Abstract
Students construct mental models as internal symbolic representations based on their observations of occurrences and events to comprehend the world around them. Various methods have been reported to diagnose students’ misconceptions among which questionnaires with multimodality characteristics that can be utilized as tools for detecting learners’ alternate perceptions. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of two pedagogical approaches, namely a self-constructed tangible model and a 3D virtual model, in terms of learning outcomes related to astronomy concepts and phenomena. The study encompassed every aspect of a didactic course path, including identification and assessment of alternative ideas, diagnostic evaluation, final evaluation, and fostering of metacognitive skills. Our research sample consists of 105 Junior high school students, aged thirteen to fifteen, coming from six different classes. The research approach included students’ ideas detection, a teaching intervention and analysis of the results. A mixed method approach (quantitative and qualitative) was followed for validity and reliability reasons. Research revealed that the use of a well-designed model (real or virtual) may comprehensively help in the detection students’ alternative ideas, the elicitation of hypotheses/predictions, provision of feedback and students’ metacognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, F.: Determining students’ mental models about the sun, earth, and moon celestial objects for sustainable learning in astronomy education in Libya. Afr. Educ. Res. J. 9(3), 825–832 (2021)
Tsihouridis, C., Vavougios, D., Ioannidis, G.S.: The effectiveness of virtual laboratories as a contemporary teaching tool in the teaching of electric circuits in Upper High School as compared to that of real labs. In: 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Kazan, Russia, pp. 816–820 (2013)
Asghar, A., Huang, Y.S., Elliott, K., Skelling, Y.: Exploring secondary students’ alternative conceptions about engineering design technology. Educ. Sci. 9(1), 45 (2019)
Potvin, P.: The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change.” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 5(1), 55–66 (2017)
Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., McDermott, L.C.: A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 11(5), 989–1008 (2015)
Beichner, R.J.: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. Am. J. Phys. 62(8), 750–762 (1994)
Schmidt, H.J.: Students’ misconceptions- looking for a pattern. Sci. Educ. 81(2), 123–135 (1997)
Gómez-Soberón, J.M., Gómez-Soberón, M.C., Corral-Higuera, R., Arredondo-Rea, S.P., Almaral-Sánchez, J.L., Cabrera-Covarrubias, F.G.: Calibrating questionnaires by psychometric analysis to evaluate knowledge. SAGE Open 3(3), 215824401349915 (2013)
Baxter, J.: Children’s understanding of astronomy and the earth sciences. In: Glynn, S.M., Duit, R. (eds.) Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice, pp. 155–177. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1995)
Shen, J., Confrey, J.: Justifying alternative models in learning astronomy: a study of K–8 science teachers’ understanding of frames of reference. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32(1), 1–29 (2010)
Gali, F.: Secondary school children’s understanding of basic astronomy concepts. J. Stud. Soc. Sci. Hum. 7(3), 328–342 (2021)
Lelliott, A., Rollnick, M.: Big ideas: a review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32(13), 1771–1799 (2010)
Cheek, K.Q: Students’ understanding of large numbers as a key factor in their understanding of geologic time. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 10, 1047 (2012)
Pundak, D.: Evaluation of conceptual frameworks in astronomy. Prob. Educ. 21st Century 69, 57 (2016)
Taylor, I., Barker, M., Jones, A.: Promoting mental model building in astronomy education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25(10), 1205–1225 (2003)
Rollinde, E.: Modeling astronomy education, the case of F-HOU tools: SalsaJ and Human Orrery. In: Ros, R.M., Garcia, B., Gullberg, S., Moldon, J., Rojo, P. (eds) Education and Heritage in the era of Big Data in Astronomy Proceedings IAU Symposium, Virtual, France, no. 367 (2021)
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1999)
Acknowledgments
Τhis paper has been financed by the funding program “MEDICUS”, of the University of Patras.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsihouridis, C., Mitrakas, N., Batsila, M., Vavougios, D. (2024). A Holistic View of Using Real and Virtual Models in Teaching Astronomy Concepts. In: Auer, M.E., Cukierman, U.R., Vendrell Vidal, E., Tovar Caro, E. (eds) Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education. ICL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 900. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52667-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52667-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52666-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52667-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)