Abstract
This chapter explores the patterns of return migration from Europe to Turkey on the times of crises by means of a qualitative micro study. It provides descriptive data on push/pull factors affecting Turkish migrants and their future migratory plans. In addition to the recent global pandemic (COVID-19), Turkey has been going through severe economic crises and hyperinflations recently. Collecting data from nine return migrants who returned to Turkey recently and conducting semi-structured in-depth interviews, push and pull factors affecting their return decision, their reintegration processes amid the public health and economic crises, and the role of family dynamics in return migration process were investigated. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analyses. Findings suggest that emotional reasons outweigh all the economic and Covid considerations in return migration decision and reintegration processes. Although hyperinflation and unemployment challenge the lives of returnees, emotional reasons like keeping ethnic ties, feeling home, and avoiding discriminating context in Europe convinced the returnees to stay in Turkey. The results of the study were discussed within acculturation theory, family research, and crisis perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abadan-Unat, N. (2006). Bitmeyen Göç: Konuk İşçilikten Ulus-ötesi Yurttaşlığa [Never ending migration: From guestworkers to transnational citizens]. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Apsite-Berina, E., Manea, M. E., & Berzins, M. (2020). The ambiguity of return migration: Prolonged crisis and uncertainty in the life strategies of young Romanian and Latvian returnees. International Migration, 58(1), 61–75.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997
Bolognani, M. (2007). The myth of return: dismissal, survival or revival? A Bradford example of transnationalism as a political instrument. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), 59–76.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF). (2016). Migrationsbericht 2015. Nuremberg: BAMF.
Christou, A., & King, R. (2006). Migrants encounter migrants in the city: The Changing context of ‘home’ for second-generation Greek American return migrants. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 816–835.
Dona, G., & Ackermann, L. (2006). Refugees in camps. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 218–232). Cambridge University Press.
Dustmann, C., & Weiss, Y. (2007). Return migration: Theory and empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2), 236–256.
He, Q., & Gerber, T. P. (2020). Origin-country culture, migration sequencing, and female employment: Variations among immigrant women in the United States. International Migration Review, 54(1), 233–261.
Hofmann, E. T., & Buckley, C. J. (2013). Global changes and gendered responses: The feminization of migration from Georgia. International Migration Review, 47(3), 508–538.
İçduygu, A. (2012). 50 years after the labour recruitment agreement with Germany: The consequences of emigration for Turkey. Perceptions, 17, 11–36. Retrieved from: http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ahmet_icduygu.pdf
Kaya, A., & Kentel, F. (2008). Belçika Türkleri: Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği arasında bir engel mi? [Euro-Turks: A bridge, or a breach, between Turkey and the European Union?]. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Kılıç, Z., & Menjívar, C. (2013). Fluid adaptation of contested citizenship: Second-generation migrant Turks in Germany and the United States. Social Identities, 19, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2013.789217
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Sage.
King, R. (2018). Theorising new European youth mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 24(1), e2117.
King, R., & Christou, A. (2011). Of counter-diaspora and reverse transnationalism: Return mobilities to and from the ancestral homeland. Mobilities, 6(4), 451–466.
King, R., Christou, A., & Ahrens, J. (2011). ‘Diverse mobilities’: Second generation Greek-Germans engage with homeland as children and as adults. Mobilities, 6(4), 483–501.
Konzett-Smoliner, S. (2016). Return migration as a ‘family project’: Exploring the relationship between family life and the readjustment experiences of highly skilled Austrians. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1094–1114.
Kunuroglu, F., Yagmur, K., Van de Vijver, F. J., & Kroon, S. (2015). Consequences of Turkish return migration from Western Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 198–211.
Kunuroglu, F., Yagmur, K., Van De Vijver, F. J., & Kroon, S. (2018). Motives for Turkish return migration from Western Europe: Home, sense of belonging, discrimination and transnationalism. Turkish Studies, 19(3), 422–450.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 431–466.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., & Pellegrino, A. (1999). Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Clarendon Press.
Nguyen, A.-M. D., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2012). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–159.
Ní Laoire, C. (2008). Complicating host-newcomer dualisms: Irish return migrants as home-comers or newcomers. Translocations: Migration and Social Change, 4(1), 35–50.
Phalet, K., & Güngör, D. (2009). Cultural continuity and discontinuity in Turkish migrant families: Extending the model of family change. In S. Bekman & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Perspectives on human development, family, and culture (pp. 241–262). Cambridge University Press.
Ralph, D. (2012). Managing sameness and difference: The politics of belonging among Irish-born return migrants from the United States. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(5), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.698747
Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. H. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330
Reynolds, T. (2010). Transnational family relationships, social networks and return migration among British-Caribbean young people. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(5), 797–815.
Searle, W., & Ward, C. (1990). The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(90)90030-Z
Sussman, N. M. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(4), 355–373.
Tezcan, T. (2022). Return migration intentions driven by parental concerns and the value of children. Sociological Forum, 38(1), 121–143.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148.
Tsuda, T. (2009). Why does the diaspora return home? The causes of ethnic return migration. In T. Tsuda (Eds.), Diasporic homecomings: Ethnic return migration in comparative perspective (pp. 21–43). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
TUSIAD (Turk Sanayicileri ve Isadamlari Dernegi). (2006). Türkiye- Avrupa Birliği ilişkileri bağlamında göç tartışmaları. İstanbul.
Virta, E., Sam, D. L., & Westin, C. (2004). Adolescents with Turkish background in Norway and Sweden: A comparative study of their psychological adaptation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 15–25.
Vlase, I. (2013). ‘My husband is a patriot!’: Gender and Romanian family return migration from Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(5), 741–758.
Ward, C., & Geeraert, N. (2016). Advancing acculturation theory and research: The acculturation process in its ecological context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 98–104.
Yehuda-Sternfeld, S. B., & Mirsky, J. (2014). Return migration of Americans: Personal narratives and psychological perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 42, 53–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kunuroglu, F., Yüzbaşı, D.V. (2024). Family Return Migration from Europe to Turkey in the Time of Crises. In: Yeo, J. (eds) Return Migration and Crises in Non-Western Countries. Mobility & Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53562-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53562-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53561-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53562-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)