Skip to main content

The First Period: 1949–1974

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parliamentary Representation of Political Minorities

Part of the book series: Comparative Studies of Political Agendas ((CSPA))

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 4 covers the first period of the Arab Palestinian legislators’ activities, 1949–1974 (the 1st Knesset through the 7th Knesset). The chapter illustrates that in the first decade of the newly born Jewish democratic country, the Arab Palestinian legislators who found themselves a minority had to fight for their national identity—Arab rather than Palestinian, and Israeli Arabs as part of the Arab world. In the second and the beginning of the third decades the Israeli government eliminated military rule over the Arab localities and came to rule over the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights. Within this context the political discourse changed to an emphasis on the second and third identities: religion and being Palestinian.

The chapter demonstrates that Arab Palestinian legislators have paid policy attention to all five of their identities in their parliamentary talks. Indeed, as research has established, the percentage of policy attention they allocated to these identities varied. However, in the first several decades of Israel, most of the Arab Palestinian legislators’ focus was on their identity as Arabs within Israel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The fedayeen were Palestinians who infiltrated Israel from Egypt and Jordan.

  2. 2.

    On the eve of Operation Kadesh, an Israeli border unit fired at Arab Palestinian citizens from Kafr Qassem who did not know that a curfew had been imposed on the village and all Arab villages. Those responsible were prosecuted and sentenced to long periods in prison, but their sentences were commuted, and they were released in 1960. For many years, this affair clouded Jewish-Arab relations in Israel.

  3. 3.

    For more information about the Six-Day War read https://embassies.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/history/Pages/The%20Six-Day%20War%20-%20June%201967.aspx; https://www.britannica.com/event/Six-Day-War.

  4. 4.

    For more information about the Yom Kippur War read. https://embassies.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/history/Pages/The%20Yom%20Kippur%20War%20-%20October%201973.aspx; https://www.britannica.com/event/Yom-Kippur-War.

  5. 5.

    The Reparations Agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany (“Reparations Agreement”) was signed on September 10, 1952. According to the agreement, West Germany was to pay Israel for the costs of “resettling so great a number of uprooted and destitute Jewish refugees” after the war, and to compensate individual Jews, via the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, for the Nazis’ seizure of Jewish property and their murder.

  6. 6.

    https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/subjects/Pages/%D7%90%D7%95%D7%9B%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94.aspx.

  7. 7.

    Political opposition to military rule came both from the Israeli Communist Party, which included Arab Palestinian and Jewish leftists, and from the right, especially from Menachem Begin, who stressed that the British Mandate had instituted emergency regulations that it used against Jews.

  8. 8.

    The Gaza Strip was under Egyptian rule between 1948 and October 1956, and between March 1957 and June 1967. Officially, the Strip was administered from September 1948 by the government of all Palestine. Although it was a symbolic move, the government was recognized by most members of the Arab Legion, and it managed the Gaza Strip until its dissolution by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1959. Egypt did not annex the Strip due to the dissolution of the government and its resulting military rule.

  9. 9.

    Between 1948 and 1967, Jordan ruled East Jerusalem and the territories of the West Bank, after conquering them at the end of the British Mandate. Earlier, this area was included in the Mandatory Land of Israel. During the War of Independence, the Jordanian army took control of these areas, and in 1950 Jordan annexed them. Britain, Iraq, Pakistan and other countries recognized the annexation, although there was opposition from Israel.

  10. 10.

    Mapam was a left-wing political party in Israel.

  11. 11.

    I chose to present the 23 subjects related to being an Arab within Israel for just a sample of legislators from the second Knesset term for three reasons. First, the trend is the same in all of the other Knesset terms in the first period. Second, the visualization of seven Knesset terms with 49 MKs creates an unreadable graph. Third, the sample of the legislators represents their variance in the parties to which they belonged—independent Arab parties, satellite parties and Zionist parties.

  12. 12.

    Zeedan (2019) defined a negative peace as the reduction, prevention or absence of war and violence. In contrast, a positive peace involves a sense of cooperation or integration.

  13. 13.

    A Christian legislator and member of the independent Communist Party.

  14. 14.

    A term used to describe the career duration of an individual legislator in parliament (e.g., Pilotti, 2015).

References

  • A’li, N. (2019). Palestinian citizens in Israel: A sociological portrait. In M. Haj-Yahia, I. Levav, & O. Nakash (Eds.), Health and mental health among Palestinians in Israel (pp. 70–96). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akirav, O. (2014). Catch-22: Arab members of the Israeli parliament. Representation, 50(4), 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akirav, O. (2018). Electoral rules and legislators’ productivity. Parliamentary Affairs., 0, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akirav, O. (2021). The agenda power of non-legislative tools. Israel Affairs., 27(2), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, N. (2022). The Ra’am Enigma and the religious gamble: An informed reading of the Palestinian Arab community or groping in the dark. Israel Studies, 27(2), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amara, M., & Schnell, I. (2004). Identity repertoires among Arabs in Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(1), 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amara, M., & Mustafa, M. (2013). The impact of the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip on the political discourse of the Palestinians in Israel. In D. E. Bar-Tal & I. E. Schnell (Eds.), The impacts of lasting occupation: Lessons from Israeli society (pp. 273–295). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailer, S., & Ohmura, T. (2017). Exploring, maintaining, and disengaging – The three phases of a legislator’s life. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 43(3), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, K. (2012). Toward an integrated perspective of minority representation: Views from Canada. Politics & Gender, 8(4), 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broockman, D. E. (2013). Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance blacks’ interests: A field experiment manipulating political incentives. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., & Banks, K. H. (2014). Black Women’s agenda setting in the Maryland state legislature. Journal of African American Studies, 18(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K., & Erzeel, S. (2015). Beyond the usual suspects: Non-left, male and non-Feminist MPs and the substantive representation of women. Government and Opposition, 50(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K., & Erzeel, S. (2017). The complementarity advantage: Parties, representativeness and newcomers’ access to power. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffé, H. (2018). MPs’ representational focus in MMP systems. A comparison between Germany and New Zealand. Representation, 54(4), 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, B. F., Escobar-Lemmon, M. C., Jones, B. S., Jones, M. P., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2009). The electoral connection and legislative committees. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Däubler, T. (2020). National policy for local reasons: How MPs represent party and geographical constituency through initiatives on social security. Acta Politica, 55(3), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diab, A. B., Shdema, I., & Schnell, I. (2022). Arab integration in new and established mixed cities in Israel. Urban Studies, 59(9), 1800–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissler, R., Green-Pedersen, C., Loftis, M. W., Mortensen, P. B., & Russell, A. (2022). The partisan context of parliamentary questions: A study of opposition behavior in the Danish parliament. Acta Politica, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, Y. (2020). Women MPs from Northern Ireland: Challenges and contributions, 1953–2020. Open Library of Humanities, 6(2), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, A. (2021). Arab political institutions in Israel – From the political crisis to the politics of faith? In R. Y. Hazan, A. Dowty, & M. Hofnung (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Israeli politics and society (pp. 395–412). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklai, O., & Rass, R. A. (2022). The fourth phase of Palestinian Arab politics in Israel: The centripetal turn. Israel Studies, 27(1), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halabi, R. (2014). Invention of a nation: The Druze in Israel. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halabi, Y. (2018). Minority politics and the social construction of hierarchy: The case of the Druze community. Nations and Nationalism, 24(4), 977–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, A. M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitman, G. (2018). The joint Arab list for the Knesset: United, shared or split? Middle East Policy, 25(4), 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehmann, D., & Nugent, M. (2022). Male MPs, electoral vulnerability and the substantive representation of women’s interests. European Journal of Political Research, 61(3), 762–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, M. R., & Schneider, M. C. (2018). Gender, race, and political ambition: How intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(2), 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun, M., & Ossa, J. P. (2013). Political inclusion of marginalized groups: Indigenous reservations and gender parity in Bolivia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. (2008). The political ethos of Palestinian citizens of Israel: Critical reading in the future vision documents. Israel Studies Review, 23(2), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. (2022). Descriptive over-representation, cliental accountability, and minority politics: The case of the Druze in Israel. Democratization, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M., & Sheldon, J. (2021). ‘A place apart’, or integral to ‘our precious Union’? Understanding the nature and implications of Conservative Party thinking about Northern Ireland, 2010–19. Irish Political Studies, 36(2), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolpinskaya, E. (2017). Substantive religious representation in the UK parliament: Examining parliamentary questions for written answers, 1997–2012. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., & Whitaker, R. (2019). Beyond committees: Parliamentary oversight of coalition government in Britain. West European Politics, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahern, U. (2012). Palestinian Christians in Israel: State attitudes towards non-Muslims in a Jewish State. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mjally-Knani, S., Sagy, S., Mana, A., & Srour, A. (2017). Socioeconomic status, intergroup daily contact and identity strategies: The case of Palestinian Muslim and Christians citizens of Israel. World, 4(1), 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mügge, L. M., & Erzeel, S. (2016). Double jeopardy or multiple advantage? Intersectionality and political representation. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mügge, L. M., van der Pas, D. J., & van de Wardt, M. (2019). Representing their own? Ethnic minority women in the Dutch Parliament. West European Politics, 42(4), 705–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2016). The political representation of ethnic minority women in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), 586–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, M. (2010). The Druze in Israel: Questions of identity, citizenship, and patriotism. The Middle East Journal, 64(4), 575–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, L. (2001). The Druze and the birth of Israel. In J. A. Clancy-Smith, I. Gershoni, & J. E. Tucker (Eds.), The war for Palestine: rewriting the history of 1948 (pp. 60–78). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotti, A. (2015). The historical changes and continuities of Swiss parliamentary recruitment. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(2), 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, B., Widner, K., & Harmon, R. (2019). Legislating at the intersections: Race, gender, and representation. Political Research Quarterly, 1065912919858405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekhess, E. (2014). The Arab minority in Israel: Reconsidering the “1948 Paradigm”. Israel Studies, 19(2), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, T., & Bischof, D. (2012). Minority-ethnic MPs and the substantive representation of minority interests in the House of Commons, 2005–2011. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(2), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotel, A. L. (2021). A Rainbow Bundestag? An intersectional analysis of LGBTI representation in Angela Merkel’s Germany. German Politics, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schueftan, D. (2011). Palestinians in Israel: The Arab minority and the Jewish State. Kinneret, Zmora-Bitan, Dvir – Publishing. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shdema, I. (2012). The role of socioeconomic factors in changing relations between Muslim and Christian Arabs in Israel between 1967 and 2010. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, K. (2018). Black faces in the mirror: African Americans and their representatives in the US Congress. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tzelgov, E. (2017). Coalition oversight and blame avoidance in Greece. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüst, A. M. (2014). A lasting impact? On the legislative activities of immigrant-origin parliamentarians in Germany. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeedan, R. (2019). The role of military service in the integration/segregation of Muslims, Christians and Druze within Israel. Societies, 9(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osnat Akirav .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akirav, O. (2024). The First Period: 1949–1974. In: Parliamentary Representation of Political Minorities. Comparative Studies of Political Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53250-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics