Abstract
The pervasive force with which the current algorithmic colonization has spread across both the state and civil society is the result of an attitude and state of mind, a sense of confidence and naivety that can only be explained by referring to a prior cultural context capable of defining and paving the way for what is now underway. The aim of this chapter is to analyse the cultural and political foundations that have enabled the rapid spread of AI across all spheres of life, in other words, what has come to be known as the algorithmic revolution. To a considerable extent mistrust and inequality explain the current democratic drift, but algorithmic reason has engaged with this situation through its theoretical scientific approach and technological application to the different spheres of the state and civil society. However, these two facets of algorithmic development require and presuppose the application of evaluative criteria of legitimacy, or to express it in simpler terms, consistency and a certificate of validity in order to operate. The ongoing accelerated phase of algorithmic colonization is impossible to understand, and still harder to explain, unless we can comprehend what preceded it: a terrain fertilized by scientism or objectivism. However we may wish to refer to it, for years this terrain has been reducing human development to technological development, and now, as if amid a perfect storm, it has now been supplemented with neuropower and post-truth.
In that Empire, the Art of Cartography attained such Perfection that the map of a single Province occupied an entire City, and the map of the Empire, an entire Province. In time, these Excessive Maps did not satisfy and the Schools of Cartographers built a Map of the Empire, that was of the Size of the Empire, and which coincided point for point with it. Less Addicted to the Study of Cartography, the Following Generations understood that that dilated Map was Useless and not without Pitilessness they delivered it to the Inclemencies of the Sun and the Winters. In the Deserts of the West endure broken Ruins of the Map, inhabited by Animals and Beggars; in the whole country there is no other relic of the Disciplines of Geography.
Jorge Luis Borges, Del rigor de la ciencia (1960)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Apel, K.O. 2000. Globalization and the Need for Universal Ethics. European Journal of Social Theory 3 (2): 137–155.
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1960. Del rigor de la ciencia. In El hacedor, ed. J.L. Borges. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.
Conill, J. 2019. Intimidad corporal y persona humana. Madrid: Tecnos.
Cortina, A. 1993. Ética aplicada y democracia radical. Madrid: Tecnos.
d’Ancona, M. 2017. Post-truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. Random House.
Dahlberg, L. 2011. Re-constructing Digital Democracy: An Outline of Four ‘Positions’. New Media & Society, September 2011, 13. Dunagan, J.F. Politics for the Neurocentric Age. op.cit., p. 59.
Dahlberg, L., and E. Siapera, eds. 2007. Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave.
Dunagan, J.F. 2004. Neuro-Futures: The Brain, Politics and Power. Journal of Futures Studies 9 (2, November): 1–18.
Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Finn, E. 2018. What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fuchs, C. 2017. From Digital Positivism and Administrative Big Data Analytics Towards Critical Digital and Social Media Research. European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 37–49.
García-Marzá, D. 2005. Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3): 209–219.
———. 2013. Neuropolitics and Democracy: A Necessary Dialogue. Daimon International Review of Philosophy 59: 171–182.
———. 2021. Posverdad. In Glosario de patologías sociales, ed. M.S. Cenci and J. Pizzi. Brasil: UPFEL.
Generalitat Valenciana. 2018. Estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial de la Comunidad Valenciana.
Gillespie, T. 2012. Can an Algorithm Be Wrong? Limnologica 1 (2).
———. 2016. # trendingistrending: When Algorithms Become Culture. In Algorithmic Cultures, 64–87. Routledge.
Habermas, J. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Vol. 404. Boston: Beacon Press.
———. 1987. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Polity Press.
———. 2018. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Wiley.
———. 2021. Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit. In Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? 470–500. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
———. 2022. Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und die deliberative Politik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Harari, Y.N. 2016. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Random House.
Harsin, J. 2015. Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique 8 (2): 327–333.
Hill, R.K. 2016. What an Algorithm Is. Philosophy and Technology 29 (1): 35–59.
Horkheimer, M. 1972. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Vol. 1. A&C Black.
Husserl, E. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Jones, M.L. 2018. How We Became Instrumentalists (Again) Data Positivism Since World War II. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 48 (5): 673–684.
Kant, I. Akademische Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences.
Kitchin, R. 2017. Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 14–29.
Lakoff, G. 2008. The Political Mind. New York: Viking.
———. 2014. The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Larson, E.J. 2021. The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lash, Scott. 2007. Power After Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.
Lukes, E. 1985. El poder, Un enfoque radical, XXI. Madrid: Siglo.
Lukes, S. 2021. Power: A Radical View. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mager, A. 2012. Algorithmic Ideology: How Capitalist Society Shapes Search Engines. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 769–787.
Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western democracy. Verso Books.
Mittelstadt, B.D., and L. Floridi. 2016. The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts. In The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data, 445–480. Springer.
Mittelstadt, B.D., P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi. 2016. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2).
Morozov, E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
Neumann, G., G.E. Marcus, G. Grigler, and M. Mackuen. 2007. The Affect Effect- Dynamics of Emotions in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Broadway books.
Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin.
Rehg, W. 2015. Discourse Ethics for Computer Ethics: A Heuristic for Engaged Dialogic Reflection. Ethics and Information Technology 17 (1): 27–39.
Striphas, T. 2015. Algorithmic Culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 395–412.
Taddeo, M., and L. Floridi. 2018. How AI Can Be a Force for Good. Science 361 (6404): 751–752.
Tsamados, A., N. Aggarwal, J. Cowls, J. Morley, H. Roberts, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi. 2022. The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions. AI & Society 37 (1): 215–230.
van Dijck, Joseph. 2016. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Westen, D. 2007. The Political Brain. New York: Public Affairs.
Wolkenstein, A., R.J. Jox, and O. Friedrich. 2018. Brain-Computer Interfaces: Lessons to Be Learned from the Ethics of Algorithms. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4): 635–646.
Wolton, D. 2018. Information and Communication: An Urgent Theoretical Situation. Hermes, La Revue 82 (3): 10–18.
Wrong, D.H. 1997. Power. London: Transaction Publishers.
Yuste, R., S. Goering, G. Bi, J.M. Carmena, A. Carter, J.J. Fins, et al. 2017. Four Ethical Priorities for Neurotechnologies and AI. Nature 551 (7679): 159–163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Marzá, D., Calvo, P. (2024). A Critique of Algorithmic Reason. In: Algorithmic Democracy. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53015-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53015-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53014-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53015-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)