Skip to main content

Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation of Errors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Econometrics

Part of the book series: Classroom Companion: Economics ((CCE))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

The regression model is a random model in the sense that an error term is included in the equation linking the dependent variable to the explanatory variables. The ordinary least squares method—the most frequently used estimation method—supposes (i) the absence of autocorrelation of errors and (ii) the homoskedasticity of errors, i.e., the fact that the variance of the errors is constant. When this second assumption is violated, we speak of heteroskedasticity: the variance of the errors is no longer constant. This chapter concentrates on the problems of autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity of errors. It presents the appropriate estimation methods, as well as the sources, tests, and solutions to autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity. It also provides several empirical applications to illustrate the various theoretical concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is assumed here that there is no autocorrelation of errors.

  2. 2.

    Such a statistic is called a Lagrange multiplier statistic.

  3. 3.

    It is assumed here that the errors are homoskedastic.

  4. 4.

    Let us mention, however, that Farebrother (1980) tabulated the critical values of the statistic DW in the absence of a constant term.

  5. 5.

    It is assumed here that the lagged dependent variable is not among the explanatory variables. We will come back to the Box-Pierce test in Chap. 7.

  6. 6.

    It is unnecessary to introduce a constant term in the regression of \(e_{t}\) on \(e_{t-1}\) since the mean of the residuals is zero.

References

  • Beach, C.M. and J.G. MacKinnon (1978), “A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Autocorrelated Errors”, Econometrica, 46, pp. 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. and D.A. Pierce (1970), “Distribution of Residual Autocorrelation in ARIMA Time Series Models”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, pp. 1509–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S. (1978), “Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models”, Australian Economic Papers, 17, pp. 334–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S. and A.R. Pagan (1979), “A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation”, Econometrica, 47, pp. 1287–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, D. and G.H. Orcutt (1949), “Application of Least Squares Regressions to Relationships Containing Autocorrelated Error Terms”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, pp. 32–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J.G. MacKinnon (1993), Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, P. (1978), Introductory Econometrics, Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. (1970), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression When some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables”, Econometrica, 38, pp. 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. and G.S. Watson (1950), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression I”, Biometrika, 37, pp. 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. and G.S. Watson (1951), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression II”, Biometrika, 38, pp. 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation”, Econometrica, 50(4), pp. 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. (1980), “The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation when There Is No Intercept in the Regression”, Econometrica, 48, pp. 1553–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, R.C. (1970), “Relative Efficiency of Count Sign Changes for Assessing Residual Autoregression in Least Squares Regression”, Biometrika, 57, pp. 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E.A. and M.L. King (1978), “Fourth Order Autocorrelation: Further Significance Points for the Wallis Test”, Journal of Econometrics, 8, pp. 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H. (1969), “A New Test for Heteroscedasticity”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, pp. 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L.G. (1978), “Testing Against Autoregressive and Moving Average Error Models when the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables”, Econometrica, 46, pp. 1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M. and R.E. Quandt (1965), “Some Tests for Homoskedasticity”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, pp. 539–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M. and R.E. Quandt (1972), Nonlinear Econometric Methods, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2020), Econometric Analysis, 8th edition, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N., Porter, D.C. and S. Gunasekar (2017), Basic Econometrics, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C. and G.D.A. Phillips (1973), “A Comparison of the Power of Some Tests for Heteroscedasticity in the General Linear Model”, Journal of Econometrics, 2, pp. 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. (1995), Dynamic Econometrics, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, C. and J. Lu (1960), “Demand Relations with Autocorrelated Disturbances”, Technical Bulletin no. 276, Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. and J. Dinardo (1996), Econometric Methods, 4th edition, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lutkepohl, H. and T.C. Lee (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lutkepohl, H. and T.C. Lee (1988), Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardic, S. and V. Mignon (2002), Économétrie des séries temporelles macroéconomiques et financières, Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, G.M. and G.E.P. Box (1978), “On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Series Models”, Biometrika, 65, pp. 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelhammer, R.C., Judge, G.G. and D.J. Miller (2000), Econometric Foundations, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K. and K.D. West (1987), “A Simple Positive Definite Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix”, Econometrica, 55, pp. 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S.J. and C.B. Winsten (1954), “Trend Estimators and Serial Correlation”, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, no. 383, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, K.F. (1972), “Testing for Fourth-Order Autocorrelation in Quarterly Regression Equations”, Econometrica, 40, pp. 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980), “A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroscedasticity”, Econometrica, 48, pp. 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2012), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th edition, South Western Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mignon, V. (2024). Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation of Errors. In: Principles of Econometrics. Classroom Companion: Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52535-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics