Skip to main content

Introduction: A Historical and Institutional Perspective on Women’s Political Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Suffrage and Its Legacy in the Nordics and Beyond

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction positions the book in relation to previous research on women’s suffrage and the continued struggle for women’s political inclusion, primarily with respect to the literature on the Nordic countries but also in a broader perspective. It lays out the main argument of the book: the combination of historical analyses and contemporary political science offers possibilities to gain new insights into the topic of women’s political inclusion. It is argued that research on the conditions for feminist institutional change may be advanced by a specific focus on the gendered institutional constraints and the feminist strategies for institutional change. The introduction also presents the feminist institutionalist approach as well as the historical awareness perspective, which both serve as key starting points for the book. It ends with a presentation of the empirical chapters, which comprise a collection of scholarly pieces by historians and political scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aasen, E. (2013). 1800-tallets kvinner: på vei til stemmerett. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4):441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agerholt, A. C. (1973). Den norske kvinnebevegelses historie. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustín, L. R. (2013). Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe: The Politics of Intersectionality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrling, K. and Holmberg, S. (Eds.). (2018). Demokratins Framtid. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. and Ericsson, M. (Eds.). (2021). Allmän rösträtt? Rösträttens begränsningar i Sverige efter 1921. Stockholm: Makadam förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berling-Åselius, E. (2005). Rösträtt med förhinder: Rösträttsstrecken i svensk politik 1900–1920. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E. (2013). Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E. (2018). Making Gender Visible in Election Violence: Strategies for Data Collection. Politics & Gender, 14(4):690–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E. and Kenny, M. (2016). Comparing Candidate Selection: A Feminist Institutionalist Approach. Government and Opposition, 51(3):370–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E. and Zetterberg, P. (Eds.). (2023). Gender and Violence against Political Actors. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, G. (2017). Kata Dalström: Agitatorn som gick sin egen väg. Lund: Historiska media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkenlid, B. (1982). Kvinnokrav i manssamhälle: rösträttskvinnorna och deras metoder som opinionsbildare och påtryckargrupp i Sverige 1902–21. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkhem, B. and Wängnerud, L. (1994). Rätt att rösta 1919–1994. Så fick kvinnor politiskt inflytande. Stockholm: Riksdagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1980). The Struggle for Women’s Suffrage in Norway, 1885–1913. Scandinavian Journal of History, 5(1–4):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468758008578963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2011). “Women’s Suffrage in the Nordic Countries: A Transnational Perspective”. In L. Freidenvall and J. Rönnbäck (Eds.), Bortom rösträtten: kön, politik och medborgarskap i Norden (pp. 35–61). Huddinge: Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörn högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2012). Structures and Agency: A Transnational Comparison of the Struggle for Women’s Suffrage in the Nordic Countries During the Long 19th Century. Scandinavian Journal of History, 37(5):600–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.729023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, A. (2008). Röstens anatomi: läsningar av politik i Elin Wägners Silverforsen, Selma Lagerlöfs Löwensköldtrilogi och Klara Johansons Tidevarvskåserier. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokholm, S. (2008). I otakt med tiden: om rösträttsmotstånd, antipacifism och nazism bland svenska kvinnor. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchorst, A. and Dahlerup, D. (Eds.). (2015). Før og efter stemmeretten: køn, demokrati og velfærd. Frederiksberg: Frydenlund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, K. A. and Ray, L. (2002). Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Studies, 46(2):428–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brå. (2021). Politikernas trygghetsundersökning 2021. Rapport 2021:13. Stockholm: Brå.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson Wetterberg, C. (1986). Kvinnosyn och kvinnopolitik: en studie av svensk socialdemokrati 1880–1910. Lund: Lunds universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson Wetterberg, C. (2020). Jag saknar fruntimmer här: en biografi över Anna Bugge Wicksell. Stockholm: Natur and Kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2006). Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women’s Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979). Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy, 28(2):85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2008). Studying Women’s Substantive Representation in Legislatures: When Representative Acts, Contexts and Women’s Interests Become Important. Representation, 44(2):111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2014). The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? Political Studies, 60(1):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2020). Feminist Democratic Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K., Childs, S, Kantola, J. and Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation, 44(2):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, L. and Mackay, F. (2017). “What’s in a Name? Mapping the Terrain of Informal Institutions and Gender Politics”. In G. Waylen (Ed.), Gender and Informal Institutions (pp. 23–44). London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Challender, C. (2019). Re-gendering the UK House of Commons: The Academic Critical Actor and Her ‘Feminist in Residence’. Political Studies Review, 17(4):428–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929919866388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. L. (2006). Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes. Politics and Gender, 2(4):203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation. Political Studies, 56(3):725–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actor. Government and Opposition, 44(2):125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Lovenduski, J. (2013). “Political Representation”. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, and S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics (pp. 489–513). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, A. and Zetterberg, P. (2018). Quota Shocks: Electoral Gender Quotas and Government Spending Priorities Worldwide. The Journal of Politics, 80(3):916–932. https://doi.org/10.1086/697251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. and Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics. (2011). Thematic Section. Politics & Gender, 7(3):417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlum, S., Knutsen, C. H. and Mechkova, V. (2022). Women’s Political Empowerment and Economic Growth. World Development, 156(August 2022):105822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105822.

  • Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4):275–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2006). The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4):511–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X0624114X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2015). “Blev valgretten ett gennembrud for kvinder i dansk politik?” In A. Borchorst and D. Dahlerup (Eds.), Før og efter stemmeretten: køn, demokrati og velfærd (pp. 105–126). Frederiksberg: Frydenlund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. and Freidenvall, L. (2005). Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(1):26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674042000324673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, C. and Elgie, R. (2008). The Effect of Increased Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2):237–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diletti, M. (2022). Bringing the History Back into Social and Political Sciences. USAbroad–Journal of American History and Politics, 5(1):43–48. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-2752/14654.

  • Dovi, S. (2007). The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. (2017). Criminalising the Client: Institutional Change, Gendered Ideas and Feminist Strategies. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. (2019). Institutions, Gendered Perceptions, and Frames of Meaning: Explaining Strategic Choices of Women MPs in Swedish Prostitution Policy. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(2):263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. and Josefsson, C. (2019). The legislature as a gendered workplace: Exploring members of parliament’s experiences of working in the Swedish parliament. International Political Science Review, 40(2):197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, C. (2011). “A Powerful Public Sphere? Two Types of Publics During the Struggle for Danish Women’s Enfranchisement”. In L. Freidenvall and J. Rönnbäck (Eds.), Bortom rösträtten: kön, politik och medborgarskap i Norden (pp. 83–96). Huddinge: Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörns högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, C. and Siim, B. (2012). “Democratisation of Denmark: The Inclusion of Women in Political Citizenship”. In B. Rodríguez-Ruiz and R. Rubio-Marín (Eds.), The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe: Voting to Become Citizens (pp. 61–77). Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, C. (2006). Kvinnor får röst. Kön, känslor och politisk kultur i kvinnornas rösträttsrörelse. Stockholm: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, O. and Rickne, J. (2016). The Glass Ceiling in Politics: Formalization and Empirical Tests. Comparative Political Studies, 49(5):567–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015621073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangeur, R. (2013). Kerstin Hesselgren: den gränsöverskridande politikern: en biografi. Stockholm: Carlsson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. (2017). “Disentangling Informality and Informal Rules: Explaining Gender Inequality in Chile’s Executive Branch”. In G. Waylen (Ed.), Gender and Informal Institutions (pp. 115–135). London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. and Piscopo, J. (2008). Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(3):393–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. and Piscopo, J. (2012). The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. and Tan, N. (Eds.). (2019). The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L. (2021). Equal Representation Without Legislation: Gender, Power and Institutions in Sweden. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L. and Rönnbäck, J. (Eds.). (2011). Bortom rösträtten: kön, politik och medborgarskap i Norden. Huddinge: Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörns högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, K. D., Paul, H. D. and Phillips, A. Q. (2023). Point Break: Using Machine Learning to Uncover a Critical Mass in Women’s Representation. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(2):372–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gains, F. and Lowndes, V. (2014). How Is Institutional Formation Gendered, and Does It Make a Difference? A New Conceptual Framework and a Case Study of Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales. Politics & Gender, 10(4):524–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, G. (2009). “To Become a Political Subject: Enfranchisement of Women in Norway”. In I. Sulkunen, S.-L. Nevala-Nurmi, and P. Markkola (Eds.), Suffrage, Gender and Citizenship: International Perspectives on Parliamentary Reforms (pp. 120–144). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakosalo, H. (2011). “A Powerful Precedent: The Recognition of Women’s Academic and Political Rights in Finland”. In L. Freidenvall and J. Rönnbäck (Eds.), Bortom rösträtten: kön, politik och medborgarskap i Norden (pp. 62–82). Huddinge: Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörns högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., Harris, V., Pickover, M., Reid, G., Taylor, J. and Saleh, R. (Eds.). (2002). Refiguring the Archive. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammar, I. (2004). För freden och rösträtten. Kvinnorna och den svensk-norska unionens sista dagar. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrin-Thorell, R., Widemar, I. G., Myrdal, A. and Bergman, M. (1968). Boken om Kerstin Hesselgren: en vänstudie. Stockholm: Norstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrin-Thorell, R., Lindström, U. and Stenberg, G. (Eds.). (1969). Kvinnors röst och rätt. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harjula, M. (2009). “Excluded from Universal Suffrage: Finland After 1906”. In I. Sulkunen, S.-L. Nevala-Nurmi, and P. Markkola (Eds.), Suffrage, Gender and Citizenship: International Perspectives on Parliamentary Reforms (pp. 106–119). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism. Political Studies, 46(5):951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4):725–740. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3688540.

  • Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (Eds.). (2006). Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgersson, U. and Wängnerud, L. (Eds.). (2018). Rösträttens århundrade: Kampen, utvecklingen och framtiden för demokratin i Sverige. Gothenburg and Stockholm: Makadam förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Htun, M. and Piscopo, J. (2014). Women in Politics and Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Working Paper. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalalzai, F. (2016). Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson, C. (2020). Adaptive Resistance: Power Struggles over Gender Quotas in Uruguay. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C. (Ed.). (2001). Rösträtten 80 år: forskarantologi. Stockholm: Justitiedepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and Political Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, G. (2011). “The Making of Political Women. Ulla Lindström and Inga Thorsson in Swedish Politics”. In L. Freidenvall and J. Rönnbäck (Eds.), Bortom rösträtten: kön, politik och medborgarskap i Norden (pp. 97–115). Huddinge: Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörn högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson Sjögren, Å. (2006). Männen, kvinnorna och rösträtten: medborgarskap och representation 1723–1866. Stockholm: Carlsson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2013). Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kittilson, M. C. (2008). Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Politics, 70(2):323–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808033X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, U. (2004). Kvinnor på gränsen till genombrott: grupporträtt av Tidevarvets kvinnor. Stockholm: Bonnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koefoed, N. J. (2015). “Vejen til lige og almindelig valgret”. In A. Borchorst and D. Dahlerup (Eds.), Før og efter stemmeretten: køn, demokrati og velfærd (pp. 61–82). Frederiksberg: Frydenlund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krook. M. L. (2010). Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Political Studies, 58(5):886–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. (2017). Violence Against Women in Politics. Journal of Democracy, 28(1):74–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. and Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. and Zetterberg, P. (Eds.). (2017). Gender Quotas and Women’s Representation: New Directions in Research. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, S., Meier, P. and Sauer, B. (Eds.). (2022). Party Politics and the Implementation on Gender Quotas. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. (2008). “Heltinder og sntihelte. Kvindevalgretskampens historieografi”. In K. Lützen and A. Nielsen (Eds.), På kant med historien. Studier i kön, videneskap og lidenskap tilegnet Bente Rosenbeck på hendes 60-årsdag (pp. 307–327). Copenhagen University: Museum Tuscalanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, E., Manns, U. and Östman, A. -C. (2022). Gender-Equality Pioneering, or How Three Nordic States Celebrated 100 Years of Women’s Suffrage. Scandinavian Journal of History, 47(5):624–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2021.2023035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lépinard, É. and Rubio-Marín, R. (2018). “Introduction: Completing the Unfinished Task? Gender Quotas and the Ongoing Struggle for Women’s Empowerment in Europe”. In É. Lépinard and R. Rubio-Marín (Eds.), Transforming Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636797.001.

  • Liversage, T. (1980). At Erobre Ordet: Kvinderna og arbejder bevaegelsen. Copenhagen: Tiderns Skifter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. and Meier, P. (2014). “The Symbolic Representation of Gender: An Introduction”. In E. Lombardo and P. Meier (Eds.), The Symbolic Representation of Gender: A Discursive Approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. and Meier, P. (2019). The Significance of Symbolic Representation for Gender Issues in Politics. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 27(4):231–244. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2019.1660404.

  • Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V. (2020). How Are Political Institutions Gendered? Political Studies, 68(3):543–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, F. (2014). Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change. Politics & Gender, 10(4):549–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manns, U. (1997). Den sanna frigörelsen: Fredrika-Bremer-förbundet 1884–1921. Eslöv: Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manns, U. (2021). Memory Work, Memory Politics and the Centennial of Women’s Suffrage in Sweden. L’Homme, 32(1):73–87. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A669352734/AONE?u=anon~e7ffb907&sid=googleScholar&xid=136ccc98.

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78(3):734–749. Published online November 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406272563.

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (2008). “Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’”. In S. A. Binder, R. A. W Rhodes, and B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, G. and Verge, T. (2021). Discursive Strategies and Sequenced Institutional Change: The Case of Marriage Equality in the United States. Political Studies, 71(2):463–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211020581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. Journal of Politics, 61(3):628–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moring, A. (Ed.). (2006). Kön och Politik. 100 År av Kvinnlig Rösträtt i Finland. Helsinki: Otava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2010). Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narud, H. M. and Krogstad, A. (2013). “100 år med kvinners stemmerett”. In A. Oltedal and A. Skre (Eds.), Formødrenes stemmer: kvinneliv rundt stemmeretten (pp. 259–294). Oslo: Pax Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklasson, S. (1992). Högerns kvinnor: problem och resurs för Allmänna valmansförbundet perioden 1900–1936/37. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, T. (2001). “Högern 1900–1940. En historisk vandring mot demokrati”. In C. Jönsson (Ed.), Rösträtten 80 år: Forskarantologi. Stockholm: Justitiedepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, K. (2007). Karriär i männens värld. Nationalekonomen och feministen Karin Kock. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrbin, C. (2004). Från isolering till integrering. En kollektivbiografisk studie över de kvinnliga riksdagsledamöterna under tvåkammarriksdagens tid 1922–1970. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political Recruitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørregaard Hansen, H. (1992). De danske valgretskvinder og suffragetterne: Landsforbundet for Kvinders valgret (1907–15) og den internationale kvindevalgretsbevægelse. Kvinder, køn og forskning, 1(2):62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltedal, A. and Skre, A. (Eds.). (2013). Formødrenes stemmer: kvinneliv rundt stemmeretten. Oslo: Pax Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Östberg, K. (1997). Efter rösträtten: kvinnors utrymme efter det demokratiska genombrottet. Eslöv: Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, S. (2018). “Gender-Sensitive Parliaments”. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P., Hughes, M. and Barnes, M. (2020). Women, Politics, and Power. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1995). The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity and Race. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. and Skocpol, T. (2002). “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science”. In I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline (pp. 693–721). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation (Vol. 75). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rincker, M. E. (2009). Masculinized or Marginalized: Decentralization and Women’s Status in Regional Polish Institutions. Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy, 30(1):46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770802367796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ruiz, B. and Rubio-Marín, R. (Eds.). (2012). The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe: Voting to Become Citizens (pp. 61–77). Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnbäck, J. (2004). Politikens genusgränser. Den kvinnliga rösträttsrörelsen och kampen för politiskt medborgarskap 1902–1921. Stockholm: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5):1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1999). Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2006). Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3):570–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2010). Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. and Mischler, W. (2005). An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2):407–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00323.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siim, B. (2001). “Kön i den danske utopi”. In A. D. Christensen and B. Siim (Eds.), Kön, Demokrati og Modernite. Mod nye politiske identiteter. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smrek, M. (2022). When Is Access to Political Capital Gendered? Lessons from the Czech Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(1):76–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S. (2008). “Historical Institutionalism”. In D. della Porta and M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, I. (1987). Kvinnans rösträtt och medborgarorganiseringen. Historisk tidskrift för Finland, 72(3):505–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, I. (2008). “Finland - ett föregångsland inom kvinnlig rösträtt”. In I. Sulkunen (Ed.), Kvinnorna i riksdagen. Finlands riksdag 100 år (pp. 10–81). Helsingfors: Edita.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, I. (2009). “Suffrage, Nation and Political Mobilisation: The Finnish Case in an International Context”. In I. Sulkunen, S.-L. Nevala-Nurmi, and P. Markkola (Eds.), Suffrage, Gender and Citizenship: International Perspectives on Parliamentary Reforms (pp. 83–105). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, I., Nevala-Nurmi, S.-L. and Markkola, P. (Eds.). (2009). Suffrage, Gender and Citizenship: International Perspectives on Parliamentary Reforms. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styrkársdóttir, A. (1998). From Feminism to Class Politics. The Rise and Decline of Women’s Politics in Reykjavik, 1908–1922. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swers, M. (2002). The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1):369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2006). “Why and How History Matters”. In R. E. Goodin and C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 417–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3):167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, J. (2015). The Pursuit of History. Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of History. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wängnerud, L. (2000). Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1):67–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallinder, T. (1962). I kamp för demokratin: Rösträttsrörelsen i Sverige 1886–1900. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verge, T., Wiesehomeier, N. and Espirito-Santo, A. (2020). Framing Symbolic Representation: Exploring How Women’s Political Presence Shapes Citizens’ Political Attitudes. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(2):257–276. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510819X15698538164156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (2014). Informal Institutions, Institutional Change, and Gender Equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1):212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (2009). What can Historical Institutionalism Offer Feminist Institutionalists? Politics & Gender, 5(2):245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (Ed.). (2017). Gender and Informal Institutions. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, S. L. (2011). When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmer, D. and Bouché, V. (2013). The Limits of Gendered Leadership. Policy Implications of Female Leadership on ‘Women’s Issues’. Politics & Gender, 9(3):245–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1300024X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, M. Y. (2011). More Women in the Tanzanian Legislature: Do Numbers Matter? Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 29(1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2011.539011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenita Freidenvall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erikson, J., Freidenvall, L. (2024). Introduction: A Historical and Institutional Perspective on Women’s Political Inclusion. In: Erikson, J., Freidenvall, L. (eds) Suffrage and Its Legacy in the Nordics and Beyond. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52359-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics