Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia that also carries a high risk of stroke. Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment option for paroxysmal AF, but it results in high recurrence rates in persistent AF cases. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of low voltage- and fibrosis-substrate ablation as effective strategies for reducing AF recurrence. However, there is no mechanistic explanation for the success of substrate-based ablation. We use patient imaging and computational modelling to investigate such mechanisms. Left atrial (LA) models were constructed based on late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging data from a cohort of nine AF patients. Tissue conductivity was inversely proportional to the LGE-CMR image intensity. The impact of low-conductive fibrotic border zone (FBZ) was investigated by comparing conduction velocity (CV) maps and phase singularity (PS) distributions associated with re-entrant drivers for AF with and without its inclusion in each patient LA model. The model simulations revealed that PSs associated with AF drivers were predominantly located within regions of low CV (high LGE-CMR image intensity), either with or without of FBZ. The presence of FBZ facilitated the formation of PSs in regions deeper inside the dense fibrotic tissue, which were characterised by the lowest CV values. This contributed to the stabilisation of AF drivers in the fibrotic areas. Therefore, fibrotic areas characterised by the lowest CV provide the most likely substrate for AF drivers and can be targeted by ablation. Such patient-specific areas can include both the FBZ and deeper-lying regions of dense fibrosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brundel, B.J.J.M., Ai, X., Hills, M.T., Kuipers, M.F., Lip, G.Y.H., de Groot, N.M.S.: Atrial fibrillation. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 8, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00347-9
Wolf, P.A., Abbott, R.D., Kannel, W.B.: Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 22, 983–988 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.22.8.983
Darby, A.E.: Recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: considerations for repeat ablation and strategies to optimize success. J. Atr. Fibrillation 9, 1427 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4022/JAFIB.1427
Sultan, A., et al.: Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: data from the german ablation registry. Sci. Rep. 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-017-16938-6
Lin, W.S., et al.: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non-pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation 107, 3176–3183 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000074206.52056.2D
Junarta, J., Siddiqui, M.U., Riley, J.M., Dikdan, S.J., Patel, A., Frisch, D.R.: Low-voltage area substrate modification for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Europace 24, 1585–1598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUAC089
Marrouche, N.F., Wazni, O., McGann, C., et al.: Effect of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation vs conventional catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DECAAF II randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327, 2296–2305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2022.8831
Roy, A., et al.: Identifying locations of re-entrant drivers from patient-specific distribution of fibrosis in the left atrium. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008086 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008086
Morgan, R., Colman, M.A., Chubb, H., Seemann, G., Aslanidi, O.V.: Slow conduction in the border zones of patchy fibrosis stabilizes the drivers for atrial fibrillation: insights from multi-scale human atrial modeling. Front. Physiol. 7, 474 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00474
Zahid, S., et al.: Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. Cardiovasc. Res. 110, 443–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/CVR/CVW073
Roney, C.H., et al.: Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence by combining population data and virtual cohorts of patient-specific left atrial models. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 15, e010253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010253
Marrouche, N.F., et al.: Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 311, 498–506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2014.3
Benito, E.M., et al.: Left atrial fibrosis quantification by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance: a new method to standardize the thresholds for reproducibility. Europace 19, 1272–1279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUW219
Plank, G., Loewe, A., Neic, A., et al.: The openCARP simulation environment for cardiac electrophysiology. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 208, 106223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMPB.2021.106223
Ohguchi, S., et al.: Regional left atrial conduction velocity in the anterior wall is associated with clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: efficacy in combination with the ipsilateral low voltage area. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 22, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12872-022-02881-6/FIGURES/5
Mendonca Costa, C., Hoetzl, E., Martins Rocha, B., Prassl, A.J., Plank, G.: Automatic parameterization strategy for cardiac electrophysiology simulations. Comput. Cardiol. 40, 373 (2013)
Azzolin, L., et al.: Personalized ablation vs. conventional ablation strategies to terminate atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrence. Europace. euac116–euac116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUAC116
Loewe, A., Wilhelms, M., Dŏssel, O., Seemann, G.: Influence of chronic atrial fibrillation induced remodeling in a computational electrophysiological model. Biomed. Eng./Biomedizinische Technik 59, S929–S932 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2014-5012
Roney, C.H., et al.: Modelling methodology of atrial fibrosis affects rotor dynamics and electrograms. EP Europace 18, iv146–iv155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUW365
Azzolin, L., Schuler, S., Dössel, O., Loewe, A.: A Reproducible protocol to assess arrhythmia vulnerability in silico: pacing at the end of the effective refractory period. Front. Physiol. 12, 420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2021.656411/
Varela, M., Colman, M.A., Hancox, J.C., Aslanidi, O.V.: Atrial heterogeneity generates re-entrant substrate during atrial fibrillation and anti-arrhythmic drug action: mechanistic insights from canine atrial models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1005245
Iyer, A.N., Gray, R.A.: An experimentalist’s approach to accurate localization of phase singularities during reentry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29, 47–59 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1335538
Van Nieuwenhuyse, E., et al.: DG-Mapping: a novel software package for the analysis of any type of reentry and focal activation of simulated, experimental or clinical data of cardiac arrhythmia. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 60, 1929–1945 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11517-022-02550-Y/FIGURES/5
Narayan, S.M., Krummen, D.E., Rappel, W.J.: Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 23, 447–454 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-8167.2012.02332.X
Haissaguerre, M., et al.: Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 130, 530–538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005421
Roberts-Thomson, K.C., et al.: Fractionated atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm: relationship to age, voltage, and conduction velocity. Heart Rhythm 6, 587–591 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HRTHM.2009.02.023
Ogbomo-Harmitt, S., Qureshi, A., King, A., Aslanidi, O.: Impact of fibrosis border zone characterisation on fibrosis-substrate isolation ablation outcome for atrial fibrillation. In: 2022 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), vol. 49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22489/CINC.2022.218
Roy, A., Varela, M., Aslanidi, O.: Image-based computational evaluation of the effects of atrial wall thickness and fibrosis on re-entrant drivers for atrial fibrillation. Front Physiol. 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2018.01352
Roney, C.H., et al.: Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes. Med. Image Anal. 55, 65–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEDIA.2019.04.004
Roney, C.H., et al.: In silico comparison of left atrial ablation techniques that target the anatomical, structural, and electrical substrates of atrial fibrillation. Front. Physiol. 11, 1145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.572874
Aslanidi, O.V., et al.: 3D virtual human atria: a computational platform for studying clinical atrial fibrillation. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 107, 156–168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PBIOMOLBIO.2011.06.011
Clayton, R.H., et al.: Models of cardiac tissue electrophysiology: progress, challenges and open questions. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 104, 22–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PBIOMOLBIO.2010.05.008
Muffoletto, M., et al.: Toward patient-specific prediction of ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation using deep learning. Front. Physiol. 12, 717 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2021.674106
Ogbomo-Harmitt, S., Muffoletto, M., Zeidan, A., Qureshi, A., King, A.P., Aslanidi, O.: Exploring interpretability in deep learning prediction of successful ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. Front. Physiol. 14, 1054401 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2023.1054401
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Medical Research Council [MR/N013700/1], the British Heart Foundation [PG/15/8/31130], and the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT 203148/Z/16/Z].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ogbomo-Harmitt, S., Obada, G., Vandersickel, N., King, A.P., Aslanidi, O. (2024). Effects of Fibrotic Border Zone on Drivers for Atrial Fibrillation: An In-Silico Mechanistic Investigation. In: Camara, O., et al. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Regular and CMRxRecon Challenge Papers. STACOM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14507. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52448-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52448-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52447-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52448-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)