Skip to main content

Filtering Communities in Word Co-Occurrence Networks to Foster the Emergence of Meaning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks & Their Applications XII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1141))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1003 Accesses

Abstract

With SINr, we introduced a way to design graph and word embeddings based on community detection. Contrary to deep learning approaches, this approach does not require much compute and was proven to be at the state-of-the-art for interpretability in the context of word embeddings. In this paper, we investigate how filtering communities detected on word co-occurrence networks can improve performances of the approach. Community detection algorithms tend to uncover communities whose size follows a power-law distribution. Naturally, the number of activations per dimensions in SINr follows a power-law: a few dimensions are activated by many words, and many dimensions are activated by a few words. By filtering this distribution, removing part of its head and tail, we show improvement on intrinsic evaluation of the embedding while dividing their dimensionality by five. In addition, we show that these results are stable through several runs, thus defining a subset of distinctive features to describe a given corpus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamic, L.: Unzipping Zipf’s law. Nature 474(7350), 164–165 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agirre,E., Alfonseca,E., Hall,K., Kravalova, J., Paşca, M.: A study on similarity and relatedness using distributional and WordNet-based approaches. In: NAACL, pp. 19–27, (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baroni, M.: 39 distributions in text. In: Corpus Linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2, pp. 803–822. Mouton de Gruyter (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E.: The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Lang. Resour. Eval. 43(3), 209–226 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume,J.-L., Lambiotte,R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp., p. P10008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruni, E., Tran, N.K., Baroni, M.: Multimodal distributional semantics. J. Artif. Int. Res. 49(1), 1–47 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. BNC Consortium. British national corpus, XML edition (2007). Oxford Text Archive

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dao, V.L., Bothorel, C., Lenca, P.: Community structure: a comparative evaluation of community detection methods. Netw. Sci. 8(1), 1–41 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dugué, Nicolas, Lamirel, Jean-Charles., Perez, Anthony: Bringing a feature selection metric from machine learning to complex networks. In: Aiello, Luca Maria, Cherifi, Chantal, Cherifi, Hocine, Lambiotte, Renaud, Lió, Pietro, Rocha, Luis M.. (eds.) COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. SCI, vol. 813, pp. 107–118. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05414-4_9

  10. Guillot, S., Prouteau, T., Dugué, N.: Sparser is better: one step closer to word embedding interpretability. In: International Workshop on Computational Semantics (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hill, F., Reichart, R., Korhonen, A.: SimLex-999: evaluating semantic models with (genuine) similarity estimation. CoRR, abs/1408.3456 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, E., Socher, R., Manning, C., Ng, A.: Improving word representations via global context and multiple word prototypes. In: ACL, pp. 873–882 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lambiotte, R.: Multi-scale modularity and dynamics in complex networks. In: Mukherjee, A., Choudhury, M., Peruani, F., Ganguly, N., Mitra, B. (eds.) Dynamics On and Of Complex Networks, vol. 2, pp. 125–141. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6729-8_7

  14. Launay, J., et al.: PAGnol: an extra-large french generative model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08554 (2021)

  15. Levy, O., Goldberg, Y.: Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization. In: Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N., Weinberger, K.Q., (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27. Curran Associates, Inc. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, O., Goldberg, Y., Dagan, I.: Improving distributional similarity with lessons learned from word embeddings. ACL 3, 211–225 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Louis Martin, et al.: CamemBERT: a tasty French language model. arXiv:1911.03894 (2019)

  18. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: ICLR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Mitchell, T.: Learning effective and interpretable semantic models using non-negative sparse embedding. In: COLING, pp. 1933–1950 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: EMNLP, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prouteau, T., et al.: SINr: fast computing of sparse interpretable node representations is not a sin! In: Abreu, P.H., Rodrigues, P.P., Fernández, A., Gama, J. (eds.) IDA 2021. LNCS, vol. 12695, pp. 325–337. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74251-5_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Prouteau, T., Dugué, N., Camelin, N., Meignier, S.: Are embedding spaces interpretable? Results of an intrusion detection evaluation on a large French corpus. In: LREC (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanian, A., Pruthi, D., Jhamtani, H., Berg-Kirkpatrick, T., Hovy, E.: Spine: SParse interpretable neural embeddings. In: AAAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work has been funded by the ANR project DIGING (ANR-21-CE23-0010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Dugué .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Béranger, A., Dugué, N., Guillot, S., Prouteau, T. (2024). Filtering Communities in Word Co-Occurrence Networks to Foster the Emergence of Meaning. In: Cherifi, H., Rocha, L.M., Cherifi, C., Donduran, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications XII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1141. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53468-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53468-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53467-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53468-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics