Skip to main content

“Tell Everyone”: Abjection and Social Justice in Candyman (2021)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture Wars and Horror Movies

Abstract

This chapter explores abjection in its sociological sense in the movie Candyman (Nia Da Costa 2021). In the field of the social sciences, “abjection” describes a state of exclusion and marginalization (Bataille, Abjection and Miserable Forms. In More and Less, ed. Yvonne Shaffir, 9–13. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1934; McClintock, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge, 1995; Tyler, Revolting Subjects. London: Zed Books, 2013). In contrast, from the publication of Barbara Creed’s The Monstrous-Feminine (2009), in film studies, abjection has been interpreted from a psychoanalytical perspective as a primal rejection of the mother. Yet, social theories have never been used to explore abjection in horror movies.

The chapter begins by exploring the concept of abjection in both horror cinema studies and the social sciences. The analysis of the film is structured into three sections. The first one explores the gentrified ghetto as an abject space of systemic violence and discrimination. The second section explores abjection in relation to the demands of Black masculinity. The third interprets storytelling as a means of resistance against social abjection in the times of the #BlackLivesMatter movement.

In the movie, abjection is the result of spatial violence and racial stereotyping. Yet, Candyman as a monster haunts society and ensures that the stories of the marginalized are heard. As will be argued, in Candyman, the urban legend becomes a way of fighting back and ensuring social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter was written as part of the research conducted for the Grant PID2021-123836NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and co-funded by the European Union, the Grant CPH_01_22 funded by Departamento de Ciencia, Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, Gobierno de Aragón, and the Grant H23_20R funded by Departamento de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Gobierno de Aragón.  I would also like to thank Marimar Azcona for her feedback on earlier versions of this chapter. 

References

  • Aldana Reyes, Xavier. 2016. Horror Film and Affect. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, Georges. [1934] 2006. Abjection and Miserable Forms. In More and Less, ed. Yvonne Shaffir, 9–13. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2004. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlatsky, Noah. 2016. Fecund Horror: Slashers, Rape Revenge, Women in Prison, Zombies and Other Exploitation Dreck. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2011. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, Barbara. 1993. The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaCosta, Nia, dir. 2021. Candyman. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, Mikal J. 2020. They are Still Here: Possession and Dispossession in the 21st Century Haunted House Film. In The Spaces and Places of Horror, ed. Francesco Pascuzzi and Sandra Waters, 179–202. Delaware: Vernon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Erin. 2017. Women, Monstrosity and Horror Film: Gynaehorror. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hennefeld, Maggie, and Nicholas Sammond. 2020. Abjection Incorporated: Mediating the Politics of Pleasure and Violence. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, Tobe, dir. 1982. Poltergeist. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Chris. 2010. Global Cities. In The Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies, ed. Bryan S. Turner, 429–446. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotringer, Sylvère. 2020. The Politics of Abjection. In Abjection Incorporated, ed. Maggie Hennefeld and Nicholas Sammond, 30–39. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougal, Serie, III. 2020. Black Men’s Studies. Black Manhood and Masculinities in the U.S. Context. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means Coleman, Robin R. 2011. Horror Noire: Blacks in American Horror Films from the 1890s to Present. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuf, Russell. 2022. White Terror: The Horror Film from Obama to Trump. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, Daniel, and Eduardo Sánchez, dirs. 1999. The Blair Witch Project. Artisan Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peli, Oren, dir. 2007. Paranormal Activity. Blumhouse Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisters, Patricia. 2020. New Blood in Contemporary Cinema: Women Directors and the Poetics of Horror. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Bernard, dir. 1992. Candyman. TriStar Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Stuart, dir. 1979. The Amityville Horror. American International Productions and Cinema 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2003. Reading the City in a Global Digital Age: Between Topographic Representation and Spatialized Power Projects. In Global Cities: Cinema, Architecture, and Urbanism in a Digital Age, ed. Linda Krause and Patrice Petro, 15–30. New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabazz, Rashad. 2015. Spatializing Blackness: Architectures of Confinement and Black Masculinity in Chicago. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. 2016. From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Imogen. 2013. Revolting Subjects. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verbinski, Gore, dir. 2002. The Ring. Ring Distributor, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, James, dir. 2013. The Conjuring. Warner Bros, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Sylvain, dir. 2018. Slender Man. Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Linda. 2015. When the Woman Looks. In The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film, ed. Barry Keith Grant, 17–36. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Santamaría Ibor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Santamaría Ibor, V. (2024). “Tell Everyone”: Abjection and Social Justice in Candyman (2021). In: Gregorio-Fernández, N., M. Méndez-García, C. (eds) Culture Wars and Horror Movies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53836-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics