Skip to main content

Black Bodies/White Spaces: The Horrors of White Supremacy in Get Out (2017)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture Wars and Horror Movies
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

Since Get Out came out in May 2017, it has been widely received as “political horror” for its strong commentary on race relations in the United States. The starting point for Peele’s exploration of race in the United States was the way the racialized structures of social environments produced and organized unequal race relations. This structural perspective on race allows Get Out to raise political questions that deeply resonated with the dominant concerns of the movement for racial justice at the time of its release. But the film is also political in the way that it uses its status as a cultural object to question and reshape the racialization of US cultural space. In this chapter, I focus on three aspects of the racial politics of Get Out: how the film exposes the past and present objectification and exploitation of Black bodies, how it ties such exploitation to the racialized power dynamics of social spaces in US society, and, finally, how Get Out seeks to rewrite the racial coordinates of US cultural history by reclaiming historically predominantly white cultural spaces—such as the horror genre—for Black narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “The relationship between place and race represents one of Get Out’s most notable thematic concerns” (Murphy 2002, 72).

  2. 2.

    In his analysis of the horror film, Robin Wood identifies the “true subject of the horror genre [as] the struggle for recognition of all that our civilization represses or oppresses” and sums up the formula of the genre as “normality is threatened by the Monster.” In Wood’s view, the genre is structured around the binary opposition of us versus the repressed/oppressed Other, the Other taking on various features of gender, racial, sexual, class, cultural, age difference (Wood 2003, 68;71).

  3. 3.

    Building on the influence of Ira Levin, the author of Rosemary’s Baby and The Stepford Wives, on the horror genre and Get Out, Adam Lowenstein argues that Get Out finds its source within the horror genre rather than disrupts it, building on the genre’s power “as a vocabulary for the illumination, not the demonization, of the pain endured by social minorities” (Lowenstein 2020, 102). In her introduction to the same collection, Dawn Keetley also notes that “while Rosemary’s Baby, Stepford Wives, and Night of the Living Dead feature, respectively, demonic entities, animatronic doubles, and cannibalistic ghouls, they simultaneously represent societal structures—whether it be patriarchy or racism—as the monster. Indeed, characters in Rosemary’s Baby, Stepford Wives, Night of the Living Dead, and Get Out live in constant fear—and constant, vigilant watchfulness—because of those social structures, even as that same society tries to tell them they are paranoid for doing so” (Keetley 2020a, 4).

  4. 4.

    During the Blaxploitation of the early 1970s with films such as Ganja & Hess (Bill Gunn 1973) and in the early 1990s with films like Candyman (Bernard Rose 1992) and Tales from the Hood (Rusty Cundieff 1995).

  5. 5.

    For a sociological perspective on the question, see Massey and Tannen (2018).

  6. 6.

    “The song, which contains the lyrics ‘run far away’ and ‘save yourself’ …, signals both to Chris and to informed viewers that Swahili possesses social power and that his cultural heritage may protect him from threats within his current environment” (Ryan-Bryant 2020, 98).

  7. 7.

    Here, Kyle Brett convincingly argues that Chris’s photographic eye does not so much seek to celebrate its human subjects as it decenters and dehumanizes them—the dog owner and pregnant woman have their faces cut out-of-frame, the balloon holder competes for attention with his balloons’ shadow on the wall. Chris’s photographic pursuits, while a celebration of African American artistic talents, also reproduce the objectifying violence that Chris himself will be subjected to and comment negatively on the ability of an institutional form of art, sought after by gallery owners such as Jim Hudson (Steven Root) who buys Chris for his “eye,” to bring about emancipation. Grace instead comes from a much more democratic form of art in the shape of a smartphone camera flash that briefly frees the victims of the Armitage from their enslavement (Brett 2020).

  8. 8.

    “By offering a multicultural résumé—‘I voted for Obama,’ and ‘some of my best friends are black’—white people attempt individually to excuse themselves from the functioning of a racist society. Such microinvalidations allow white liberals to feel comparatively superior and, crucially, to do nothing, as they are not figured as part of the problem. This means that a more insidious systemic racism is allowed to proceed unchecked” (Ilott 2020, 115).

  9. 9.

    Barker argues that this type of stalking camera places viewers in the position of the stalker even as they elicit dread that the character will be assaulted, investing viewers’ bodies in the film’s “gesture.” Such camerawork was also adopted in Halloween, whose introductory sequence famously adopts, and abandons, the killer’s perspective.

  10. 10.

    “The other black people in the Armitage household do not talk, dress, and act like Chris and cannot understand him: Walter, Georgina, and Logan are racially uncanny. While Logan is literally familiar (Chris knew Logan as Andre), all three characters are repressed—enslaved and marginalized within their own bodies by a white consciousness” (Casey-Williams 2020, 66).

  11. 11.

    An alternate ending available in the DVD bonus material shows the police arriving on the scene instead of Rod and Chris talking to Rod in jail. But test screenings and Trump’s election forced Peele to adopt a more cathartic tone (Nigatu and Clayton 2017).

References

  • Abela, Michael. 2017. Skilizam Kwa Wahenga. Get Out Soundtrack, Back Lot Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Sam. 2017. In Jordan Peele ’s Horror Movie, Get Out, the “Monster” is Liberal Racism. Slate, January 27. https://slate.com/culture/2017/01/at-sundance-jordan-peele-explains-how-obama-s-election-inspired-his-horror-movie-get-out.html.

  • Barker, Jennifer. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, Kyle. 2020. The Horror of the Photographic Eye. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 187–199. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey-Williams, Erin. 2020. Get Out and the Zombie Film. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 63–71. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citizen, Robyn. 2020. The Body Horror of White Second Chances in John Frankenheimer’s Seconds and Jordan Peele’s Get Out. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 87–100. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundieff, Rusty, dir. 1995. Tales from the Hood. Savoy Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Bryan, dir. 1975. The Stepford Wives. Columbia Pictures

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino, Childish. 2016. Redbone. Awaken, My Love. Glassnote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, Bill, dir. 1973. Ganja & Hess. Kelly-Jordan Enterprises

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilott, Sarah. 2020. Racism That Grins: African American Gothic Realism and Systemic Critique. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 114–130. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keetley, Dawn, ed. 2020a. Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020b. Get Out: Political Horror. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 1–22. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kubrick, Stanley, dir. 1980. The Shining. Warner Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, Adam. 2020. Jordan Peele and Ira Levin Go to the Movies: The Black/Jewish Genealogy of Modern Horror’s Minority Vocabulary. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 101–113. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas S., and Jonathan Tannen. 2018. Suburbanization and Segregation in the United States: 1970–2010. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (9): 1594–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means Coleman, Robin R., and Novotny Lawrence. 2020. A Peaceful Place Denied: Horror Film’s “Whitopias”. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 47–62. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Omar P. L. 2017. Do the White Thing. Popcorn Reel, March 7. http://www.popcornreel.com/htm/getoutessay.html.

  • Murphy, Bernice M. 2020. Place, Space, and the Reconfiguration of “White Trash” Monstrosity. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 72–86. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigatu, Heben, and Tracy Clayton. 2017. Incognegro. Another Round 83, March 1. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-83-incognegro-with-jordan-peele/id977676980?i=1000382040164.

  • Peele, Jordan, dir. 2017. Get Out. California: Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, Todd K., and David L. Brunsma. 2020. Reviewing Get Out ‘s Reviews: What Critics Said and How their Race Mattered. In Jordan Peele’s Get Out: Political Horror, ed. Dawn Keetley, 131–146. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanski, Roman, dir. 1968. Rosemary’s Baby. Paramount Pictures

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, George, dir. 1968. Night of the Living Dead. Image Ten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Bernard, dir. 1992. Candyman. TriStar Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Bryant, Jennifer. 2020. The Cinematic Rhetorics of Lynching in Jordan Peele’s Get Out. Journal of Popular Culture 53 (1): 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, Christine. 2017. Get Out Movie Controversy? Film Called “Anti-White” and “Racist” by Some Viewers. Mic, February 24. https://www.mic.com/articles/169514/get-out-movie-controversy-film-called-anti-white-and-racist-by-some-viewers.

  • Sublette, Cammie M. 2020. Post-Racial Lies and Fear of the Historical-Political Boomerang in Jordan Peele’s Get Out and Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad. In The Politics of Horror, ed. Damien K. Picariello, 233–246. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wisecrack. 2018. Get Out (Directed by Jordan Peele)—Exploring the Sunken Place. Show Me the Meaning!—A Wisecrack Movie Podcast, February 9. https://www.wisecrack.co/show-me-the-meaning-movie-podcast/episode/cc007609/get-out-directed-by-jordan-peele-exploring-the-sunken-place.

  • Wood, Robin. 2003. Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan… and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinoman, Jason. 2017. Jordan Peele on a Truly Terrifying Monster: Racism. New York Times, February 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/movies/jordan-peele-interview-get-out.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Mayer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayer, H. (2024). Black Bodies/White Spaces: The Horrors of White Supremacy in Get Out (2017). In: Gregorio-Fernández, N., M. Méndez-García, C. (eds) Culture Wars and Horror Movies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53836-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics