Skip to main content

Space Exploration Perception—Current and Future Research Directions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Selected Proceedings of the 6th Space Resources Conference (SRC 2023)

Part of the book series: Springer Aerospace Technology ((SAT))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

Space exploration evokes different connotations in different people. For some, it represents human progress and the eternal quest for answers to the most profound questions like “When did the Universe originate?” or “Are we alone in the Universe?”. For others, space exploration is yet another way to exhibit national domination, gain superiority and affluence. As with the development of many new technologies it is not possible to unequivocally determine whether it is good or bad, beneficial or detrimental. Space exploration has its indisputable scientific and pragmatic benefits. But it also can pose threats and lead to abuse or misuse of power or resources. It is therefore important to monitor how society perceives this domain, especially in the moments of its rapid development such as we witness nowadays. Currently both public and private space sectors are developing rapidly. New ambitious missions are being planned and implemented including commercial enterprises worldwide to join in. How people perceive space exploration influences both their own engagement in this subject (for example in terms of educational and vocational choices) but also affect policy makers and public funding strategies. In this article we present an outline of research areas in space exploration perception. We summarize key previous findings and propose an outline for future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abd Majid R, Abdullah M, Bais B, Hasbi AM, Bahri NS, Bahari SA, Mokhtar MH (2015). Malaysian students' perception and attitude towards space science: a pilot study. In 2015 International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace) (pp. 297–301). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andries A, Murphy RJ, Morse S, Lynch J (2021) Earth observation for monitoring, reporting, and verification within environmental land management policy. Sustainability 13(16):9105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergstrom Z, Sadler P, Sonnert G (2016) Evolution and persistence of students’ astronomy career interests: a gender study. J Astron Earth Sci Educ (JAESE) 3(1):77–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burbach DT (2019) Partisan rationales for space: motivations for public support of space exploration funding, 1973–2016. Space Policy 50:101331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calzada-Diaz A, Dayas-Codina M, MacArthur JL, Bielicki DM (2014) Role of the current young generation within the space exploration sector. Space Policy 30(3):178–182

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb WNW (2011) Who’s supporting space activities? An ‘issue public for US space policy. Space Policy 27(4):234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook SB, Druger M, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2011) Scientific literacy and attitudes towards American space exploration among college undergraduates. Space Policy 27(1):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeWitt J, Bultitude K (2020) Space science: the view from European school students. Res Sci Educ 50(5):1943–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Detsis B, Detsis E (2013) The benefits brought by space—general public versus space agencies perspectives. Acta Astronautica 88:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrenfreund P, Peter N, Schrogl KU, Logsdon JM (2010) Cross-cultural management supporting global space exploration. Acta Astronaut 66(1–2):245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Entradas M, Miller S, Peters HP (2013) Preaching to the converted? An analysis of the UK public for space exploration. Public Underst Sci 22(3):269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Entradas M, Miller S, Peters HP (2013) Preaching to the converted? an analysis of the UK public for space exploration. Public Understanding of Sci 22(3):269–286

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Space Agency (2018) Europeans and space activities, Harris Interactive. https://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/corporate/European_and_space_activities_Harris_results.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2023

  14. Finarelli P, Pryke I (2007) Building and maintaining the constituency for long-term space exploration. Space Policy 23(1):13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Funk C, Strauss M (2018) Majority of Americans believe it is essential that the US remain a global leader in space. Pew Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gallup (2019) https://news.gallup.com/poll/260309/years-moon-landing-support-space-program-high.aspx. Accessed 10 July 2023

  17. Haklay MM, Dörler D, Heigl F, Manzoni M, Hecker S, Vohland K (2021) What is citizen science? The challenges of definition. The science of citizen science, 13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalmbach JA, Ralston JJ (2021) Sights on mars: continuity and change in support for space policy. Space Policy 57:101446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Launius RD (2003) Public opinion polls and perceptions of US human spaceflight. Space policy 19(3):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKinsey & Company (2022) The role of space in driving sustainability, security, and development on Earth. Accessed 20 July 2023

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nadeau F (2013) Explaining public support for space exploration funding in America: a multivariate analysis. Acta Astronaut 86:158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ottavianelli G, Good M (2002) Space education: a step forward. Space Policy 18(2):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Planet Partners (2023) Analysis of the IT field in the Polish space sector, https://planetpartners.pl/reports/analiza-obszaru-it-w-polskim-sektorze-kosmicznym/. Accessed 20 July 2023

  24. Platt CA, Jason M, Sullivan CJ (2020) Public perceptions of private space initiatives: how young adults view the spaceX plan to colonize mars. Space Policy 51:101358

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pyrkosz-Pacyna J, Cieślak K, Zwierżdżyński MK (2022) Space exploration perception and engagement intention among STEM university students-results from a mixed method study. New Educ Review 69:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reddy MV, Nica M, Wilkes K (2012) Space tourism: research recommendations for the future of the industry and perspectives of potential participants. Tourism Manag 33(5):1093–1102

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steinberg A (2013) Influencing public opinion of space policy: programmatic effects versus education effects. Astropolitics 11(3):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Toivonen A (2022) Sustainability dimensions in space tourism: the case of Finland. J Sustainable Tourism 30(9):2223–2239

    Google Scholar 

  29. United Nations (2018) European global navigation satellite system and Copernicus: supporting the sustainable Development Goals report, https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2018/stspace/stspace71_0_html/st_space_71E.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2023

  30. Vaughan D (1996) The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Cieślak, K. (2024). Space Exploration Perception—Current and Future Research Directions. In: Kołodziejczyk, A., Pyrkosz–Pacyna, J., Grabowski, K., Malinowska, K., Sergijenko, O. (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 6th Space Resources Conference. SRC 2023. Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53610-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53610-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53610-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics