Skip to main content

China’s Rise in a Semi-peripheral Orbit (After WTO Entry)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crony Comprador Capitalism
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter traces China's trajectory of Ricardian export-led growth following its WTO accession. It explores the challenges posed by anti-developmental WTO rules to China's structural transformation, leading to a dilemma of “growth without development.” This predicament is influenced by China's crony comprador capitalist development, which places the country at risk of falling into a “middle-income trap” and sets limits on China's ongoing “peaceful rise.” These limitations become more pronounced with the emergence of great-power rivalries inherent in this semi-peripheral development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yue, J (2016), pp. 752–774.

  2. 2.

    Cheng, X (2003), pp. 25–46.

  3. 3.

    Segal, G (1999): “Does China Matter?” Foreign Affairs, 78:5, pp. 24–36.

  4. 4.

    Quah, D (2011): “The Global Economy’s Shifting Centre of Gravity.” Global Policy, 2:1, pp. 3–9.

  5. 5.

    Buzan, B (2010): “China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3:1, pp. 5–36.

  6. 6.

    Tony Blair: “We are now dealing not with a rising China but a risen China and this rise is both inevitable and right.” Reuters, 24/06/2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/U.S.-britain-blair-china-idUSKBN23V2OH.

  7. 7.

    Chinese economist Xiang Songzuo revealed China’s actual growth rate at just about 1.67%. He said: “according to the other calculation, the growth rate was negative,” far below the official figure of 6.6% in 2018. “Outspoken China economist casts doubt on growth forecast—Professor says contradictions in government statistics do not add up.” Nikkei Asia, 05/03/2019. https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Outspoken-China-economist-casts-doubt-on-growth-forecast; Eric Zhu and Tom Orlik wrote: “A study by economists at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and University of Chicago suggested that between 2010 and 2016, China’s ‘true’ GDP growth was about 1.8 percentage points below what the official data suggested. If China is in fact already on a slower growth path, overtaking the U.S. becomes harder.” News features on Bloomberg—“When Will China Rule the World? Maybe Never—The Communist Party wants the world to see China’s continued rise as inevitable. In reality, it’s anything but.” Bloomberg, 05/07/2021. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-07-05/when-will-china-s-economy-beat-the-u-s-to-become-no-1-why-it-may-never-happen.

  8. 8.

    Kitchen, N. & Cox, M. (2019): “Power, Structural Power, and American Decline.” Cambridge of International Affairs, 32:6, pp. 734–752.

  9. 9.

    Wallerstein, I, (1992): “The Concept of National Development.” The American Behavioral Scientist, 35:4, pp. 517–529.

  10. 10.

    2011 was the first time China set forth the timetable for industrialization at 2020. “Li calls for deeper trade ties with Germany.” The Financial Times, 07/01/2011. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d0244274-1a71-11e0-b003-00144feab49a.html#axzz1AXAIplJr; The State Council stated in the Notice on “Made in China 2025,” that “by 2020, China will basically achieve industrializationBy 2035, our country’s manufacturing as a whole will reach the medium level of the world’s manufacturing powers, and whereby to fully realize industrialization.” The State Council website, 08/05/2015. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm); Oddly, then Minister Miao Wei of MIIT (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology) was quoted by Xinhua as saying that “By 2025, with comprehensive index approaching that of Germany and Japan when they realized industrialization, China will basically achieve industrialization of our own and whereby to enter the second echelon of global manufacturing business.” Xinhuanet, 19/05/2015. http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2015-05/19/c_1115333559.htm; Miao Wei seemed to hint at a new timetable of achieving full industrialization at some three decades later (by 2050), far longer than the preset target of 2035. China Daily, 09/03/2021. (underlined and italics by the author).

  11. 11.

    Lou Jiwei, former Minister of Finance, issued warning that there was 50% chance for China to fall into the middle-income trap “in the coming 5 to 10 years.” RFI, 01/05/2015. https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD/20150501-%E8%B4%A2%E9%95%BF%E6%A5%BC%E7%BB%A7%E4%BC%9F%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E6%94%B6%E5%85%A5%E9%99%B7%E9%98%B1%E2%80%9D%E9%A3%8E%E9%99%A9%E8%AE%BA%E5%BC%95%E7%88%86%E6%94%BF%E7%BB%8F%E7%95%8C%E8%AE%A8%E8%AE%BA; Economist Xu Xiaonian argued that China had fallen into the middle-income trap. See Xu Xiaonian’s address delivered to the Shenzhen Institute of Innovation and Development dated 05/05/2017. https://xuxiaonian.blog.caixin.com/archives/162653; Both President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang expressed concern but optimism of transcending the “middle-income trap” by 2020, the symbol of which would be China’s per capita GDP surpassing US$12,000 (According to Li). China Economic Weekly, 25/07/2017. http://www.chinanews.com/cj/2017/07-25/8286488.shtml. China’s per capita GDP reached US$10,500 in 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CN.

  12. 12.

    Khan, S.R. & Christiansen, J (2011): Towards New Developmentalism—Markets are Means rather than Master. Routledge, pp. 177–202 & 257.

  13. 13.

    Stephen Roach (during China Development Forum in Beijing): “China: Straight Talk from Zhu.” 27/03/2002. www.morganstanley.com/GEFdata/digests/20020327-wed.html. This hyperlink no longer exists.

  14. 14.

    Chen, M and Yue, J (2002): “Exchange Market Share for Technology? An Analysis of China’s Strategy in Absorbing FDI.” Modern China Studies, No. 4, pp. 93–100.

  15. 15.

    “EMAT Faces Challenge, Core Technology still Depends on Indigenous Innovation.” Economic Reference News (jingji cankaobao), 30/11/2005; “Ten Big Debates in Economic Realms in 2005.” jingji cankao bao, 31/12/2005; “Liu Yanhua (Deputy Minister of Science and Technology): The introduction of technology is not equal to the introduction of innovation ability.” The Workers’ Daily, 01/12/2005.

  16. 16.

    Yue, J (2018), p. 86.

  17. 17.

    Wei Jinqiao: “A Failed ‘Market for Technology’ Strategy.” The Financial Times (Chinese version), 20/04/2011. http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001038180?full=y&archive.

  18. 18.

    Yue, J (2008): “Peaceful Rise of China: Myth or Reality?” International Politics, 6:1, pp. 439–456.

  19. 19.

    Rodrik, D (2011): The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States and Democracy can’t Coexist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 78.

  20. 20.

    Steinfeld, E (2010): Playing Our Game—Why China’s Rise Doesn’t Threaten the West. NY: Oxford University Press, p. 105.

  21. 21.

    Gilboy, G.J. (2004): “The Myth behind China’s Miracle.” Foreign Affairs, 83:4, July/Aug, pp. 33–48.

  22. 22.

    Dikötter, F (2022), p. 239.

  23. 23.

    China Business News (diyi caijing ribao, abbreviated as “yicai”), 28/11/2005.

  24. 24.

    21st Century Business Herald, 16/05/2004.

  25. 25.

    “2005 Multinational Corporations in China Report,” released by MOFCOM dated 26/01/2005.

  26. 26.

    “Is foreign capital really that important to us?” Shanghai Securities News, 27/02/2006. https://business.sohu.com/20060227/n242031085.shtml

  27. 27.

    Shi Weigan: “Re-examining the Role of FDI: of 28 Major Industries, 21 Controlled by the MNCs.” Nanfengchuang, 28/08/2006.

  28. 28.

    Dikötter, F (2022), pp. 254–255.

  29. 29.

    Yue, J (2018), p. 290.

  30. 30.

    Yue, J (2018), pp. 289–305.

  31. 31.

    For instance, Rachman, M. (2011): “Think again—This Time, It’s for Real.” Foreign Policy, 03/01/2011. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/01/03/think-again-american-decline/.

  32. 32.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 240.

  33. 33.

    Yue, J (2018), pp. 281–283.

  34. 34.

    Zhongguangwang, Beijing, 30/11/2009.

  35. 35.

    The People’s Daily, 01/03/2010.

  36. 36.

    The China Daily, 30/12/2010.

  37. 37.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 239.

  38. 38.

    Yue, J (2018), pp. 303–304; Yue, J (2022), pp. 91–106.

  39. 39.

    Wade, R (2003): Intro, p, xlviii.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    Ibid., p. l.

  42. 42.

    Yue, J (2014): “Has Globalization Led to China’s Rise?” Leaders, No. 8, pp. 41–58.

  43. 43.

    “Shao Ning: China’s economy as a whole and manufacturing companies will face two major challenges.” Caixin, 07/11/2014. https://opinion.caixin.com/m/2014-11-07/100748283.html.

  44. 44.

    Xinhuanet, Beijing, 10/12/2013.

  45. 45.

    “How to Forge an Upgrading of the Chinese Economy?” Qiushi (Seeking Truth, one of the CCP’s key mouthpieces), 01/01/2014.

  46. 46.

    U.S. Fact Sheet—Economic Track Fifth Meeting of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. 1/12/2013. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jl2011.

  47. 47.

    The Beijing News, 03/03/2016. https://finance.sina.cn/2016-03-03/detail-ifxqafrm6725036.d.html.

  48. 48.

    Yicai, 29/12/2016. http://www.yicai.com/news/5194392.html.

  49. 49.

    The Wenhui Daily, 08/03/2017. http://dzb.whb.cn/images/2017-03/08/5/50308.pdf.

  50. 50.

    The People’s Daily, 10/11/2017. http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2017-11/10/c_1121933058.htm.

  51. 51.

    The People’s Daily, 22/06/2018; Xinhua, 28/08/2018.

  52. 52.

    Black, J.S. & Morrison, A.J. (2021): “The Strategic Challenges of Decoupling.” Harvard Business Review, May–June, 99:3, pp. 49–54.

  53. 53.

    This report was issued on March 7, 2017. https://www.europeanchamber.com.cn/en/china-manufacturing-2025.

  54. 54.

    Miao Wei, Minister of Industry and Information Technology: ‘Made in China 2025’ treats domestic and foreign companies equally.” Xinhua, 11 March 2017.

  55. 55.

    Chang, H. J. (2003): Kicking away the Ladder—Development Strategy in Historical Perspectives. London: Anthem Press, pp. 17–18.

  56. 56.

    Interview with an informed source in Beijing, 06/11/2010.

  57. 57.

    Evans, P (1979): Dependent Development.

  58. 58.

    This author’s finding through conversations with within-system elites in recent years.

  59. 59.

    CPPCC Daily, 17/11/2015. http://www.rmzxb.com.cn/2015-11-17/624116.shtml.

  60. 60.

    NPF webinar: research fellow Alex Capri talked about Chinese techno-nationalism (12/06/2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jCMovZUIkk.

  61. 61.

    China’s industrial policy: Plan v Market.” The Economist, 05/11/2016. https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2016/11/05/plan-v-market.

  62. 62.

    Sohu, 06/11/2016. https://www.sohu.com/a/118268159_468680.

  63. 63.

    Sheng Hong: “From Chinese Manufacturing to Chinese Market.” Economists 50 Forum, 11/12/2018. http://www.50forum.org.cn/home/article/detail/id/7502.html.

  64. 64.

    “China Becomes Top Filer of International Patents in 2019 Amid Robust Growth for WIPO’s IP Services, Treaties and Finances.” WIPO, Geneva, April 2020. https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2020/article_0005.html.

  65. 65.

    Alex He (CIGI senior fellow): “What Do China’s High Patent Numbers Really Mean?” 20/04/2021. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/what-do-chinas-high-patent-numbers-really-mean/.

  66. 66.

    Lian Ping: “Manufacturing Transformation under the New Development Pattern.” Sina Caijing, 09/03/2021. https://finance.sina.cn/zl/2021-03-09/zl-ikknscsh9728236.d.html?vt=4&cid=79615&node_id=79615; Ful Report: https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202103121471113543_1.pdf?1615537448000.pdf.

  67. 67.

    21st Century Economic Report, 16/10/2019. https://tech.ifeng.com/c/7qp0oL5yeXI.

  68. 68.

    Clarivate Top 100 Global Innovators 2023 report (released on 16/02/2023): https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2023/02/XBU975564118_Top-100-Innovators_Report_V7.2_singlepages.pdf.

  69. 69.

    Kennedy, S: “China’s Uneven High-Tech Drive: Implications for the United States.” CSIS, 27/02/2020. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-uneven-high-tech-drive-implications-united-states.

  70. 70.

    Schuman, M: “Don’t Believe the China Hype.” The Atlantic, 16/06/2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/06/united-states-china-power-influence/612961/.

  71. 71.

    Su Nan (2021): “How to Break the ‘Disadvantage of Backwardness’ of China’s Upgrading of Machine Tool Industry.” China’s Science and Technology, No. 4, pp. 1–4.

  72. 72.

    Wu Haoyang and Li Ping (2021): “Analyzing China’s Industrial Structure—Does China really Have ‘All the Industrial Categories Listed in the United Nations Industry Classification System’?” Ceibs Business Review, No. 6, pp. 76–82.

  73. 73.

    See report “China at Least 30 Years Away from Becoming Manufacturing ‘Great Power’: Former Minister.” BBC, 07/03/2021.

  74. 74.

    “Minister: Impetus for High-Quality Manufacturing.” China Daily, 09/03/2021. http://epaper.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202103/09/WS6046b750a31099a2343547fe.html.

  75. 75.

    In March 2018, a propagandistic movie titled “An Unmatched China” was screened in major theaters throughout the People’s Republic of China. The film aimed to showcase the achievements of the CCP under the leadership of Xi Jinping since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2012, presenting China as an “unmatched power” in various areas of economic and social development. As part of the Party’s “patriotic education” campaign, all state-sector work units were required to organize their staff to watch this movie.

  76. 76.

    China Daily, 09/03/2021.

  77. 77.

    The 21st Century Business Herald, 29/12/2019.

  78. 78.

    Yue, J (2014), pp. 41–58. The earliest version of this work was presented as a guest speech at an Oxford University seminar in May 2012, titled “What does Globalisation Mean for China’s Economic Development?” It was subsequently developed into a blog article on Global Policy Journal on May 24, 2012. You can access the article here: http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/24/05/2012/what-does-globalization-mean-china%E2%80%99s-economic-development.

  79. 79.

    Paul Krugman: “What Happened to Japan?—What Japan’s Economy Can Tell Us About China?” The New York Times, 25/07/2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/25/opinion/japan-china-economy.html; Martin Wolf: “How China can avoid the Japan trap?” The Financial Times, 26/09/2023. https://www.ft.com/content/156c092a-4313-48cc-8103-79bb26c0faaa.

  80. 80.

    Refer to the Reuters tweet on 26/12/2023. https://twitter.com/i/status/1739773079742738482.

  81. 81.

    Jain-Chandra, S, et al. (2018): “Inequality in China—Trends, Drivers and Policy Remedies.” IMF Working Paper (WP/18/127), June. https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/WP/2018/wp18127.ashx.

  82. 82.

    Beijing News, 01/01/2019.

  83. 83.

    ThePaper. CN, 08/08/2021. http://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_13950085.

  84. 84.

    Caixin, 03/06/2020. http://opinion.caixin.com/2020-06-03/101562409.html (content page deleted shorly). Caixin, 03/06/2020).

  85. 85.

    World Bank, 17/10/2018: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/10/17/nearly-half-the-world-lives-on-less-than-550-a-day. World Development Report 2012: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-8810-5.

  86. 86.

    A New Great Game—China, the U.S. and Technology—A Report By The China Senior Analyst Group, p. 11 (Published: 13/10/2020). https://www.spglobal.com/_division_assets/images/special-editorial/a-new-great-game-china-the-u.s.-and-technology/2019_05_csag_uschina.pdf.

  87. 87.

    Kvangraven, I. H. (2017): “The Relevance of Dependent Development—Then and Now: Peter Evans,” in Kvangraven, et al. (ed.): Dialogues on Development Volume 1: Dependency (eBook). NY: Institute for New Economic Thinking, p. 29.

  88. 88.

    Werner, J: “China Is Cheating at a Rigged Game.” Foreign Policy, 08/08/2018. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/08/china-is-cheating-at-a-rigged-game/

  89. 89.

    Yue, J (2018), pp. 17–18.

  90. 90.

    Khan, S. R. & Christiansen, J (2011), pp. 177–202, 257.

  91. 91.

    Yue. J (2014), pp. 41–58.

  92. 92.

    Wade, R (2003).

  93. 93.

    Haggard, S (2018): Developmental States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 7.

  94. 94.

    Sutton, A. C. (1972) National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union. LV: Dauphin Publications Inc.; Chan, C. L. (2015): “Fallen Behind: Science, Technology, and Soviet Statism.” Intersect. 8:3, pp. 1-11; Farley, R: “How Does Industrial Espionage Affect Economic Growth?” The Diplomat, 15/1/2017. https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-does-industrial-espionage-affect-economic-growth/.

  95. 95.

    The term “peaceful rise” was first introduced in 2003. Due to its sensitive nature, it gradually fell out of use starting from 2004, and was replaced by more moderate terms such as “peaceful development” and “harmonious world.“.

  96. 96.

    Zheng, B (2005): “China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great-Power Status.” Foreign Affairs, September/October, 84:5, pp. 18–24.

  97. 97.

    Dikötter, F (2022), p. 24.

  98. 98.

    “The Biggest Vote.” The New York Times, 18/05/2000. https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/opinion/essay-the-biggest-vote.html.

  99. 99.

    Sarotte, M. E. (2021): Not One Inch—America, Russia and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 283.

  100. 100.

    Klare, M. T.: “‘Congagement’ with China?—GOP hawks want containment; others favor more trade and more toughness.” The Nation, 12/04/2001. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/congagement-china/.

  101. 101.

    Fahnbulleh, M (2020): “The Neoliberal Collapse—Markets Are Not the Answer.” Foreign Affairs, January/February, 99:1, pp. 38–42.

  102. 102.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 18.

  103. 103.

    Bartel, F (2022), pp. 339–347.

  104. 104.

    Wu, G (2017), p. 297.

  105. 105.

    Fahnbulleh, M (2020): “The Neoliberal Collapse—Markets are not the Answer.” Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb, 99:1, pp. 38–43.

  106. 106.

    Pilsbury, M (2015): The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower. NY: Henry Holt and Co.

  107. 107.

    “Deng Xiaoping and the Formation of ‘Three Steps’ Development Strategy.” Guangming Daily, 03/08/2011.

  108. 108.

    Wang, J (2005): “China’s Search for Stability with America.” Foreign Affairs, September/October, 84:5, pp. 39–48.

  109. 109.

    Renato Cruz De Castro (2013): “The Obama Administration’s Strategic Pivot to Asia: From a Diplomatic to a Strategic Constrainment of an Emergent China?” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, September, 25:3, pp. 331–349.

  110. 110.

    “China Blinks on Yuan in late G-20 Deal.” The Wall Street Journal, 21/02/2011.

  111. 111.

    Dai Bingguo: “Stick to the Path of Peaceful Development.” 06/12/2010. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/zt_674979/ywzt_675099/2011nzt_675363/jianchizouhepingfazhandaolu_675415/201012/t20101206_7956521.shtml.

  112. 112.

    The China Press, 18/05/2011.

  113. 113.

    Li, C and Xu, L: “Chinese Enthusiasm and American Cynicism over the ‘New Concept of Great Power Relations.’” Brookings Commentary, 04/12/2014. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinese-enthusiasm-and-american-cynicism-over-the-new-type-of-great-power-relations/.

  114. 114.

    President Obama: “Writing the Rules for 21st Century Trade.” The White House, 15/02/2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/02/18/president-obama-writing-rules-21st-century-trade.

  115. 115.

    “TPP Deal: US and 11 Other Countries Reach Landmark Pacific Trade Pact.” The Guardian, 05/10/2015. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/oct/05/trans-pacific-partnership-deal-reached-pacific-countries-international-trade.

  116. 116.

    “Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Reached, but Faces Scrutiny in Congress.” The New York Times, 06/10/2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/business/trans-pacific-partnership-trade-deal-is-reached.html.

  117. 117.

    Chow, C. K. (2016): “How the United States Uses the Trans-Pacific Partnership to Contain China in International Trade.” Chicago Journal of International Law, 17:2, pp. 370–402.

  118. 118.

    As I knew from interaction with multiple sources from 2015 till 2022.

  119. 119.

    Frum, D: China is a Paper Dragon. The Atlantic, 03/05/2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/05/china-paper-dragon/618778/.

  120. 120.

    “It’s Still the Economy, Stupid! Obama Goes on the Attack.!” The Guardian, 20/09/2008. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/sep/20/uselections2008.barackobama.

  121. 121.

    Xinhua, 07/04/2017. http://www.xinhuanet.com//2017-04/07/c_1120769372.htm; Also “‘1,000 reasons’ for enhancing ties.” China Daily, 09/11/2017. http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-11/09/content_34333688.htm.

  122. 122.

    Chinese IR scholar Chu Ying of the Institute of International Relations harshly criticized the CCP’s expansive but ineffective foreign propaganda initiatives as ones that fell on deaf ears and focused instead on pleasing senior leaders and public opinion at home. He called such a failed attempt of extending Chinese “cultural soft power” as an “internalization of external propaganda” (“外宣内宣化”: waixuan neixuanhua). HK01, 16/07/2021. https://www.hk01.com/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E8%A7%80%E5%AF%9F/650707/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%A4%96%E5%AE%A3%E8%A2%AB%E6%8C%87%E6%B0%91%E7%B2%B9%E5%8C%96%E8%88%87%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%A3%E5%8C%96-%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E5%AD%B8%E8%80%85-%E5%BF%99%E8%91%97%E6%88%B0%E9%AC%A5-%E6%98%AF%E6%9C%80%E5%A4%A7%E5%95%8F%E9%A1%8C.

  123. 123.

    Yue, J (2018), p. 312.

  124. 124.

    McMaster, H. R. (2020), p. 126.

  125. 125.

    Beckley, M (2018): “The Power of Nations: Measuring What Matters.” International Security, 43:2, pp. 7–44.

  126. 126.

    Starrs, S (2013): “American Economic Power Hasn’t Declined—It Globalized! Summoning the Data and Taking Globalization Seriously.” International Studies Quarterly, No. 57, pp. 817–830.

  127. 127.

    Watkins, P: “Introduction: A Three-Pillar Strategic Framework for Competing with China,” in “Protect, Constrain, Contest Approaches for coordinated transatlantic economic and technological competition with China.” LSE IDEAS China Foresight Project (hereafter called “LSE-IDEAS Report 2021”), Jan, 2021. https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-Protect-Constrain-Contest.pdf.

  128. 128.

    “Peter Navarro, Trump’s Trade Warrior, Has Not Made His Peace with China.” The New York Times, 26/12/2019.

  129. 129.

    Cox, M (2022), p. 143.

  130. 130.

    Kroenig, M (2020): The Return of Great Power Rivalry, Democracy Versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S. and China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 179.

  131. 131.

    USTR’s 2021 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers (NTE), released on 31 March 2021. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/reports/2021/2021NTE.pdf; USTR: Rebalancing U.S.-China Trade: https://ustr.gov/phase-one.

  132. 132.

    “China signals ‘orderly’ implementation of phase one deal with the US.” Global Times, 25/04/2021. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202104/1222062.shtml.

  133. 133.

    “Episode 148: The EU’s new trade policy, with Sabine Weyand of DG Trade.” Chad Bown, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, interviews Sabine Weyand, Director General for Trade of the European Commission. 17/01/2021. https://www.tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/148-the-eU.S.-new-trade-policy-with-sabine-weyand-of-dg-trade/.

  134. 134.

    Zaobao, 08/09/2020.

  135. 135.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 380.

  136. 136.

    Westad, O. A.: “Identity Politics with Chinese Characteristics—How the CCP’s Quest to Define ‘China’ Shapes Beijing’s Agenda.” Foreign Affairs, 01/06/2021. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/identity-politics-chinese-characteristics.

  137. 137.

    On February 10, 2020, less than one month of the conclusion of the Phase One Agreement, USTR removed China from the list of developing countries. China Daily, 20/02/2020. “US removes China from list of developing countries.” China Daily, 20/02/2020. http://epaper.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202002/20/WS5e4de0d1a310a2fabb7a24f4.html.

  138. 138.

    Yue, J (2018), p.16.

  139. 139.

    Henry Paulson (2015, p. 393) tactfully wrote in his memoire that “the Chinese have not been very specific about what they want to change…”.

  140. 140.

    “Ex-PBOC chief says China must address ‘loopholes’ as part of WTO reform.” Reuters, 19/09/2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/U.S.-china-economy-zhou-idUSKCN1LZ0XU.

  141. 141.

    Nye, J (2015): Is the American Century over? Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 68.

  142. 142.

    According to Nealer, “On Capitol Hill and with each successive administration, the focus was on advancing U.S. interests and creating incentives for China that resulted in improved U.S. economic and security options in Asia.” Nealer, K. G.: “Trading Iron Curtain for Chinese Walls: Is it different this time?” in CSIS report: “China’s Uneven High-tech Drive.” 27/02/2020, pp. 47-50. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-uneven-high-tech-drive-implications-united-states.

  143. 143.

    “Mearsheimer: ‘The US Won’t Tolerate China as Peer Competitor.’” 23/09/2020. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/chinas-rise-and-conflict-with-us/a-55026173; Kitchen argued that “After all, no US leader seeks to encourage peer competitors.” Kitchen, N (2020): “Why American Grand Strategy Has Changed.” Global Affairs, 6:1, pp. 87–104.

  144. 144.

    Mastanduno, M (1997), pp. 49-88.

  145. 145.

    As the US Deputy Secretary of State, Robert Zoellick, remarked in 2005, “For fifty years, our policy was to fence in the Soviet Union while its own internal contradictions undermined it. For thirty years, our policy has been to draw out the People’s Republic of China. As a result, the China of today is simply not the Soviet Union of the late 1940s… Chinese leaders have decided that their success depends on being networked with the modern world.” “Wither China: From Membership to Responsibility?” R. Zoellick: Remarks to National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, 21/09/2005. https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm.

  146. 146.

    “U.S. ‘Benign China’ Policy Ending—CIA Analyst Declares China Now Waging Cold War on U.S.” The Washington Free Beacon, 24/07/2018. https://freebeacon.com/national-security/u-s-benign-china-policy-ending/

  147. 147.

    Kroenig, M (2020), p. 176.

  148. 148.

    Blackwill, R. D. & Tellis, A. J. (2015): “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy toward China.” Council on Foreign Relations Special Report released in April. https://www.cfr.org/report/revising-U.S.-grand-strategy-toward-china.

  149. 149.

    Kitchen, N and Cox, M (2019): “Power, structural power, and American Decline.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:6, pp. 734–752.

  150. 150.

    Cox, M (2022), p. 158.

  151. 151.

    MOFCOM, 21/05/2021. http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/tongjiziliao/sjtj/jsc/202105/20210503063494.shtml

  152. 152.

    Radio Free Asia, 04/12/2017. https://www.rfa.org/english/commentaries/energy_watch/chinas-oil-import-dependence-climbs-as-output-falls-12042017102429.html.

  153. 153.

    “China set for record crude oil imports in 2023, analysts say.” Reuters, 17/02/2023. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/china-set-record-crude-oil-imports-2023-analysts-2023-02-17/

  154. 154.

    Pomeranz, K (2001): “Is there an East Asian Development Path?” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 44:3, pp. 322–362.

  155. 155.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 244.

  156. 156.

    “President Barack Obama Says Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is ‘Smart, Humble.’” Perth Now, 15/04/2010. https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/nsw/president-barack-obama-says-prime-minister-kevin-rudd-is-smart-humble-ng-fe9b5c28fefd4406de67cef56dd015ed.

  157. 157.

    The author’s several conversations with informed sources in China in the past decade.

  158. 158.

    Klare, M. T. (2011): The Race for What’s Left: The Global Scramble for the World’s Last Resources. NY: Metropolitan Books.

  159. 159.

    Rosecrance, R & Miller, S (2015): The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

  160. 160.

    Ikenberry, J (2020): A World Safe for Democracy—Liberal Internationalism and the Crises of Global Order. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 273.

  161. 161.

    Paulson, H. M. (2015), p. 82.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianyong Yue .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yue, J. (2024). China’s Rise in a Semi-peripheral Orbit (After WTO Entry). In: Crony Comprador Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53154-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53154-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53153-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53154-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics