Skip to main content

Critical Culture: The Role of Institutional Norms in Gender Sensitising Parliaments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Suffrage and Its Legacy in the Nordics and Beyond

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

As academics with practical experience of parliamentary service in Australia and Sweden, we take this opportunity to reflect on gender sensitisation drivers in these environments. By revisiting and comparing specific change processes in these two parliaments, we identify a previously missing driver of change, namely critical culture. We define this as an underlying institutional acceptance of the need for—and importance of—gender equality, socially, economically and politically. We suggest that critical culture is the foundation upon which other drivers of gender sensitive change—critical mass, critical acts and critical actors—work. We find that it is the confluence of mass, actors, acts and culture that achieves comprehensive gender sensitive reforms in parliaments. This has interesting implications for scholars and practitioners in the field of gender and parliament, a fairly young discipline that has not yet sufficiently conceptualised and empirically assessed the role of institutional culture despite a longstanding acknowledgement of its importance. We conclude by suggesting measures by which gender equality cultures could be strengthened in parliaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Parliament. (2008). Hansard Debates, 24 June 2008, p. 5783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballington, J. (2005). ‘Introduction’. In J. Ballington and A. Karam (Eds.), Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, 2nd edition. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, K. and Cowell-Meyers, K. (2007). Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3): 553–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, C. et al. (Eds.). (1999). Likestilte demokratier? Kjønn og politikk i Norden [Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2012). Structures and Agency: A Transnational Comparison of the Struggle for Women’s Suffrage in the Nordic Countries During the Long 19th Century. Scandinavian Journal of History, 37(5): 600–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures. Politics and Gender, 1(1): 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2008). Introduction: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3): 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Palmieri, S. (2023). Feminizing Political Institutions. In L. A. Baranak, J. Kantola, M. Sawer and J. True (Eds.), Handbook of Feminist Governance. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2004). New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2013). Negotiating Gendered Institutions: Women’s Parliamentary Friendships. Politics & Gender, 9(2): 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2016). The Good Parliament. Bristol: University of Bristol Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. L. (2006). Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes. Politics & Gender, 2(4): 522–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation. Political Studies, 56: 725–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coote, A. and Patullo, P. (1990). Power and Prejudice: Women and Politics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (1988a). Vi har ventet længe nok. Håndbog i kvinderepræsentation. Köpenhamn: Nordisk Ministerråd. Also published in Icelandic (1988), Norwegian (1989), Swedish (1989) and Finnish (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (1988b). From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4): 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2006). The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4): 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2014). The Critical Mass Theory in Public and Scholarly Debates. In R. Campbell and S. Childs (Eds.), Deeds and Words: Gendering Politics After Joni Lovenduski (pp. 137–163). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, D. and Carroll, S. J. (1991). Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick: Centre for the American Woman and Politics, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. (2017). Riksdagsledamöters erfarenheter och upplevelser av jämställdheten i riksdagen—en intervjustudie. [Members of parliament’s experiences of gender equality in the Riksdag: an interview study.] Report to the Riksdag’s Gender Equality Reference Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. and Freidenvall, L. (2020). A Legislative Gender Equality Norm as a Catalyst for Change? Discursive Convergence in the Case of the Swedish Parliament. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(3). Published on-line. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bup/ejpg/pre-prints/content-ejpgd1900058?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf#Refs

  • Erikson, J. and Freidenvall, L. (2023). Exploring Sustainability in Parliamentary Gender Equality Work. Insights from the Swedish Riksdag. NORANordic Journal of Feminist and Gender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. and Josefsson, C. (2016). Jämställdheten i riksdagen—en enkätstudie [Gender Equality in the Swedish Parliament: A Survey Study]. Report to the Riksdag’s Gender Equality Reference Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. and Josefsson, C. (2019). The Legislature as a Gendered Workplace: Exploring Members of Parliament’s Experiences of Working in the Swedish Parliament. International Political Science Review, 40(2): 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. and Verge, T. (2022). Gender, Power and Privilege in the Parliamentary Workplace. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. (2017). Disentangling Informality and Informal Rules: Explaining Gender Inequality in Chile’s Executive Branch. In G. Waylen (Ed.), Gender and Informal Institutions (pp. 115–135). London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. and Tan, N. (Eds.). (2019). The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L. (2021). Equal Representation Without Legislation: Gender, Power, and Institutions in Sweden. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L. and Erikson, J. (2020). The Speaker’s Gender Equality Group in the Swedish Parliament—A Toothless Tiger? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 8(3): 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S. (2002). Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(1): 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavio-Mannila, E. and Skard, T. (Eds.). (1985). Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Representatives Procedure Committee [HRPC]. (2017). Options for Nursing Mothers. Parliamentary Paper No. 126/2007. Parliament of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977a). Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977b). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook. M. L. and Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, Politics and Institutions. Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. W., Lapinski, M. K., Kerr, J. M., Zhao, J., Bum, T. and Lu, Z. (2022). Culture and Social Norms: Development and Application of a Model for Culturally Contextualized Communication Measurement (MC3M). Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.770513

  • Lovenduski, J. (2001). Women and Politics. In P. Norris (Ed.), Britain Votes 2001 (pp. 179–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, F., Kenny, M. and Chappell, L. (2010). New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5): 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhall, L. (2003). The Militant Suffrage Movement: Citizenship and Resistance in Britain, 18601930. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, K. and Nyberg, A. (Eds.). (2009). Kön och makt i Norden. Del I [Gender and Power in the Nordic Countries: Part I]. Köpenhamn: Nordiska ministerrådet, TemaNord: 569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, K. (Ed.). (2011). Gender and Power in the Nordic Countries. NIKK Publications 2011:1. Oslo: NIKK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Council of Ministers. (2006). Med fokus på køn er målet et ligestillet samfund. Nordisk ligestillingssamarbejde 2006–2010 [With Gender in Focus, the Goal is an Egalitarian Society: Nordic Cooperation for Gender Equality, 2006–2010]. Köpenhamn: Norden ANP: 702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). (2021). Realizing Gender Equality in Parliament: A Guide for Parliaments in the OSCE Region. Warsaw: OSCE ODIHIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, S. and Jabre, K. (2005). Promoting Partnership Between Men and Women in Parliament: The Experience of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. In J. Ballington and A. Karam (Eds.), Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, 2nd edition. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, S. (2023). Can Language Rules Improve Everyday Respect in the Parliamentary Chambers? Australasian Parliamentary Review, 38(1): 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, S. and Baker, K. (2022). Localising Global Norms: The Case of Family-Friendly Parliaments. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(1): 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, J. and Stanley Holton, S. (Eds.). (2000). Votes for Women. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ruiz, B. and Rubio Marín, R. (Eds.). (2012). The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe: Voting to Become Citizens. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, M. and Simms, M. (1993). A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimonović, D. (2009). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Introductory Note. Available at: https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/cedaw/cedaw_e.pdf

  • Sulkunen, I., Nevala-Nurmi, S.-L. and Markkola, P. (Eds.). (2009). Suffrage, Gender and Citizenship: International Perspectives on Parliamentary Reforms. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Parliament. (2004). 15 förslag för en jämställd Riksdag [15 Proposals for a Gender Equal Parliament]. 2004/05:URF1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Parliament. (2005). Jämställt? Röster från Riksdagen 2005 [Gender Equal? Voices from the Swedish Parliament 2005]. 2005/06:URF2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Parliament. (2011). Jämställt? Röster från riksdagen 2010 [Gender Equal? Voices from the Swedish Parliament 2010]. 2011/12:URF1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2009). Equality in Politics: A Survey of Women and Men in Politics. Geneva: IPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2011). Gender-Sensitive Parliaments: A Global Review of Good Practice. Geneva: IPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wängnerud, L. (2015). The Principle of Gender Sensitive Parliaments. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (2014). Informal Institutions, Institutional Change, and Gender Equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1): 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (Ed.). (2017). Gender and Informal Institutions. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Palmieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palmieri, S., Freidenvall, L. (2024). Critical Culture: The Role of Institutional Norms in Gender Sensitising Parliaments. In: Erikson, J., Freidenvall, L. (eds) Suffrage and Its Legacy in the Nordics and Beyond. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52359-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics