Skip to main content

Durkheim

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociological Theory
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will consider Durkheim’s principal works and all the main concepts associated with them: The Division of Labor in Society, The Rules of Sociological Method, Suicide, and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.

A detailed analysis will be dedicated to Durkheim’s theory of social facts, his most enduring contribution to sociological theory, and his concept of “anomie.”

The text will also expose Durkheim’s theory of the origin of religion using the AETR scheme this author worked out. AETR is an acronym for Association, Effervescence, Totem, and Rites.

The topic of causal explanation and the method of concomitant variations will be covered using examples to make Durkheim’s methodology clearer.

The final section will feature scholars who criticized Durkheim’s methodological collectivism and explanations for suicide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acevedo, Gabriel A. 2005. Turning Anomie on Its Head: Fatalism as Durkheim’s Concealed and Multidimensional Alienation Theory. Sociological Theory 23 (1): 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Bert N., and R.A. Sydie. 2001. Sociological Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 2016. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antiseri, Dario. 1992. L’individualismo metodologico. Una polemica sul mestiere dello scienziato sociale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbagli, Marzio. 2015. Farewell to the World: A History of Suicide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed, Warren. 1970. The Negro and Fatalistic Suicide. The Pacific Sociological Review 13 (3): 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, Bruce P. 1959. Egoism, Altruism, Anomie, and Fatalism: A Conceptual Analysis of Durkheim’s Types. American Sociological Review 24 (4): 466–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Jack D. 1967. The Social Meanings of Suicide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile. [1893] 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. George Simpson, trans. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1912] 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1916] 2005. The Dualism of Human Nature and Its Social Conditions. Durkheimian Studies 11 (1): 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1897] 2006. On Suicide. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1895] 2013. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. Steven Lukes, ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich. [1890] 1986. Letter to Conrad Schmidt of 27 October 1890. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Jonathan S. 2013. Homo Duplex Revisited: A Defence of Émile Durkheim’s Theory of the Moral Self. Journal of Classical Sociology 13 (3): 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzi, Gregor, and Nicola Marcucci. 2017. Durkheim in Germany: The Performance of a Classic. Journal of Classical Sociology 17 (4): 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony, ed. 1986. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, Maurice. 2018. In La sociologia di Émile Durkheim, ed. Teresa Grande and Lorenzo Migliorati. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izzo, Alberto. 1994. Storia del pensiero sociologico. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Friedrich. 1970. Storia della sociologia. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Capra, Dominick. 1985. Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamanna, Mary Ann. 2001. Emile Durkheim on the Family. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Jennifer M. 1994. Durkheim and Women. Lincoln, Neb: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 1985. Emile Durkheim. His Life and Work. A Historical and Critical Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Sanjoy, and Shampa Mazumdar. 1997. Religious Traditions and Domestic Architecture: A Comparative Analysis of Zoroastrian and Islamic Houses in Iran. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 14 (3): 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1930. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. Eight Edition. London; New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi, Gianfranco. 1972. Images of Society: Essays on the Sociological Theories of Tocqueville, Marx, and Durkheim. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Durkheim (Founders of Modern Political and Social Thought). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, Whitney. 1976. Durkheim’s “Suicide”: A Classic Analyzed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. [1944] 2013. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. 1996. Durkheim’s Epistemology: The Neglected Argument. American Journal of Sociology 102 (2): 430–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvin, Hanan C. 1958. Durkheim’s Suicide and Problems of Empirical Research. American Journal of Sociology 63 (6): 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. 2013. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. New Orleans: Quid Pro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976. In An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, and W.B. Todd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Leonard V., Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, and Annette Becker. 2003. France and the Great War, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Walter Baldwin, and Francis J. Gillen. 1899. The Native Tribes of Central Australia. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman Jones, S.G. 1995. Charles Renouvier and Émile Durkheim: ‘Les Règles de La MÉthode Sociologique’. Sociological Perspectives 38 (1): 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wolf, Jan Jacob. 1987. Wundt and Durkheim a Reconsideration of a Relationship. Anthropos 82 (1–3): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Lung-Chang. 1972. Altruistic Suicide: A Subjective Approach. Sociological Bulletin 21 (2): 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orsini, A. (2024). Durkheim. In: Sociological Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52539-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52539-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52538-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52539-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics