Abstract
In this chapter we describe the conduct and results of two field-demonstration studies where the HADRIAN innovations were integrated into real vehicles and their effectiveness in terms of the human driver role were evaluated. In the first field-demonstration, twelve participants evaluated HADRIAN innovations that were intended to improve the safety and comfort of using automated driving at SAE L2 and L3. The study was performed in a passenger vehicle in an open road environment where participants compared interactions with a baseline automated vehicle with the HADRIAN innovations. In the second field-demonstration, ten participants experienced HADRIAN innovations that were intended to facilitate older drivers in a small passenger vehicle while driving on a test track in Spain. The results of both studies confirmed the key assumptions of the HADRIAN approach and identified limits and opportunities. We discuss these main lessons learned and conclude with what these findings tell us about the benefits and problems of adopting a holistic, user-centered approach for automated driving solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
References
Abdi H (2007) The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. Encycl Meas Stat 19
Bengler K, Zimmermann M, Bortot D, Kienle M, Damböck D (2012) Interaction principles for cooperative human-machine systems. It Inform Technol 54(4):157–164. https://doi.org/10.1524/itit.2012.0680
Boy GA (2013) Orchestrating human-centered design. Springer
C-Roads WG2 (2021) C-ITS infrastructure functions and specifications. 125
Ebinger N, Trösterer S, Neuhuber N, Mörtl P (2023) Conceptualisation and evaluation of adaptive driver tutoring for conditional driving automation. HFES Europe chapter conference Liverpool 2023. https://www.hfes-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Ebinger2023.pdf
Endsley MR (2016) From here to autonomy: lessons learned from human–automation research. Hum Fact 0018720816681350
Eriksson A, Stanton N (2016) Take-over time in highly automated vehicles: Non-critical transitions to and from manual control. Hum Fact. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/403717/
Eriksson A, Stanton NA (2017) Driving performance after self-regulated control transitions in highly automated vehicles. Hum Fact 16
Marx C, Ebinger N, Santuccio E, Moertl P (2022) Bringing the driver back in-the-loop: usefulness of letting the driver know the duration of an automated drive and its impact on takeover performance. Conference proceedings. Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, New York
Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Tichon J, Briant O (2021) Is a flick-through enough? A content analysis of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) user manuals. PLoS ONE 16(6):e0252688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252688
SAE International (2021) Taxomony and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles: (Nr. J3016)
Sarabia J, Marcano M, Diaz S, Zubizarreta A, Perez J (2024) An MPC-based shared control algorithm for hazard mitigation in driver assistance systems: a vehicle study (in production)
Shi E, Bengler K (2022) Non-driving related tasks’ effects on takeover and manual driving behavior in a real driving setting: a differentiation approach based on task switching and modality shifting. Accid Anal Prev 178:106844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106844
Acknowledgements
The planning, preparations, and execution of the field-studies were a joint effort of many partners. Therefore, we want to sincerely thank the following people for their contributions: Karl Lambauer, Kenan Mujkic, Martin Ruidigier, Georg Nestlinger, Kailing Tong, Christian Groß, and Peter Sammer from Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH (Austria); Alexander Mirnig, Magdalena Gärtner, Vivien Wallner, and Jakub Sypniewski from Center for Human-Computer Interaction (Austria); as well as Christos Katrakazas, Marianthi Kallidoni, and George Yannis from NTUA (Greece). HADRIAN has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 875597. This document reflects only the author's view, the Climate Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (CINEA) is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. Part of the publication was written at Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH in Graz and partially funded within the COMET K2 Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action (BMK), the Austrian Federal Ministry for Labour and Economy (BMAW), the Province of Styria (Dept. 12) and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG). The Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) has been authorised for the programme management.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moertl, P. et al. (2024). Results of Two Demonstrations of Holistic Solutions for Automated Vehicles to Increase Usefulness and Safety. In: Moertl, P., Brandstaetter, B. (eds) Shaping Automated Driving to Achieve Societal Mobility Needs. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52550-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52550-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52549-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52550-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)