Abstract
According to several market research reports, Moodle is the most widely used Learning Management System (LMS) in the world, but how intuitive is it for teachers? Does it make teachers’ experience easier or is it a burden for them? Does it help teachers reach the expected learning outcomes? In line with our experience, teachers find barriers when designing a course in the LMS and, hence, students face difficulties affecting their learning process. Even more, considering that users (both teachers and students) have different needs and levels of expertise with this tool. The pandemic, and the consequent forced migration to distance learning scenarios, made these difficulties even more visible and the need for solutions much more urgent. This article will explain how to improve teachers’ experiences using Moodle by applying User Experience (UX) methodologies such as quantitative and qualitative research, user journey mapping, and heuristic evaluation. Inclusive and accessible design principles were applied in this work to consider a wide variety of users. The research methods used, the results obtained, and the guidelines for improving the quality and effectiveness of Moodle-based courses will be explained throughout this article.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is a revised and extended version of a presentation given on the TLIC 2023 Conference.
- 2.
Created in the Moodle.org website (https://school.moodledemo.net/).
- 3.
User Journey template by Hanan A.S. https://miro.com/miroverse/profile/hanan-a-s/ (Included photo by Marivi Pazos on Unsplash).
References
Moodle Pty Ltd. Moodle. Accessed 8 Apr 2023
Dougiamas, M., Taylor, P.C.: Interpretive analysis of an internet-based course constructed using a new courseware tool called Moodle. de HERDSA 2002 Quality Conversations, Perth, Western Australia (2002)
Gamage, S., Ayres, J., Behrend, M.: A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. Int. J. STEM Educ. 1–24 (2022)
Babber, A.: LMS Statistics: Data, Trends & Predictions (2023). https://imagestation.com/lms-statistics/. Accessed 1 Apr 2023
International Organization for Standardization. ISO Online Browsing Platform (2010). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed 8 Apr 2023
Institute of Education Sciences. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/. Accessed 30 Apr 2023
Google. Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/. Accessed 30 Apr 2023
Fatih, D., Charmaine, B., Fahad, A.: User experience matters: does one size fit all? Evaluation of learning management systems. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 27, 49–67 (2021)
Ilia, M., Shahrokh, N., Preben, H.: Exploring user experience of learning management system. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 38(4), 344–363 (2021)
Layla, H.: Examining user experience of Moodle e-learning system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 12(11), 358–366 (2021)
Christina, G.: Facebook in tertiary education: the impact of social media in e-Learning. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 17(1), Article no. 3 (2020)
Tania, V.: TNW (2020). https://thenextweb.com/news/a-brief-history-of-ux-design-and-its-evolution. Accessed 30 Apr 2023
Donald, N.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, USA (1988)
Microsoft. Microsoft Inclusive Design. Microsoft. https://inclusive.microsoft.design/. Accessed 21 May 2023
Gibbons, S.: Nielsen Norman Group (2016). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/. Accessed 6 May 2023
Leigh Brown, J.: UX Booth (2018). https://www.uxbooth.com/articles/empathy-mapping-a-guide-to-getting-inside-a-users-head/. Accessed 2 May 2023
Gray, D.: Game storming (2009). https://gamestorming.com/empathy-map/. Accessed 2 May 2023
Kaplan, K.: Nielsen Norman Group (2023). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/user-journeys-vs-user-flows/. Accessed 15 May 2023
Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/heuristic-evaluation. Accessed 16 May 2023
Ramaswamy, S.: Nielsen Norman Group (2023). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/data-findings-insights-differences/. Accessed 2 May 2023
Design Kit. https://www.designkit.org/methods/how-might-we.html. Accessed 16 May 2023
Nielsen, J.: Nielsen Norman Group (2020). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 16 May 2023
Budiu, R.: Nielsen Norman Group (2017). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/wizards/. Accessed 16 May 2023
Microsoft. Microsoft Inclusive Design for Cognition Guidebook (2023)
Prabook. Prabook. https://prabook.com/web/martin.dougiamas/2274527. Accessed 21 May 2023
Hollowell, J.: Moodle forums (2007). https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=80637#p357476. Accessed 21 May 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cukierman, U., Cukierman, J. (2024). Applying UX Methodologies for Improving Moodle Usage. In: Auer, M.E., Cukierman, U.R., Vendrell Vidal, E., Tovar Caro, E. (eds) Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education. ICL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 900. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52667-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52667-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52666-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52667-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)