Skip to main content

Measuring Mobility: Quality, Quantity, Utilization, and Accessibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 84))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

The previous two chapters discussed the fundamental traffic stream parameters and capacity, which provided the fundamental components for understanding traffic stream performance and for developing models to replicate the operations of traffic streams. For practitioners and policymakers, it is most important to be able to use valid traffic flow models to extract suitable performance measures. Such performance measures are used to evaluate traffic operational performance and select the best alternative for implementation. Therefore, they play a very important role in selecting the projects to be deployed. But what are these performance measures and how should we select the most suitable one(s) for a given situation?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FDOT Mobility Measures Program, Florida Department of Transportation, Consensus Items, April 2018 https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/planning/fto/mobility/consensus.pdf

  2. Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington DC, 2022

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akçelik, R. (1991). Travel time functions for transport planning purposes: Davidson’s function, its time-dependent form and an alternative travel time function. Australian Road Research, 21(3), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chrysikopoulos, G. (2010). Freeway travel time estimation as a function of demand. Master’s Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ebeling, C.E., “Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering”, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. www.transtats.bts.gov/HomeDrillChart.asp, accessed May 5, 2022.

  7. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Third Edition (2013) ISBN 978-0-309-28344-1, https://doi.org/10.17226/24766

  8. Implementing the Results of the Second Strategic Highway Research Program: Saving Lives, Reducing Congestion, Improving Quality of Life, TRB Special Report 296, 2009, ISBN 978-0-309-12606-9 https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr296.pdf

  9. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/statistics/symposium/2014/Fl-natlPerformData.pdf, accessed May 5, 2022

  10. Lomax, T., D. Schrank, S. Turner. Selecting Travel Time Reliability Measures. Texas A&M University, 2003. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/TTI-2003-3.pdf

  11. Kothuri, S.M., Tufte, K.A., Ahn, S. and Bertini, R.L., Using Archived ITS Data to Generate Improved Travel Time Estimates. Proceedings of the 86th annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC., Jan. 21–25, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  12. Highway Capacity Manual 2000, (Chapter 16, Appendix A), Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dowling, R.G., D. B. Reinke, A. Flannery, P. Ryus, M. Vandehey, T. A. Petrisch, B. W. Landis, N.M. Rouphail, and J. A. Bonneson, NCHRP Report 616: Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Committee of the Transport Access Manual, Transport Access Manual: A Guide for Measuring Connection Between People and Places, 2020. https://transportist.org/transport-access-manual-a-guide-for-measuring-connection-between-people-and-places/ accessed May 6, 2022.

  15. Beverly Foundation. (2010). The 5 A’s of Senior-Friendly Transportation. Albuquerque, NM: The Beverly Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elefteriadou, L., S. Classen, P. Manjunatha, S. Srinivasan, R. Steiner, I. Bejleri, M. Mohebbi, X. Yan, S. Patni, L. Kibet, M. Jeghers. Transportation Mobility Assessment and Recommendations for Smart City Planning, FDOT Final Report, October 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cambridge Systematic, Inc., Dowling & Associates, Inc., System Metrics Group, Inc., and Texas Transportation Institute. Cost-Effective Performance Measures for Travel Time Delay, Variation, and Reliability. NCHRP Report 618, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zietsman, J. and Ramani, T. (2011). Sustainability Performance Measures for State DOTs and Other Transportation Agencies. NCHRP Project No. 08-74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Problems

Problems

  1. 1.

    Use the HCM7 speed–flow–density curves to estimate the travel time for noncongested conditions. Produce a graph showing travel time as a function of demand for a freeway segment with an FFS of 70 mph.

  2. 2.

    Use Akcelik’s formula [3] to predict the travel time and plot travel time vs demand.

  3. 3.

    A set of travel time data has been collected for a year during the evening peak (4–6 pm) along a freeway route and is provided below. The route length is 3 miles, and the speed limit along this facility is 65 mph. What is the reliability of the facility if on-time arrivals occur for speeds of at least 50 mph? What is the travel time index and buffer time index? What can you conclude about the operations of this facility during the evening peak hour?

Travel time (s)

Frequency

≤150

2

(150–180)

139

(180–210)

226

(210–240)

167

(240–270)

93

(270–300)

65

(300–330)

25

(330–360)

8

>360

5

  1. 4.

    Select a traffic microsimulator and determine how it defines the average travel time, delay, and queue length. What time and space boundaries does it use to define these measures?

  2. 5.

    Conduct a literature review to find the performance measurement framework used in your city, state, or country to evaluate freeways and arterials. What are the primary measures used for each dimension? Does this framework consider all four dimensions of mobility?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elefteriadou, L. (2024). Measuring Mobility: Quality, Quantity, Utilization, and Accessibility. In: An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54030-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics