Skip to main content

Imoinda in Berlin: Feminists and the Cultural Memory of Slavery After 1848

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Memory and Social Movements in Modern and Contemporary History

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements ((PSHSM))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the intersection between the discourses of antislavery and of women’s rights in the aftermath of 1848. It discusses cases of women’s reception of antislavery history and cultural production in different cities: Rochester (New York), Paris, and Berlin. It aims to show two things. First, it discusses how women’s rights advocates drew inspiration from the transnational movement to abolish slavery, in which some of them were also personally involved. In light of developments in France, they used abolition to frame and draw attention to their own grievances. Second, I argue that women’s rights advocates used the transnational cultural memory of antislavery to redefine the significance of 1848 for their own purposes. As the chapter shows, these efforts of reception happened across different media, including tomes like German Luise Mühlbach’s historical novel Aphra Behn (1849); the periodicals and almanacs associated with French Jeanne Deroin (1848–1853); Lucretia Mott’s speeches; and British Quaker Anne Knight’s open letters to colleagues and dignitaries (1848–1852).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    N.A. Hewitt, ‘“Seeking a Larger Liberty”: Remapping First Wave Feminism’, in: K.K. Sklar and J. Brewer Stewart (eds.), Women’s Rights and Transatlantic Antislavery in the Era of Emancipation (New Haven, CT, 2007), pp. 266–278, p. 272.

  2. 2.

    B.S. Anderson, ‘The Lid Comes Off: International Radical Feminism and the Revolutions of 1848’, in: NWSA Journal, 10:2 (1998), pp. 1–12, pp. 5–6; Hewitt, ‘“Seeking a Larger Liberty”: Remapping First Wave Feminism’; W.C. McDaniel, The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery: Garrisonian Abolitionists and Transatlantic Reform (Baton Rouge, LA, 2013), p. 185 ff; M. Sinha, The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (New Haven, CT, 2016), pp. 363 ff.

  3. 3.

    J.E. Dixon-Fyle, Female Writers’ Struggle for Rights and Education for Women in France (1848–1871) (Bern, 2006).

  4. 4.

    Anderson, ‘The Lid Comes Off: International Radical Feminism and the Revolutions of 1848’; R. Nemes, ‘Women in the 1848–1849 Hungarian Revolution’, in: Journal of Women’s History, 13:3 (2001), pp. 193–207. Project MUSE, DOI:10.1353/jowh.2001.0072.

  5. 5.

    Anderson, ‘The Lid Comes off: International Radical Feminism and the Revolutions of 1848’; K. Offen, European Feminisms, 1700–1950: A Political History (Stanford, CA, 2003), pp. 108ff.

  6. 6.

    Anderson, ‘The Lid Comes off: International Radical Feminism and the Revolutions of 1848’; Offen, European Feminisms, 1700–1950: A Political History, p. 112; B.S. Anderson, Joyous Greetings: The First International Women’s Movement, 1830–1860 (Oxford and New York, 2000); M. McFadden, Golden Cables of Sympathy: The Transatlantic Sources of Nineteenth-Century Feminism (Lexington, KY, 1999); A. Primi, ‘Die Frauen-Zeitung et L’Almanach des femmes, dernières tribunes des “femmes de 1848”’, in: Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine (2005), pp. 129–146; S. Delvallez and A. Primi, ‘L’épineuse couronne de la féminité. Féminin, religion et politique au lendemain de 1848. France-Allemagne’, in: Revue d’histoire du XIXe siècle. Société d’histoire de la révolution de 1848 et des révolutions du XIXe siècle, 28 (2004), pp. 95–110. journals.openedition.org, DOI:10.4000/rh19.620; M. Tamboukou, Sewing, Fighting and Writing: Radical Practices in Work, Politics and Culture (Lanham, MD, 2016).

  7. 7.

    P. Nora, ‘From Lieux de mémoire to Realms of Memory [Preface to the English-Language Edition]’, in: P. Nora and L.D. Kritzman (eds.), Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 1, trans. A. Goldhammer (New York, 1996), pp. xv–xxiv.

  8. 8.

    I. Irwin-Zarecka, Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory (Piscataway Township, NJ, 1994), p. 7.

  9. 9.

    E. Zerubavel, Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past (Chicago, 2003), p. 8.

  10. 10.

    M. Rothberg, Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford, CA, 2009), p. 11; see also, M. Rothberg, ‘From Gaza to Warsaw: Mapping Multidirectional Memory’, in: Criticism, 53:4 (2012), pp. 523–548. muse-jhu-edu.proxy.library.uu.nl, doi:10.1353/crt.2011.0032.

  11. 11.

    Rothberg. Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization, p. 19.

  12. 12.

    C. Sussman, ‘Women and the Politics of Sugar, 1792’, in: Representations, 48 (1994), pp. 48–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928610; C. Midgley, ‘Slave Sugar Boycotts, Female Activism and the Domestic Base of British Anti‐Slavery Culture’, in: Slavery & Abolition, 17:3 (1996), pp. 137–162, Taylor and Francis+NEJM, doi:10.1080/01440399608575190; J.L. Holcomb, ‘Blood-Stained Sugar: Gender, Commerce and the British Slave-Trade Debates’, in: Slavery & Abolition, 35:4 (2014), pp. 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2014.927988.

  13. 13.

    B. Carey, British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility: Writing, Sentiment and Slavery, 1760–1807 (London, 2005), p. 187; see also; W. Sypher, Guinea’s Captive Kings: British Anti-Slavery Literature of the XVIIIth Century (Chapel Hill, NC, 1942); G.E. Boulukos, ‘Maria Edgeworth’s “Grateful Negro” and the Sentimental Argument for Slavery”, in: Eighteenth-Century Life, 23:1 (1999), pp. 12–29; B. Carey, et al. (eds.), Discourses of Slavery and Abolition: Britain and its Colonies, 1760–1838 (London, 2004).

  14. 14.

    M. Wood, The Horrible Gift of Freedom: Atlantic Slavery and the Representation of Emancipation (Athens, GA, 2010), p. 19; S. Lentz, ‘Abolitionists in the German Hinterland? Therese Huber and the Spread of Anti-Slavery Sentiment in the German Territories in the Early Nineteenth Century’, in: F. Brahm and E. Rosenhaft (eds.), Slavery Hinterland: Transatlantic Slavery and Continental Europe, 1680–1850 (Woodbridge, 2016), pp. 187–212, pp. 187; M.J. Cutter, The Illustrated Slave: Empathy, Graphic Narrative, and the Visual Culture of the Transatlantic Abolition Movement, 1800–1852 (Athens, GA, 2017), pp. 29 ff.

  15. 15.

    M. Janse, De afschaffers: publieke opinie, organisatie en politiek in Nederland 1840–1888 (Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 125–127.

  16. 16.

    This was certainly not exclusively the case in Europe and the US; Jyotiba Phule’s Gulamgiri (Slavery, 1873; discussed elsewhere in the volume by Arnab Roy Chowdhury) is a powerful example of the cultural significance of antislavery narratives for Indian reformers.

  17. 17.

    D.B. Davis, Slavery and Human Progress (New York, 1984), p. 110.

  18. 18.

    S.V. Hartman, Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America (Oxford and New York, 1997).

  19. 19.

    M. Wood, Slavery, Empathy, and Pornography (Oxford, 2002); ibid., The Horrible Gift of Freedom: Atlantic Slavery and the Representation of Emancipation (Athens, GA, 2010).

  20. 20.

    S. Sillen, Women Against Slavery (Masses & Mainstream, 1955); B.G. Hersch, The Slavery of Sex: Feminist-Abolitionists in America (Urbana, IL, 1978); J.F. Yellin, Women & Sisters: The Antislavery Feminists in American Culture (New Haven, CT, 1989); J.F. Yellin and J.C. Van Horne, The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women’s Political Culture in Antebellum America (Ithaca, NY, 1994).

  21. 21.

    E.C. Stanton et al. (eds.), History of Woman Suffrage, vols. 1–3 [1881–1886]. 1882, vol. I and II. Rochester, S.B. Anthony [Rochester], 1887. Internet Archive, http://archive.org/details/historyofwomansu02stanuoft, pp. 52ff.

  22. 22.

    Hewitt, ‘“Seeking a Larger Liberty”: Remapping First Wave Feminism’, p. 272.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., p. 273.

  24. 24.

    L. Mott, ‘American Anti-Slavery Society, Broadway Tabernacle, New York City, May 9, 1848’, in: C. Densmore, C. Faulkner, N. Hewitt and B.W. Palmer (eds.), Lucretia Mott Speaks: The Essential Speeches and Sermons (Urbana, IL, 2017), pp. 60–64, p. 62.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 63.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., p. 61.

  27. 27.

    B. Fagan, ‘The North Star and the Atlantic 1848’, in: African American Reviews, 47:1 (2014), pp. 51–67; W.C. McDaniel, The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery: Garrisonian Abolitionists and Transatlantic Reform (Baton Rouge, LA, 2013).

  28. 28.

    L. Tetrault, The Myth of Seneca Falls: Memory and the Women’s Suffrage Movement, 1848–1898 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2014); S. Van den Elzen and B. Waaldijk, ‘History as Strategy: Imagining Universal Feminism in the Women’s Movement’, in: S. Berger, S. Scalmer and C. Wicke (eds.), Remembering Social Movements: Activism and Memory (London, 2021), pp. 60–82; S. Van den Elzen, Antislavery in the Transnational Movement for Women’s Rights, 1832–1914: A Study of Memory Work (Utrecht University Unpublished PhD thesis, 2021).

  29. 29.

    J. Deroin and P. Roland, ‘Letter to the Convention of the Women of America (1851)’, in: M. Moynagh and N. Forestell (eds.), Documenting First Wave Feminisms. Volume 1: Transnational Collaborations and Crosscurrents (Toronto, 2011), pp. 113–116, p. 113.

  30. 30.

    D. de. Girardin, ‘Lettres parisiennes’, in: Oeuvres completes de Delphine de Girardin, vol. 4. Henri Plon, 1861. Wikisource, fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Lettres_parisiennes, p. 468.

  31. 31.

    K. Offen, ‘Women and the Question of “Universal Suffrage”, in 1848: A Transatlantic Comparison of Suffragist Rhetoric’, in: NWSA Journal, 11:1 (1999), pp. 150–177, p. 154.

  32. 32.

    C. Fauré, Political and Historical Encyclopedia of Women (London and New York, 2004), p. 302.

  33. 33.

    “Anne Knight, a Woman’s Pioneer”, in: The Englishwoman’s Review: A Journal of Woman’s Work (15 January, 1884), pp. 9–12. Gale Cengage, 19th-Century UK Periodicals.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., p. 11.

  35. 35.

    J. Deroin, Campagne electorale de la citoyenne Jeanne Deroin, et pétition des femmes au peuple. Dépot central de la propagande socialiste, 1849. BnF, Paris, catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb30326926x,1.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., p. 2.

  37. 37.

    S. Drescher, ‘British Way, French Way: Opinion Building and Revolution in the Second French Slave Emancipation’, in: The American Historical Review, 96:3 (1991), pp. 709–34. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/2162428; N. Schmidt, ‘Les abolitionnistes français de l’esclavage, 1820–1850’, in: Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer, 87:326 (2000), pp. 205–244. Persée, www.persee.fr, doi:10.3406/outre.2000.3776.

  38. 38.

    D.G. Grigsby, ‘Cursed Mimicry: France and Haiti, Again (1848‐51)’, in: Art History, 38:1 (2015), pp. 68–105; see also, N. Schmidt, ‘Commémoration, histoire et historiographie: à propos du 150e anniversaire de l’abolition de l’esclavage dans les colonies françaises’, in: Ethnologie Française, 29:3 (1999), pp. 453–60. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40990158; N. Schmidt, ‘Teaching and Commemorating Slavery and Abolition in France: From Organised Forgetfulness to Historical Debates’, in: A.L. Araujo (ed.), Politics of Memory: Making Slavery Visible in Public Space (New York, 2012), pp. 106–123.

  39. 39.

    This examination was conducted through Retronews, the portal of the Bibliothèque Nationale devoted to their collection of historical news media. For the period 01 March 1848–5 May 1848, the quotidien collection serviced by Retronews only lists 10 hits for discussions of abolition (search exact phrase: ‘abolition d’esclavage’, ‘émancipation des esclaves’), compared to 12 hits for the abolition of marchandage, a form of subcontracting deemed exploitative (search exact phrase: ‘abolition du marchandage’), and 27 hits for the restrictions on the death penalty, proclaimed on 26–29 February (search exact phrase: peine de mort en matière politique). The coverage after formal abolition on 27 April differs even more widely; even though the abolition of slavery was in fact the newsworthy item in terms of policy, Retronews lists only 3 hits for abolition, compared to 24 for death penalty. Search conducted in March 2020.

  40. 40.

    F. Kunka, ‘The French Teacher at Kelmscott House: Cécile Desroches, Jeanne Deroin and the Utopian Socialist Connection’, in: Journal of William Morris Studies, 12:1 (2016), p. 59.

  41. 41.

    ‘Miss Knight’ in: Voix des femmes, 1:24 (15 April 1848), p. 3.

  42. 42.

    ‘Faits divers’ in: Voix des femmes, 1:11 (31 March 1848), pp. 3–4, p. 3.

  43. 43.

    ‘Introduction’, Almanach des femmes pour 1852. Edited by Jeanne Deroin, vol. 1. Jeanne Deroin [Paris], 1851. Microfiche. BnF, Paris, catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb343956961, p. 9.

  44. 44.

    “Convention des femmes en Amérique.” By Anna. Almanach des femmes, vol. 1, 1851, pp. 12–22.

  45. 45.

    “American reply to the Stafford-House Memorial.” Almanach des femmes, vol. 2, pp. 202–212.

    This text is in fact a sarcastic response to a British antislavery petition, the Stafford House Memorial. Deroin does not comment on the sarcasm, however, and treats it as a serious moral reform document relating to antislavery. Presumably, she did not have the original Stafford House Memorial at hand. The second almanac appeared in a bilingual edition, French and English.

  46. 46.

    “Abolition de l’esclavage”. Almanach des femmes, vol. 1, 1851, pp. 163–167, p. 167.

  47. 47.

    “Introduction”, Almanach des femmes pour 1852, p. 11.

  48. 48.

    P. Wilhelmy-Dollinger, Die Berliner Salons: mit Historisch-Literarischen Spaziergängen (Berlin and New York, 2000), p. 156.

  49. 49.

    C. Tönnesen, Die Vormärz-Autorin Luise Mühlbach. Vom sozialkritischen Frühwerk zum Historischen Roman (Neuss, 1997), p. 29, p. 264.

  50. 50.

    Ibid, pp. 259–260.

  51. 51.

    Ibid., p. 263.

  52. 52.

    Ibid.; G. Goetzinger, ‘“Allein das Bewußtsein dieses Befreienkönnens ist schon Erhebend.” Emanzipation und Politik in Publizistik und Roman des Vormärz’, in: G. Brinker-Gabler (ed.), Deutsche Literatur von Frauen. Erster Band. Vom Mittelalter bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts (Munich, 1988).

  53. 53.

    Tönnesen, Die Vormärz-Autorin Luise Mühlbach. Vom sozialkritischen Frühwerk zum Historischen Roman, p. 211.

  54. 54.

    Mühlbach, Luise. Aphra Behn. Erstes Buch: Oronooko. Simion, 1849. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum, mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10115050-0, vol. 1, 10, 213.

  55. 55.

    Ibid., pp. 156ff.

  56. 56.

    Ibid., e.g., p. 10.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., p. 171.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., p. 183.

  59. 59.

    Ibid.

  60. 60.

    Ibid., pp. 24–25.

  61. 61.

    L. Mühlbach, Aphra Behn. Zweites Buch: Die Restauration. Simion, 1849. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum, mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10115051-6, p. 284.

  62. 62.

    Ibid., p. 13.

  63. 63.

    Ibid, p. 267; L. Mühlbach, Aphra Behn. Drittes Buch: Die Dichterin Aphra Behn. Simion, 1849. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum, mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10115052-1, p. 303.

  64. 64.

    L. Mühlbach, Aphra Behn. Zweites Buch: Die Restauration. Simion, 1849. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum, mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10115051-6, pp. 324–325.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie van den Elzen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van den Elzen, S. (2024). Imoinda in Berlin: Feminists and the Cultural Memory of Slavery After 1848. In: Berger, S., Koller, C. (eds) Memory and Social Movements in Modern and Contemporary History. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52819-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52819-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52818-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52819-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics