Skip to main content

Three Types of Negotiation

Bargaining, Problem-Solving and Consensus-Building

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solution-Focused Negotiation
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Conflict is a problem with different demands for its resolution. Solution-Focused Negotiation is an intensive attempt to reach practical and enforceable agreements that settle the conflict by peaceful means. However, negotiation is a broad concept. Negotiation involves various methods, settings and procedures for scholars, practitioners and negotiators. This chapter introduces three types of negotiation—bargaining, problem-solving and consensus-building—with their origins, applications and implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, Edward E., Paul Jureidini, and Ronald McLaurin. 1978. Protracted Social Conflict; Theory and Practice in the Middle East. Journal of Palestine Studies, 8 (1): 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 2001. Moral Science and Moral Order, Vol. 17 of The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, Daniel & Sebenius, James K. 2003. The Mediator as Coalition Builder: George Mitchell in Northern Ireland. International Negotiation, 8 (1): 111–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, Daniel, James K. Sebenius, and Michael Watkins. 2004. Two Paths to Peace: Contrasting George Mitchell in Northern Ireland with Richard Holbrooke in Bosnia–Herzegovina. Negotiation Journal 20 (4): 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Paul. 2008. Northern Ireland: The politics of war and peace. New York and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Roger, Ury, William L. & Patton, Bruce. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald J. 1997. Interactive Conflict Resolution. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2019. Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know about the People We Don't Know. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Sapir & Shoham, Shlomo Giora. 2009. Transference as Therapy: Psychotherapy as a Laboratory for Developing Social Theory of Change. Divinatio 30: 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Sapir. 2009. Thought Manipulation: The Use and Abuse of Psychological Trickery. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Sapir. 2012. Two complementary settings of peace-making diplomacy: political-elite diplomacy and public diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 23(1): 162–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Sapir. 2021. Elements of Peacemaking Revolutions: Leaders, People and Institutions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Sapir. 2023. Interwoven Models of Peacemaking–the Israeli-Palestinian Case and Beyond. Diplomacy & Statecraft 34 (4): 723–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. 2013. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman Herbert C. 1965. Manipulation of human behavior: An ethical dilemma for the social scientist. Journal of Social Issues, 21 (2): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Herbert C. 1996. Negotiation as interactive problem solving. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 1 (1): 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, George John.1999. Making Peace. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, Robert H. 2010. Bargaining with the devil: When to negotiate, when to fight. New York, Toronto and Sydney: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S. 2008. Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, 7th edition. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, Northcote. 1958. Parkinson's Law. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, Dean. 2007. Readiness theory and the Northern Ireland conflict. American Behavioral Scientist, 50 (11): 1520–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripsman, Norrin M., and Jack S. Levy. 2008. Wishful thinking or buying time? The logic of British appeasement in the 1930s. International Security, 33 (2): 148–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World politics 43 (4): 479–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Henry, William Evans, Daniel Honemann, and Balch, Thomas. 2004. Robert's rules of order, newly revised, in brief. Cambridge, Mass: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. 2005. “An Astonishing Sixty Years: The Legacy of Hiroshima.” Prize lecture: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/schelling-lecture.pdf

  • Stanton, Fredrik. 2011. Great Negotiations: Agreements that Changed the Modern World. Yardley, PA: Westholme Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, Daniel. 2004. “Rational appeasement.” International Organization 58 (2): 345–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, Viktor J. 2005. Market and State: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1): 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. The Paradox of “Warlord” Democracy: A Theoretical Investigation. American Political Science Review, 98 (1): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Gerhard L. 1988. “Munich After 50 Years.” Foreign Affairs 67 (1): 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Handelman, S. (2024). Three Types of Negotiation. In: Solution-Focused Negotiation. Professional Practice in Governance and Public Organizations . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52876-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics