.

    Conduct a literature review to identify simulation packages that evaluate freeway systems. Document the way each simulator replicates the network, merging operations, and upgrade sections. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach?

  4. 4.

    A freeway merge section has three lanes of traffic along the mainline with a demand equal to 5200 vph. The ramp has one lane and a demand equal to 750 vph. There are 10% trucks in the traffic stream, and the free-flow speed is 65 mph. The terrain is level. Conduct an HCM 2010 analysis to determine the LOS at this section. Also, use your favorite microsimulator package to replicate the same facility. What is the LOS estimated by this microsimulator?

  5. 5.

    Estimate the operating speed of a freeway with the following characteristics: three lanes per direction, a free-flow speed of 68 mph, a peak hour demand of 6350 vph, and 5% trucks with a PCE of 2.0. What is the LOS of the facility and what is its capacity? Is capacity exceeded during the peak hour? Clearly state any assumptions necessary for solving the problem. (To solve this problem, use Chap. 11 of the HCM 2010.)

  6. 6.

    Review the state of the art in the development and deployment of CAVs. How has the field changed relative to the challenges outlined in the last section of this chapter?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elefteriadou, L. (2024). Freeways. In: An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54030-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics